Critical frequency of photic driving in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. A comparison to pattern evoked responses.

Patients with known or suspected multiple sclerosis (MS) were tested for abnormalities in visual evoked potentials. We compared the critical frequency of photic driving (CFPD) with pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (PVER). We found the CFPD to be somewhat more sensitive than PVER for detecting abnormalities in the visual pathways of patients with MS. When used together, the two were complementary, each fining abnormalities that the other missed. When evaluating patients with MS with evoked potentials, both PVER and CFPD should be tested.

[1]  U. Kuhnt,et al.  Visual pattern evoked responses and blink reflexes in assessment of MS diagnosis , 1976, Journal of Neurology.

[2]  D. Regan,et al.  Subclinical optic neuropathy in multiple sclerosis. , 1977, Archives of neurology.

[3]  I. Rosén,et al.  DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF VISUAL EVOKED RESPONSE, CLINICAL EYE EXAMINATION AND CSF ANALYSIS IN CHRONIC MYELOPATHY , 1977, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[4]  G. Celesia,et al.  Visual electroencephalographic computer analysis (VECA) , 1977, Neurology.

[5]  C. Ellenberger,et al.  Visual evoked potentials and quantitative perimetry in multiple sclerosis , 1977, Annals of neurology.

[6]  H. Freund,et al.  The comparison of small-size rectangle and checkerboard stimulation for the evaluation of delayed visual evoked responses in patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. , 1977, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  G. Ellison,et al.  Criteria for the clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis , 1976, Neurology.

[8]  W. Hoyt,et al.  Subclinical optic neuropathy in multiple sclerosis. How early VER components reflect axon loss and conduction defects in optic pathways. , 1975, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[9]  C. Marsden,et al.  Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. , 1975, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  D. Regan,et al.  Differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis by visual evoked potential recording. , 1974, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  W. Mcdonald,et al.  Visual Evoked Response in Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis , 1973, British medical journal.

[12]  N. Namerow,et al.  Visual evoked responses in patients with multiple sclerosis 1 , 1972, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  K. A. Kooi,et al.  Visually evoked responses in multiple sclerosis1 , 1971, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.