A Study of the New Zealand Mathematics Curriculum

Given the profound and uncritiqued changes that have been implemented in Aotearoa New Zealand education since the 1990s, this paper provides a critical commentary on the characterising features of the New Zealand mathematics’ curriculum in the context of the first stage of a study. The emphasis is on the importance of research design that begins with an explicit, evidence-based hypothesis. To that end, we describe evidence that informs and identifies the study’s hypothesised problem and causes. The study itself will show whether or not the hypothesis is justified; that is, is the absence of standardised prescribed content in New Zealand mathematics’ curriculum the reason for the country’s declining mathematics rankings? The study aims to increase understanding in the field of mathematics education by exploring the effects on New Zealand year 7 public school teachers’ mathematics curriculum selection and design practices, teaching practices, and subsequently student achievement.

[1]  Daniel Couch.  From Progressivism to Instrumentalism: Innovative Learning Environments According to New Zealand’s Ministry of Education , 2018 .

[2]  Michael Young,et al.  Knowledge, Curriculum and Qualifications for South African Further Education , 2006 .

[3]  Alan Richardson.  FREEDOM IN A SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY: READING THE CONTEXT OF REICHENBACH’S CONTEXTS , 2006 .

[4]  Susan A. Peters,et al.  Asset-Based Approaches to Equitable Mathematics Education Research and Practice , 2018, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

[5]  R. Olsen.  TIMSS VERSUS PISA: THE CASE OF PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS , 2006 .

[6]  Elizabeth Rata,et al.  A Pedagogy of Conceptual Progression and the Case for Academic Knowledge. , 2016 .

[7]  Claire Sinnema,et al.  Downgraded curriculum? An analysis of knowledge in new curricula in Scotland and New Zealand , 2014 .

[8]  Christopher Winch,et al.  Curriculum Design and Epistemic Ascent. , 2013 .

[9]  Roger Openshaw,et al.  Catching the Knowledge Wave? the Knowledge Society and the Future of Education , 2007 .

[10]  F. Korthagen,et al.  Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: towards professional development 3.0 , 2016 .

[11]  Peter Mortimore,et al.  Learning: The Treasure Within , 1999 .

[12]  David W. Carraher,et al.  Arithmetic and Algebra in Early Mathematics Education , 2006 .

[13]  M. Lourie.  Recontextualising Twenty-first Century Learning in New Zealand Education Policy: The Reframing of Knowledge, Skills and Competencies , 2020 .

[14]  Ted Glynn,et al.  Culture Counts: Changing Power Relations in Education , 1999 .

[15]  R. Nola.  Saving Kuhn from the Sociologists of Science , 2000 .

[16]  Anthony D. Smith,et al.  The Ethnic Revival , 1981 .

[17]  G. Biesta.  Giving Teaching Back to Education: Responding to the Disappearance of the Teacher , 2013 .

[18]  Jaguthsing Dindyal,et al.  The Singaporean mathematics curriculum: Connections to TIMSS , 2006 .

[19]  G. Aitken,et al.  The New Zealand curriculum: for English-medium teaching and learning in years 1-13 , 2007 .

[20]  Rosemary Hipkins,et al.  Supporting Future-oriented Learning and Teaching: A New Zealand Perspective , 2012 .

[21]  G. Verleden,et al.  Foreword , 1992, Steroids.

[22]  Elizabeth Rata.  The Curriculum Design Coherence Model in the Knowledge‐Rich School Project , 2021 .