The Power of Alumni Networks - Success of Startup Companies Correlates with Online Social Network Structure of its Founders

In this paper we analyze the success of startups in Germany by looking at the social network structure of their founders on the German-language business-networking site XING. We address two related research questions. First we examine university-wide networks, constructing alumni networks of 12 German universities, with the goal of identifying the most successful founder networks among the 12 universities. Second, we also look at individual actor network structure, to find the social network attributes of the most successful founders. We automatically collected the publicly accessible portion of XING, filtering people by attributes indicative of their university, and roles as founders, entrepreneurs, and CEOs. We identified 51,976 alumni, out of which 14,854 have entrepreneurship attributes. We also manually evaluated the financial success of a subsample of 80 entrepreneurs for each university. We found that universities, which are more central in the German university network, provide a better environment for students to found more and more successful startups. University networks whose alumni have a stronger “old-boys-network”, i.e. a larger share of their links with other alumni of their alma mater, are more successful as founders of startups. On the individual level the same holds true: the more links founders have with alumni of their university, the more successful their startup is. Finally, the absolute amount of networking matters, i.e. the more links entrepreneurs have, and the higher their betweenness in the online network of university alumni, the more successful they are.

[1]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[3]  N. Luhmann Trust and Power , 1979 .

[4]  Daniel J. Brass Men's and Women's Networks: A Study of Interaction Patterns and Influence In an Organization , 1985 .

[5]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[6]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Environments and Strategies of Organization Start-Up: Effects on Early Survival , 1989 .

[7]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[8]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics , 1992 .

[9]  Curtis J. Simon,et al.  Matchmaker, Matchmaker: The Effect of Old Boy Networks on Job Match Quality, Earnings, and Tenure , 1992, Journal of Labor Economics.

[10]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[11]  R. Gulati Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[12]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[13]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[14]  Joseph Cothrel,et al.  On-line communities: helping them form and grow , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[15]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The centrality of groups and classes , 1999 .

[16]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[17]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[18]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[19]  Douglas R. White,et al.  The Navigability of strong ties: small worlds, tie strength, and network topology , 2002 .

[20]  Yan Zhao,et al.  Visualization of Communication Patterns in Collaborative Innovation Networks - Analysis of Some W3C Working Groups , 2003, CIKM '03.

[21]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[22]  John G. Breslin,et al.  Online Social and Business Networking Communities , 2004, ECAI Workshop on Application of Semantic Web Technologies to Web Communities.

[23]  Fiona E. Murray The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life , 2004 .

[24]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis: Extending Centrality , 2005 .

[25]  Corey Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Small World Connectivity on Firm Innovation , 2005 .

[26]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Small World Connectivity on Firm Innovation , 2005 .

[27]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  José Luis Ortega,et al.  Scientific research activity and communication measured with cybermetrics indicators , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Yan Zhao,et al.  Analyzing Actors and Their Discussion Topics by Semantic Social Network Analysis , 2006, Tenth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'06).

[30]  D. Harrison,et al.  TIES, LEADERS, AND TIME IN TEAMS: STRONG INFERENCE ABOUT NETWORK STRUCTURE'S EFFECTS ON TEAM VIABILITY AND PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[31]  Peter A. Gloor,et al.  Size Really Matters - New Insights for Start-ups' Survival , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[32]  Sinan Aral Network Structure & Information Advantage , 2007 .

[33]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  D. Boyd Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life , 2007 .

[35]  Christopher J. Malloy,et al.  The Small World of Investing: Board Connections and Mutual Fund Returns , 2007, Journal of Political Economy.

[36]  Steven L. Puller,et al.  The Old Boy (and Girl) Network: Social Network Formation on University Campuses , 2008 .

[37]  A. Vespignani,et al.  Economic Networks: The New Challenges , 2009, Science.

[38]  Marco De Maggio,et al.  Collaborative innovation networks, virtual communities and geographical clustering , 2009 .

[39]  Peter A. Gloor,et al.  Does Geographic Clustering Still Benefit High Tech New Ventures? The Case of the Cambridge/Boston Biotech Cluster , 2009 .

[40]  D. Romer,et al.  Realizing the Social Internet? Online Social Networking Meets Offline Civic Engagement , 2009 .

[41]  Detlef Schoder,et al.  Web Science 2.0: Identifying Trends through Semantic Social Network Analysis , 2008, 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering.

[42]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[43]  A. Pentland,et al.  The Virtual Mirror - Reflecting on Social and Psychological Self to Increase Organizational Creativity , 2010 .

[44]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[45]  Thijs Broekhuizen,et al.  Proceedings of the Academy of Management Conference, 12-16 , 2011 .