Reliable Collection of Real-Time Patient Physiologic Data from less Reliable Networks: a “Monitor of Monitors” System (MoMs)

Research and practice based on automated electronic patient monitoring and data collection systems is significantly limited by system down time. We asked whether a triple-redundant Monitor of Monitors System (MoMs) to collect and summarize key information from system-wide data sources could achieve high fault tolerance, early diagnosis of system failure, and improve data collection rates. In our Level I trauma center, patient vital signs(VS) monitors were networked to collect real time patient physiologic data streams from 94 bed units in our various resuscitation, operating, and critical care units. To minimize the impact of server collection failure, three BedMaster® VS servers were used in parallel to collect data from all bed units. To locate and diagnose system failures, we summarized critical information from high throughput datastreams in real-time in a dashboard viewer and compared the before and post MoMs phases to evaluate data collection performance as availability time, active collection rates, and gap duration, occurrence, and categories. Single-server collection rates in the 3-month period before MoMs deployment ranged from 27.8 % to 40.5 % with combined 79.1 % collection rate. Reasons for gaps included collection server failure, software instability, individual bed setting inconsistency, and monitor servicing. In the 6-month post MoMs deployment period, average collection rates were 99.9 %. A triple redundant patient data collection system with real-time diagnostic information summarization and representation improved the reliability of massive clinical data collection to nearly 100 % in a Level I trauma center. Such data collection framework may also increase the automation level of hospital-wise information aggregation for optimal allocation of health care resources.

[1]  T. Scalea,et al.  Dynamic three-dimensional scoring of cerebral perfusion pressure and intracranial pressure provides a brain trauma index that predicts outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. , 2011, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[3]  Maxime Cannesson,et al.  Monitoring in the Intensive Care , 2012, Critical care research and practice.

[4]  Bizhan Aarabi,et al.  Automated measurement of "pressure times time dose" of intracranial hypertension best predicts outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[5]  J. Ledikwe,et al.  Improving the quality of health information: a qualitative assessment of data management and reporting systems in Botswana , 2014, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[6]  T. Scalea,et al.  Heart Rate and Pulse Pressure Variability are Associated With Intractable Intracranial Hypertension After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury , 2010, Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology.

[7]  Keng-Hao Liu,et al.  Brief episodes of intracranial hypertension and cerebral hypoperfusion are associated with poor functional outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. , 2011, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  M. Brandon Westover,et al.  Safety evaluation of a Medical Device Data System , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  Jose Salinas,et al.  Physiological and medical monitoring for en route care of combat casualties. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  Shamim Nemati,et al.  A Physiological Time Series Dynamics-Based Approach to Patient Monitoring and Outcome Prediction , 2014, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[11]  Martin L. Shooman,et al.  Reliability of Computer Systems and Networks: Fault Tolerance,Analysis,and Design , 2002 .

[12]  T. H. Kyaw,et al.  Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care II: A public-access intensive care unit database* , 2011, Critical care medicine.

[13]  T. Scalea,et al.  Timing of Intracranial Hypertension Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury , 2013, Neurocritical Care.

[14]  Mohammed A Mohammed,et al.  Impact of introducing an electronic physiological surveillance system on hospital mortality , 2014, BMJ quality & safety.

[15]  Shiming Yang,et al.  'Big data' approaches to trauma outcome prediction and autonomous resuscitation. , 2014, British journal of hospital medicine.

[16]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[17]  Konstantinos Kalpakis,et al.  Online Recovery of Missing Values in Vital Signs Data Streams Using Low-Rank Matrix Completion , 2012, 2012 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications.

[18]  Shiming Yang,et al.  Computational gene mapping to analyze continuous automated physiologic monitoring data in neuro-trauma intensive care , 2012, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[19]  G. Verghese,et al.  Model-Based Noninvasive Estimation of Intracranial Pressure from Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity and Arterial Pressure , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.