The nature and development of preservice science teachers' conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy

The purpose of this study was to assess the development and changes in preservice science teachers' subject matter and pedagogy knowledge structures as they proceeded through a professional teacher education program. Twelve secondary preservice science teachers were asked to create representations of their subject matter and pedagogy knowledge structures periodically (four times spanning the entirety of their subject-specific teacher education program) and participate in a videotaped interview concerning the eight knowledge structure representations immediately following student teaching. Qualitative analyses of knowledge structure representations and transcribed interviews within and between subjects were performed by one of the researchers and “blindly” corroborated by the other two researchers. Initial knowledge structure representations were typically linear and lacked coherence. Both types of knowledge structure representations were highly susceptible to change as a consequence of the act of teaching. Although there was some overlap between subject matter and pedagogy knowledge structures, they were reported to exert separate influences on classroom practice, with the pedagogy knowledge structure having primary influence on instructional decisions. Furthermore, the complexity of one's subject matter structure appeared to be a critical factor in determining whether the structure directly influences classroom practice.

[1]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Preservice biology teachers' knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A year‐long assessment , 1993 .

[2]  Pinchas Tamir,et al.  The relations between disciplinary and pedagogical knowledge and the length of teaching experience of biology and geography teachers , 1990 .

[3]  Thomas L. Good,et al.  Looking in Classrooms , 1973 .

[4]  Tyrannical Machines. A Report on Educational Practices Gone Wrong and Our Best Hopes for Setting Them Right. , 1990 .

[5]  Linda S. Lotto Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[6]  Greta Morine-Dershimer Preservice Teachers' Conceptions of Content and Pedagogy: Measuring Growth in Reflective, Pedagogical Decision-Making , 1989 .

[7]  R. Good,et al.  Biology content cognitive structure: From science student to science teacher , 1992 .

[8]  L. Shulman Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[9]  L. West,et al.  Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change , 1985 .

[10]  Norman G. Lederman Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[11]  L. Shulman,et al.  Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Social Studies , 1987 .

[12]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[13]  J. Brophy Teacher behavior and student achievement , 1984 .

[14]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Metamorphosis, Adaptation, or Evolution?: Preservice Science Teachers' Concerns and Perceptions of Teaching and Planning. , 1991 .

[15]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..