Designing for family phatic communication: a design critique approach

Changing patterns of domestic life mean that it is increasingly common for people to work away from home for extended periods. Communications technologies are arguably positioned to help repair ensuing emotional disconnects. We are exploring the use of technology to support re-engagement in the quotidian rituals of family life to foster emotional connectedness whilst away from home. Adopting a design research approach, we develop five sensibilities for productively critiquing and developing design proposals for such domestic technologies. These sensibilities, Temporality, Expression, Connectivity, Reciprocality and Perceivable Volume, are derived from a critical analysis of 68 extant designs, which we illustrate with six exemplars supporting differing levels of ritualistic behaviour. To demonstrate the critical utility of these sensibilities for design processes, we interrogate two early design sketches. We contribute further critical reflections on design research methods and the role of 'design critique' in technology development.

[1]  Martin R. Gibbs,et al.  SynchroMate: a phatic technology for mediating intimacy , 2005, DUX '05.

[2]  D. Cheal,et al.  Sociology of Family Life , 2002 .

[3]  C. Bell.  Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions , 1997 .

[4]  Sean Rintel,et al.  Video-Mediated Communication , 2017 .

[5]  Richard Harper,et al.  Glancephone: an exploration of human expression , 2009, Mobile HCI.

[6]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Tangible interfaces for remote collaboration and communication , 1998, CSCW '98.

[7]  William W. Gaver.  Making spaces: how design workbooks work , 2011, CHI.

[8]  Joseph Kaye,et al.  Communicating intimacy one bit at a time , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[9]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  Sabbath day home automation: "it's like mixing technology and religion" , 2007, CHI.

[10]  M. Castells.  The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1999 .

[11]  Robert J. Anderson,et al.  Representations and Requirements: The Value of Ethnography in System Design , 1994, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Danny Miller,et al.  A Theory of Shopping , 1999 .

[13]  Scott Brave,et al.  inTouch: a medium for haptic interpersonal communication , 1997, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  What is "critical" about critical design? , 2013, CHI.

[15]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[16]  Rebecca E. Grinter,et al.  Extraordinary computing: religion as a lens for reconsidering the home , 2009, CHI.

[17]  Joyce Yee,et al.  Design Transitions: Inspiring Stories. Global Viewpoints. How Design is Changing. , 2013 .

[18]  Christena Nippert-Eng.  Home and Work: Negotiating Boundaries through Everyday Life , 1996 .

[19]  E. Lambourn.  A history of the world in 100 objects , 2011 .

[20]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Digital Christmas: an exploration of festive technology , 2012, DIS '12.

[21]  Tracey Potts,et al.  Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life , 2015 .

[22]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects , 2001 .

[23]  John Bowers,et al.  The logic of annotated portfolios: communicating the value of 'research through design' , 2012, DIS '12.

[24]  L. Bennett,et al.  Family rituals. , 1984, Family process.

[25]  Konstantinos Kazakos.  Understanding the role of technology in parent-child reunion , 2013, CSCW '13.

[26]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group , 1992, CHI.

[27]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Reading critical designs: supporting reasoned interpretations of critical design , 2014, CHI.

[28]  Richard Harper,et al.  The Connected Home: The Future of Domestic Life , 2012 .

[29]  Stefan Agamanolis,et al.  Habitat: Awareness of Life Rhythms over a Distance Using Networked Furniture , 2003 .

[30]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Making Multiple Uses of the Obscura 1C Digital Camera: Reflecting on the Design, Production, Packaging and Distribution of a Counterfunctional Device , 2015, CHI.

[31]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Feather, Scent, and Shaker: Supporting Simple Intimacy , 1996 .

[32]  L. Winner.  DO ARTIFACTS HAVE (cid:1) POLITICS? , 2022 .

[33]  Muriel Zimmerman,et al.  Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[34]  John Zimmerman,et al.  6 – Showroom: Research Meets Design and Art , 2012 .

[35]  Stefan Agamanolis,et al.  Iso-phone: a total submersion telephonic experience , 2003, ISICT.

[36]  Richard Harper,et al.  Inside the Smart Home , 2003, Springer London.