MRI Induced Torque and Demagnetization in Retention Magnets for a Bone Conduction Implant

Performing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations in patients who use implantable medical devices involve safety risks both for the patient and the implant. Hearing implants often use two permanent magnets, one implanted and one external, for the retention of the external transmitter coil to the implanted receiver coil to achieve an optimal signal transmission. The implanted magnet is subjected to both demagnetization and torque, magnetically induced by the MRI scanner. In this paper, demagnetization and a comparison between measured and simulated induced torque is studied for the retention magnet used in a bone conduction implant (BCI) system. The torque was measured and simulated in a uniform static magnetic field of 1.5 T. The magnetic field was generated by a dipole electromagnet and permanent magnets with two different types of coercive fields were tested. Demagnetization and maximum torque for the high coercive field magnets was 7.7% ± 2.5% and 0.20 ± 0.01 Nm, respectively and 71.4% ± 19.1% and 0.18 ± 0.01 Nm for the low coercive field magnets, respectively. The simulated maximum torque was 0.34 Nm, deviating from the measured torque in terms of amplitude, mainly related to an insufficient magnet model. The BCI implant with high coercive field magnets is believed to be magnetic resonance (MR) conditional up to 1.5 T if a compression band is used around the skull to fix the implant. This is not approved and requires further investigations, and if removal of the implant is needed, the surgical operation is expected to be simple.

[1]  Sabine Reinfeldt,et al.  The Bone Conduction Implant—First Implantation, Surgical and Audiologic Aspects , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[2]  Christie McComb,et al.  Evaluation of the translational and rotational forces acting on a highly ferromagnetic orthopedic spinal implant in magnetic resonance imaging , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  Fritz Schick,et al.  Eddy‐current induction in extended metallic parts as a source of considerable torsional moment , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Sabine Reinfeldt,et al.  Analysis and Design of RF Power and Data Link Using Amplitude Modulation of Class-E for a Novel Bone Conduction Implant , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Frank G Shellock,et al.  Regarding the value reported for the term "spatial gradient magnetic field" and how this information is applied to labeling of medical implants and devices. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  B. Håkansson,et al.  The balanced electromagnetic separation transducer a new bone conduction transducer. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Frank G. Shellock,et al.  Reference Manual for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Implants, and Devices , 2009 .

[8]  G. Schaefers,et al.  Testing MR Safety and Compatibility , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[9]  Stefan Stenfelt,et al.  A novel bone conduction implant (BCI): Engineering aspects and pre-clinical studies , 2010, International Journal of Audiology.

[10]  Arne Ernst,et al.  MRI scanning in patients implanted with a vibrant soundbridge , 2011, The Laryngoscope.

[11]  Stefan Stenfelt,et al.  Percutaneous Versus Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant System: A Feasibility Study on a Cadaver Head , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[12]  Dominique Givord,et al.  Coercivity mechanisms in ferrites and rare earth transition metal sintered magnets (SmCo/sub 5/, Nd-Fe-B) , 1988 .

[13]  E S Hochmair,et al.  Cochlear implants: in vitro investigation of electromagnetic interference at MR imaging--compatibility and safety aspects. , 1998, Radiology.

[14]  D. I. Paul,et al.  Ferromagnetic coercivity and applied field orientation , 1995 .

[15]  F. Shellock,et al.  MRI and implanted medical devices: basic interactions with an emphasis on heating , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability.

[16]  C. Rudowicz,et al.  A closer look at the hysteresis loop for ferromagnets - A survey of misconceptions and misinterpreta , 2002 .

[17]  M. Levitt Spin Dynamics: Basics of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance , 2001 .