A trait-based approach for modelling microbial litter decomposition.

Trait-based models are an emerging tool in ecology with the potential to link community dynamics, environmental responses and ecosystem processes. These models represent complex communities by defining taxa with trait combinations derived from prior distributions that may be constrained by trade-offs. Herein I develop a model that links microbial community composition with physiological and enzymatic traits to predict litter decomposition rates. This approach allows for trade-offs among traits that represent alternative microbial strategies for resource acquisition. The model predicts that optimal strategies depend on the level of enzyme production in the whole community, which determines resource availability and decomposition rates. There is also evidence for facilitation and competition among microbial taxa that co-occur on decomposing litter. These interactions vary with community investment in extracellular enzyme production and the magnitude of trade-offs affecting enzyme biochemical traits. The model accounted for 69% of the variation in decomposition rates of 15 Hawaiian litter types and up to 26% of the variation in enzyme activities. By explicitly representing diversity, trait-based models can predict ecosystem processes based on functional trait distributions in a community. The model developed herein illustrates that traits influencing microbial enzyme production are some of the key controls on litter decomposition rates.

[1]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges , 2001, Science.

[2]  N. Ostle,et al.  Microbial contributions to climate change through carbon cycle feedbacks , 2008, The ISME Journal.

[3]  C. Trasar-Cepeda,et al.  Thermodynamic parameters of enzymes in grassland soils from Galicia, NW Spain [2008 Jan., v. 40, issue 1, p. 269.] , 2007 .

[4]  S. Copley,et al.  A compromise required by gene sharing enables survival: Implications for evolution of new enzyme activities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  J. Olson,et al.  Energy Storage and the Balance of Producers and Decomposers in Ecological Systems , 1963 .

[6]  C. Cleveland,et al.  C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? , 2007 .

[7]  M. Gessner,et al.  CONTRIBUTION OF STREAM DETRIVORES, FUNGI, AND BACTERIA TO LEAF BREAKDOWN BASED ON BIOMASS ESTIMATES , 2002 .

[8]  D. M. Nelson,et al.  The southern ocean at the Last Glacial Maximum: A strong sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide , 2000 .

[9]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  MICROBIAL ENZYME SHIFTS EXPLAIN LITTER DECAY RESPONSES TO SIMULATED NITROGEN DEPOSITION , 2000 .

[10]  C. Arnosti Speed bumps and barricades in the carbon cycle: Substrate structural effects on carbon cycling , 2004 .

[11]  P. Reich,et al.  Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high‐ and low‐rainfall and high‐ and low‐nutrient habitats , 2001 .

[12]  Elena Litchman,et al.  Trait-Based Community Ecology of Phytoplankton , 2008 .

[13]  The Bacteria , 1881, Nature.

[14]  T. Fukami,et al.  Assembly history dictates ecosystem functioning: evidence from wood decomposer communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[15]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Production of extracellular protease and glucose uptake in Bacillus clausii in steady-state and transient continuous cultures. , 2002, Journal of biotechnology.

[16]  S. Tringe,et al.  Comparative Metagenomics of Microbial Communities , 2004, Science.

[17]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology , 2010 .

[18]  A. Konopka,et al.  Physiological and Ecological Adaptations of Slow-Growing, Heterotrophic Microbes and Consequences for Cultivation , 2009 .

[19]  O. Nybroe,et al.  Interactions between proteolytic and non-proteolytic Pseudomonas fluorescens affect protein degradation in a model community. , 2000, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[20]  Jos M. Raaijmakers,et al.  Antibiotic production by bacterial biocontrol agents , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[21]  Andrew J. Watson,et al.  Ecosystem dynamics based on plankton functional types for global ocean biogeochemistry models , 2005 .

[22]  W. McGill,et al.  Comparative aspects of cycling of organic C, N, S and P through soil organic matter , 1981 .

[23]  Antje Chang,et al.  BRENDA, the enzyme information system in 2011 , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  M. Strickland,et al.  Considering fungal:bacterial dominance in soils – Methods, controls, and ecosystem implications , 2010 .

[25]  Robert W. Sterner,et al.  Are bacteria more like plants or animals? Growth rate and resource dependence of bacterial C : N : P stoichiometry , 2003 .

[26]  S. Pacala,et al.  A METHOD FOR SCALING VEGETATION DYNAMICS: THE ECOSYSTEM DEMOGRAPHY MODEL (ED) , 2001 .

[27]  M. Weiss,et al.  Temperature sensitivity of soil enzyme kinetics under N‐fertilization in two temperate forests , 2012 .

[28]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[29]  M. P.R.,et al.  A METHOD FOR SCALING VEGETATION DYNAMICS: THE ECOSYSTEM DEMOGRAPHY MODEL (ED) , 2022 .

[30]  S. Waksman,et al.  COMPOSITION OF NATURAL ORGANIC MATERIALS AND THEIR DECOMPOSITION IN THE SOIL: IV. THE NATURE AND RAPIDITY OF DECOMPOSITION OF THE VARIOUS ORGANIC COMPLEXES IN DIFFERENT PLANT MATERIALS, UNDER AEROBIC CONDITIONS , 1929 .

[31]  B. Enquist,et al.  Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[33]  Rick L. Stevens,et al.  Functional metagenomic profiling of nine biomes , 2008, Nature.

[34]  C. Liao,et al.  Biochemical and Genetic Characterization of an Extracellular Protease from Pseudomonas fluorescensCY091 , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[35]  Andreas Richter,et al.  Proteome analysis of fungal and bacterial involvement in leaf litter decomposition , 2010, Proteomics.

[36]  S. Hobbie Contrasting Effects of Substrate and Fertilizer Nitrogen on the Early Stages of Litter Decomposition , 2005, Ecosystems.

[37]  Francesca M. Hopkins,et al.  A framework for representing microbial decomposition in coupled climate models , 2012, Biogeochemistry.

[38]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Extracellular Enzyme Activities and Carbon Chemistry as Drivers of Tropical Plant Litter Decomposition , 2004 .

[39]  D. Moorhead,et al.  A THEORETICAL MODEL OF LITTER DECAY AND MICROBIAL INTERACTION , 2006 .

[40]  S. Tringe,et al.  Metagenomic Discovery of Biomass-Degrading Genes and Genomes from Cow Rumen , 2011, Science.

[41]  J. Vickers,et al.  The ecology of antibiotic production , 1986, Microbial Ecology.

[42]  M. Weintraub,et al.  Emerging tools for measuring and modeling the in situ activity of soil extracellular enzymes , 2008 .

[43]  J. Cole,et al.  BACTERIAL GROWTH EFFICIENCY IN NATURAL AQUATIC SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[44]  P. Reich,et al.  [Letters to nature] , 1975, Nature.

[45]  K. Fog,et al.  THE EFFECT OF ADDED NITROGEN ON THE RATE OF DECOMPOSITION OF ORGANIC MATTER , 1988 .

[46]  Sébastien Barot,et al.  Size and functional diversity of microbe populations control plant persistence and long‐term soil carbon accumulation , 2005 .

[47]  S. Allison Soil minerals and humic acids alter enzyme stability: implications for ecosystem processes , 2006 .

[48]  B. Bohannan,et al.  Microbial Biogeography: From Taxonomy to Traits , 2008, Science.

[49]  M. Gessner,et al.  Diversity meets decomposition. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[50]  Joshua P. Schimel,et al.  The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model , 2003 .

[51]  S. Salzberg,et al.  Complete Genome Sequence of a Virulent Isolate of Streptococcus pneumoniae , 2001, Science.

[52]  C. Liao,et al.  Biochemical and Genetic Characterization of an Extracellular Protease from Pseudomonas fluorescensCY091 , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[53]  S. Waksman,et al.  COMPOSITION OF NATURAL ORGANIC MATERIALS AND THEIR DECOMPOSITION IN THE SOIL: III. THE INFLUENCE OF NATURE OF PLANT UPON THE RAPIDITY OF ITS DECOMPOSITION , 1928 .

[54]  Peter S. Curtis,et al.  NITROGEN ADDITIONS AND LITTER DECOMPOSITION: A META-ANALYSIS , 2005 .

[55]  G. Somero,et al.  Temperature Adaptation of Enzymes: Biological Optimization Through Structure-Function Compromises , 1978 .

[56]  John C. Avise,et al.  Resistance, Resilience, and Redundancy in Microbial Communities , 2008 .

[57]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances , 2000 .

[58]  P. Marlière,et al.  Molecular Evolution of Protein Atomic Composition , 2001, Science.

[59]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes , 1996 .

[60]  Andreas Richter,et al.  Optimization of Biomass Composition Explains Microbial Growth-Stoichiometry Relationships , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[61]  C. Mcclaugherty,et al.  Temperature responses of enzymes in two forest soils , 1990 .

[62]  Aaron D. Peacock,et al.  PLANT DIVERSITY, SOIL MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, AND ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION: ARE THERE ANY LINKS? , 2003 .

[63]  J. Deming,et al.  A Predictive Model of Bacterial Foraging by Means of Freely Released Extracellular Enzymes , 1998, Microbial Ecology.

[64]  Sallie W. Chisholm,et al.  Emergent Biogeography of Microbial Communities in a Model Ocean , 2007, Science.

[65]  Jennifer A Hoeting,et al.  A structured and dynamic framework to advance traits-based theory and prediction in ecology. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[66]  B. Berg Nutrient release from litter and humus in coniferous forest soils—a mini review , 1986 .

[67]  R. Peralta,et al.  Production of extracellular protease by Aspergillus tamarii , 2000 .

[68]  Jason G. Bragg,et al.  Protein carbon content evolves in response to carbon availability and may influence the fate of duplicated genes , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[69]  S. Allison Cheaters, diffusion and nutrients constrain decomposition by microbial enzymes in spatially structured environments , 2005 .

[70]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Influence of carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability , 2007 .