Tailoring the visual communication of climate projections for local adaptation practitioners in Germany and the UK

Visualizations are widely used in the communication of climate projections. However, their effectiveness has rarely been assessed among their target audience. Given recent calls to increase the usability of climate information through the tailoring of climate projections, it is imperative to assess the effectiveness of different visualizations. This paper explores the complexities of tailoring through an online survey conducted with 162 local adaptation practitioners in Germany and the UK. The survey examined respondents’ assessed and perceived comprehension (PC) of visual representations of climate projections as well as preferences for using different visualizations in communicating and planning for a changing climate. Comprehension and use are tested using four different graph formats, which are split into two pairs. Within each pair the information content is the same but is visualized differently. We show that even within a fairly homogeneous user group, such as local adaptation practitioners, there are clear differences in respondents’ comprehension of and preference for visualizations. We do not find a consistent association between assessed comprehension and PC or use within the two pairs of visualizations that we analysed. There is, however, a clear link between PC and use of graph format. This suggests that respondents use what they think they understand the best, rather than what they actually understand the best. These findings highlight that audience-specific targeted communication may be more complex and challenging than previously recognized.

[1]  S. Linden.  The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model , 2015 .

[2]  Taciano L Milfont,et al.  The Interplay Between Knowledge, Perceived Efficacy, and Concern About Global Warming and Climate Change: A One‐Year Longitudinal Study , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  Anthony Leiserowitz,et al.  Misinterpretations of the “Cone of Uncertainty” in Florida during the 2004 Hurricane Season , 2007 .

[4]  L. Dilling,et al.  Creating usable science: Opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy , 2011 .

[5]  Jessica S. Ancker,et al.  The Practice of Informatics: Design Features of Graphs in Health Risk Communication: A Systematic Review , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Applying the science of communication to the communication of science , 2011 .

[7]  Stewart J. Cohen,et al.  Future visioning of local climate change: A framework for community engagement and planning with scenarios and visualisation , 2011 .

[8]  Sirkku Juhola,et al.  Challenges of adaptation to climate change across multiple scales: A case study of network governance in two European countries , 2011 .

[9]  A. Leiserowitz,et al.  How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: plain facts, pie charts or metaphors? , 2014, Climatic Change.

[10]  Neville Nicholls,et al.  Cognitive Illusions, Heuristics, and Climate Prediction , 1999 .

[11]  J. Pallant.  SPSS survival manual : a step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS version 15 , 2007 .

[12]  Elisabeth Stephens,et al.  Communicating probabilistic information from climate model ensembles—lessons from numerical weather prediction , 2012 .

[13]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment , 2010, Nature.

[14]  J. A. P. Oliveira.  The implementation of climate change related policies at the subnational level: An analysis of three countries , 2009 .

[15]  A. Vedlitz,et al.  The effect of perceived and assessed knowledge of climate change on public policy concerns: An empirical comparison , 2014 .

[16]  Susanne C. Moser,et al.  Communicating adaptation to climate change: the art and science of public engagement when climate change comes home , 2014 .

[17]  Alfons Maes,et al.  Would you prefer pie or cupcakes? Preferences for data visualization designs of professionals and laypeople in graphic design , 2014, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[18]  S. Lorenz,et al.  The communication of physical science uncertainty in European National Adaptation Strategies , 2013, Climatic Change.

[19]  F. G. Martínez,et al.  Interpretations of the Flood , 1998 .

[20]  S. Cooper,et al.  Sub-national Responses to Climate Change in England: Evidence from Local Area Agreements , 2011 .

[21]  Deborah Hemming,et al.  Mapping the climate: guidance on appropriate techniques to map climate variables and their uncertainty , 2011 .

[22]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Visualizing Seismic Risk and Uncertainty , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Debra Knopman,et al.  Success matters: Recasting the relationship among geophysical, biological, and behavioral scientists to support decision making on major environmental challenges , 2006 .

[24]  Robert J. Moorhead,et al.  A User Study to Compare Four Uncertainty Visualization Methods for 1D and 2D Datasets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[25]  P. Wolski,et al.  Interpreting climate data visualisations to inform adaptation decisions , 2015 .

[26]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  A method to evaluate the usability of interactive climate change impact decision aids , 2014, Climatic Change.

[27]  Serge Planton,et al.  Annex III: glossary , 2013 .

[28]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  Ten guidelines for effective data visualization in scientific publications , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[29]  James J. Porter,et al.  The Right Stuff? Informing Adaptation to Climate Change in British Local Government , 2015 .

[30]  Richard B. Rood,et al.  Climate projections and their impact on policy and practice , 2010 .

[31]  P. Ubel,et al.  Measuring Numeracy without a Math Test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[32]  W. T. Tucker,et al.  Strategies for Risk Communication , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[33]  D. Demeritt,et al.  The UK Climate Change Programme and communication with local authorities , 2004 .

[34]  Christine J. Kirchhoff,et al.  Narrowing the climate information usability gap , 2012 .

[35]  Ariel Malka,et al.  The Association of Knowledge with Concern About Global Warming: Trusted Information Sources Shape Public Thinking , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[36]  Oliver Gebhardt,et al.  Barriers and opportunities for urban adaptation planning: analytical framework and evidence from cities in Latin America and Germany , 2013, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[37]  D. Huitema,et al.  Climate policy innovation:The adoption and diffusion of adaptation policies across Europe , 2014 .

[38]  Fabiola Cristina Rodríguez Estrada,et al.  Improving Visual Communication of Science Through the Incorporation of Graphic Design Theories and Practices Into Science Communication , 2015 .

[39]  J Pallant,et al.  A step by step to guide to data analysis using SPSS: SPSS survival Manual. , 2007 .

[40]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  Four barriers to the development of effective exploratory visualisation tools for the geosciences , 1999, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[41]  H. Füssel.  Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons , 2007 .

[42]  Sophie A. Nicholson-Cole.  Representing climate change futures: a critique on the use of images for visual communication , 2005, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[43]  Kelly A. Dorgan,et al.  Risk Comprehension and Judgments of Statistical Evidentiary Appeals: When a Picture Is Not Worth a Thousand Words. , 2005 .

[44]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[45]  Kelly A. Dorgan,et al.  Risk Comprehension and Judgments of Statistical Evidentiary Appeals , 2005 .

[46]  Miriah D. Meyer,et al.  Information visualisation for science and policy: engaging users and avoiding bias. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[47]  Dawei Han,et al.  Automated Thiessen polygon generation , 2006 .

[48]  D. Lüthi,et al.  The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves , 2004, Nature.

[49]  M. Pelling,et al.  Shadow Spaces for Social Learning: A Relational Understanding of Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change within Organisations , 2008 .

[50]  Mike Pearson,et al.  Visualizing Uncertainty About the Future , 2022 .

[51]  Reinhard Steurer,et al.  The Governance of Climate Change Adaptation in 10 OECD Countries: Challenges and Approaches , 2012 .

[52]  G. Gigerenzer.  Ecological intelligence: An adaptation for frequencies , 1997 .

[53]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Visualizing probabilistic flood forecast information: expert preferences and perceptions of best practice in uncertainty communication , 2011 .

[54]  Andrew P. Morse,et al.  Visualizing the uncertainty in the relationship between seasonal average climate and malaria risk , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[55]  M. Simpson.  Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States , 2011 .

[56]  L. Gimesi.  Development of a visualization method suitable to present tendencies of changes in precipitation , 2009 .

[57]  Charles G. Martin,et al.  Influence of data display formats on physician investigators' decisions to stop clinical trials: prospective trial with repeated measures , 1999, BMJ.

[58]  G. Vulturius,et al.  Overcoming social barriers to learning and engagement with climate change adaptation: experiences with Swedish forestry stakeholders , 2015 .

[59]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Risk communication with pictographs: The role of numeracy and graph processing , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[60]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks , 2011 .

[61]  A. Kumar,et al.  Hell and High Water: Practice-Relevant Adaptation Science , 2013, Science.

[62]  M. Granger Morgan,et al.  Graphical Communication of Uncertain Quantities to Nontechnical People , 1987 .

[63]  Miroslav Sirota,et al.  Ecological rationality or nested sets? Individual differences in cognitive processing predict Bayesian reasoning , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[64]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. , 2008, Health education research.

[65]  Henry Rothstein,et al.  Risk and the limits of governance: Exploring varied patterns of risk‐based governance across Europe , 2013 .

[66]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Cognitive and affective risk judgements related to climate change , 2007 .