Nonspecific binding to microsomes: impact on scale-up of in vitro intrinsic clearance to hepatic clearance as assessed through examination of warfarin, imipramine, and propranolol.

The nonspecific, noncovalent binding of three drugs, imipramine, warfarin, and propranolol, to pooled human and animal liver microsomes has been determined using equilibrium dialysis in conditions where no cofactor (NADPH) was included in the incubation. The binding of warfarin was dependent upon both protein and drug concentration, whereas the binding of propranolol and imipramine was also dependent upon protein concentration but generally independent of drug concentration. At a microsomal protein concentration of 1.0 mg/ml and a warfarin concentration of 10 microM, the free fraction (fu(mic)) was 0.85. The corresponding values for propranolol and imipramine were 0.41 and 0.16, respectively. Thus, although all three drugs exhibit high binding in plasma (fu<0.1) the acidic drug warfarin differs from the basic drugs propranolol and imipramine in the extent to which each binds to microsomal protein. The binding of all three drugs to liver microsomes obtained from commonly studied animal species (rat, dog, and monkey) was almost identical to that observed in human. Additionally, the binding of warfarin and propranolol to microsomes obtained from insect cells used in baculovirus cytochrome P450 expression systems was similar to that exhibited in liver microsomes, when equal protein concentrations were compared. The enzyme kinetics of propranolol, imipramine, and warfarin oxidative metabolism were determined in pooled human liver microsomes, and the intrinsic clearance values obtained were used in scaling up to project human in vivo clearance. The values obtained by incorporating microsomal binding were compared with those in which this factor is ignored. The findings suggest that the parameter fu(mic) is important to obtain when attempting to relate in vitro intrinsic clearance to in vivo clearance. Also, this value is important to consider when comparing substrates with respect to enzyme specificity, since measured apparent KM values should be converted to true "free KM" values by correcting for the free fraction in the in vitro incubation. Furthermore, the extent of nonspecific binding to microsomes is likely an important parameter to consider when attempting to relate Ki values measured in vitro to observations of drug-drug interactions (or the lack thereof) in vivo.

[1]  W. L. Nelson,et al.  Metabolic kinetics of pseudoracemic propranolol in human liver microsomes. Enantioselectivity and quinidine inhibition. , 1994, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[2]  E. Skjelbo,et al.  Inhibitors of imipramine metabolism by human liver microsomes. , 1992, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[3]  K. Chiba,et al.  The role of S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase in imipramine metabolism by human liver microsomes: a two-enzyme kinetic analysis of N-demethylation and 2-hydroxylation. , 1994, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[4]  R. Obach The importance of nonspecific binding in in vitro matrices, its impact on enzyme kinetic studies of drug metabolism reactions, and implications for in vitro-in vivo correlations. , 1996, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[5]  J. Strong,et al.  Effect of albumin on the estimation, in vitro, of phenytoin Vmax and Km values: implications for clinical correlation. , 1997, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[6]  C. D. Francesco,et al.  Membrane lipids as intracellular binders of chlorpromazine and related drugs. , 1977, Chemico-biological interactions.

[7]  A. Guillouzo,et al.  Report on the international workshop on the use of human in vitro liver preparations to study drug metabolism in drug development. Held at Utrecht, The Netherlands, 6-8 September 1994. , 1995 .

[8]  Grant R. Wilkinson,et al.  A physiological approach to hepatic drug clearance , 1975 .

[9]  C. B. Kristensen Imipramine serum protein binding in healthy subjects , 1983, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[10]  P. McNamara,et al.  Age and propranolol stereoselective disposition in humans , 1992, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[11]  T Ishizaki,et al.  Prediction of in vivo drug metabolism in the human liver from in vitro metabolism data. , 1997, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[12]  G R Wilkinson,et al.  Prediction of hepatic extraction ratio from in vitro measurement of intrinsic clearance. , 1977, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[13]  J. Lin,et al.  Kinetic studies on the deethylation of ethoxybenzamide. A comparative study with isolated hepatocytes and liver microsomes of rat. , 1980, Biochemical pharmacology.

[14]  J. Houston,et al.  Prediction of in vivo disposition from in vitro systems: clearance of phenytoin and tolbutamide using rat hepatic microsomal and hepatocyte data. , 1995, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[15]  A. Breckenridge,et al.  Warfarin. Stereochemical aspects of its metabolism and the interaction with phenylbutazone. , 1974, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[16]  F. Sallee,et al.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Imipramine and Desipramine , 1990, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[17]  A. Glassman,et al.  Plasma binding of imipramine and clinical outcome. , 1973, The American journal of psychiatry.

[18]  M. Chiba,et al.  Pharmacokinetic correlation between in vitro hepatic microsomal enzyme kinetics and in vivo metabolism of imipramine and desipramine in rats. , 1990, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[19]  A. Breckenridge,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the enantiomers of warfarin in man , 1974, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[20]  M. Bickel,et al.  Binding of basic and acidic drugs to rat tissue subcellular fractions. , 1974, Chemico-biological interactions.

[21]  M. Gibaldi,et al.  Metabolic enantiomeric interactions: the inhibition of human (S)-warfarin-7-hydroxylase by (R)-warfarin. , 1991, Chirality.

[22]  M. Gibaldi,et al.  Characteristics of warfarin hydroxylation catalyzed by human liver microsomes. , 1989, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[23]  G. Tucker,et al.  Propranolol oxidation by human liver microsomes--the use of cumene hydroperoxide to probe isoenzyme specificity and regio- and stereoselectivity. , 1990, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[24]  R. Branch,et al.  Biological determinants of propranolol disposition in man , 1978, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[25]  E. Chan,et al.  Disposition of warfarin enantiomers and metabolites in patients during multiple dosing with rac-warfarin. , 1994, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[26]  T. Walle,et al.  Quantitative account of propranolol metabolism in urine of normal man. , 1985, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[27]  T. Walle,et al.  Partial metabolic clearances as determinants of the oral bioavailability of propranolol. , 1986, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[28]  T. Moreland,et al.  Studies on a ketone reductase in human and rat liver and kidney soluble fraction using warfarin as a substrate. , 1975, Biochemical pharmacology.

[29]  J B Houston,et al.  Utility of in vitro drug metabolism data in predicting in vivo metabolic clearance. , 1994, Biochemical pharmacology.

[30]  D. Morgan,et al.  (S)-4'-hydroxypropranolol causes product inhibition and dose-dependent bioavailability of propranolol enantiomers in the isolated perfused rat liver and in rat liver microsomes. , 1996, Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems.

[31]  P. Beaune,et al.  Major pathway of imipramine metabolism is catalyzed by cytochromes P-450 1A2 and P-450 3A4 in human liver. , 1993, Molecular pharmacology.

[32]  I Skånberg,et al.  In vivo pharmacokinetics of felodipine predicted from in vitro studies in rat, dog and man. , 2009, Acta pharmacologica et toxicologica.