Saccadic anomalies: Vergence induces large departures from ball-and-socket behavior

The configuration of muscular forces, which maintains a given orientation of the eye, varies with vergence state. As a consequence, changes in vergence produce both static and dynamic violations of simple ball-and-socket behavior: during strong convergence, the entire eye is displaced temporally within its orbit at steady state by as much as 200 microns; and the axis of ocular rotation for small horizontal saccades is consistently displaced forward within the globe by an average of about 1 mm. These phenomena occur regardless of whether vergence is maintained by accommodation or by binocular disparity. Hence, systematic errors of as much as a full degree can arise in measurement of vergence movement, unless monitoring methods are used which are insensitive to translational motion. The observed displacement on the axis of rotation for saccades may be involved in subjective shrinkage of visual targets during convergence ("experimental micropsia ").

[1]  Martin J. Steinbach,et al.  Nonadditivity of vergence and saccadic eye movement , 1978, Vision Research.

[2]  L. Stark,et al.  Unequal saccades during vergence. , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[3]  Charles Wheatstone,et al.  I. The Bakerian Lecture.— Contributions to the physiology of vision.— Part the second. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision (continued) , 1852, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[4]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  Changing fixation in the transverse plane at eye level and Hering's law of equal innervation , 1978, Vision Research.

[5]  G. Breinin,et al.  The nature of vergence revealed by electromyography. II. Accommodative and fusional vergence. , 1957, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[6]  C. Wheatstone XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[7]  G WESTHEIMER,et al.  Eye movement responses to convergence stimuli. , 1956, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  L. Stark,et al.  Binocular eye movements during accommodative vergence , 1978, Vision Research.

[9]  M. V. Van Allen,et al.  Electromyography of Extraocular Muscles in Fusional Movements*: I. Electric Phenomena at the Breakpoint of Fusion , 1957 .

[10]  L. Young,et al.  Survey of eye movement recording methods , 1975 .

[11]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  A Heuristic Model for the Human Vergence Eye Movement System , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  D. Robinson,et al.  Abducens unit behavior in the monkey during vergence movements. , 1972, Vision research.

[13]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Disjunctive eye movements , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  K N OGLE,et al.  On the precise objective determination of eye movements. , 1956, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  A JAMPOLSKY,et al.  An electromyographic study of asymmetric convergence. , 1958, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  E. Keller Accommodative vergence in the alert monkey. Motor unit analysis. , 1973, Vision research.

[17]  J. T. Enright Ocular translation and cyclotorsion due to changes in fixation distance , 1980, Vision Research.

[18]  G. Breinin,et al.  The nature of vergence revealed by electromyography. , 1955, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.