Fire risk assessment of airborne lithium battery based on entropy weight improved cloud model

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to combine the entropy weight method with the cloud model and establish a fire risk assessment method for airborne lithium battery. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, the fire risk assessment index system is established by fully considering the influence of the operation process of airborne lithium battery. Then, the cloud model based on entropy weight improvement is used to analyze the indexes in the system, and the cloud image is output to discuss the risk status of airborne lithium batteries. Finally, the weight, expectation, entropy and hyperentropy are analyzed to provide risk prevention measures. Findings In the risk system, bad contact of charging port, mechanical extrusion and mechanical shock have the greatest impact on the fire risk of airborne lithium battery. The fire risk of natural factors is at a low level, but its instability is 25% higher than that of human risk cases and 150% higher than that of battery risk cases. Practical implications The method of this paper can evaluate any type of airborne lithium battery and provide theoretical support for airborne lithium battery safety management. Originality/value After the fire risk assessment is completed, the risk cases are ranked by entropy weight. By summarizing the rule, the proposed measures for each prevention level are given.

[1]  Kang-Wei Wang,et al.  Design and Optimization for a New Locomotive Power Battery Box , 2022, Sustainability.

[2]  Qingsong Wang,et al.  A LiFePO4 Based Semi-solid Lithium Slurry Battery for Energy Storage and a Preliminary Assessment of Its Fire Safety , 2022, Fire Technology.

[3]  Junxian He,et al.  The influence of overcharge and discharge rate on the thermal safety performance of lithium-ion battery under low air pressure , 2022, Ionics.

[4]  Byung-Ki Kim,et al.  Safety Assessment for External Short Circuit of Li-Ion Battery in ESS Application Based on Operation and Environment Factors , 2022, Energies.

[5]  Q. Guo,et al.  Rockfall hazard assessment of the slope of Mogao Grottoes, China based on AHP, F-AHP and AHP-TOPSIS , 2022, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[6]  A. Dorsz,et al.  Analysis of Fire Hazards Associated with the Operation of Electric Vehicles in Enclosed Structures , 2021, Energies.

[7]  Yue Zhang,et al.  Investigation on effect of phase change material on the thermal runaway of lithium-ion battery and exploration of flame retardancy improvement , 2021, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[8]  Junru Zhao,et al.  Safety assessment method for storage tank farm based on the combination of structure entropy weight method and cloud model , 2021, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[9]  V. Viswanathan,et al.  A review of safety considerations for batteries in aircraft with electric propulsion , 2021, MRS Bulletin.

[10]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Influence of Aging on the Failing Behavior of Automotive Lithium-Ion Batteries , 2021, Batteries.

[11]  Quanle Zou,et al.  A fire risk assessment method based on the combination of quantified safety checklist and structure entropy weight for shopping malls , 2021 .

[12]  Jiahai Yuan,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of national electric power development based on cloud model and entropy method and TOPSIS: A case study in 11 countries , 2020 .

[13]  Min Zhang,et al.  Application of SMES-FCL in Electric Aircraft for Stability Improvement , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[14]  Wei Li,et al.  Weight analysis of influencing factors of dam break risk consequences , 2018, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences.

[15]  Domenica Mirauda,et al.  Statistical characterization of flow field structure in evolving braided gravel beds , 2017 .

[16]  Xinping Yan,et al.  Fire risk assessment of battery powered ship using entropy cloud method , 2017, 2017 4th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS).

[17]  Ajay Kapoor,et al.  Review of mechanical design and strategic placement technique of a robust battery pack for electric vehicles , 2016 .

[18]  Per Blomqvist,et al.  Characteristics of lithium-ion batteries during fire tests , 2014 .

[19]  Yannick Le Nir,et al.  A dynamic and generic cloud computing model for glaciological image processing , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[20]  Dirk Uwe Sauer,et al.  Design of a Safe and Reliable Li-ion Battery System for Applications in Airborne System , 2014 .

[21]  Michael Pecht,et al.  Lessons Learned from the 787 Dreamliner Issue on Lithium-Ion Battery Reliability , 2013 .

[22]  Robert Howe,et al.  Lithium battery fires: implications for air medical transport. , 2012, Air medical journal.

[23]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Hydrologic Synthesis Using Entropy Theory: Review , 2011 .

[24]  Joon-Shik Moon,et al.  Effect of Excavation-Induced Groundwater Level Drawdown on Tunnel Inflow in a Jointed Rock Mass , 2010 .

[25]  Michael D. Farrington,et al.  Safety of lithium batteries in transportation , 2001 .

[26]  M. Ye,et al.  Optimization of the Heat Dissipation Structure for Lithium-ion Battery Packs Based on Thermodynamic Analyses , 2022, IEEE Access.

[27]  Nischal Thapa,et al.  All electric aircraft: A reality on its way , 2021 .

[28]  Mona Ghassemi,et al.  Electric Power Systems in More and All Electric Aircraft: A Review , 2020, IEEE Access.

[29]  F. Larsson,et al.  Abuse by External Heating, Overcharge and Short Circuiting of Commercial Lithium-Ion Battery Cells , 2014 .

[30]  Jürgen Klüver,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication: Meaning, information, and topology , 2011, Complex..