Readability analysis of patient information on the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery website

Objective: To evaluate the readability of patient-oriented online health information (OHI) presented on the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (AAO–HNS) website. Study Design: Review of the Flesch-Kincaid (FK) grade level for 104 articles on the AAO–HNS website. Methods: The FK grade level for 104 articles was determined using the readability calculator available within Microsoft Office Word 2003. The interobserver reliability for the FK grade level was determined by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for 52 entries. Results: The average FK grade reading level of the articles was 10.8 (range 6.3-16.7; 95% CI, 10.4-11.2). Eighty-one percent of the articles were written at a ninth grade level or higher. The intraclass correlation was good (r = 0.83) for the 52 articles that were independently reviewed. Conclusions: This analysis has shown that the average reading level for each article on the AAO–HNS site was higher than the recommended sixth grade reading level. Although the AAO–HNS site is written at a higher level than that suggested for the general public, it is important to realize that readability is just one consideration in the evaluation of OHI comprehension. Physicians need to be cognizant of their patients' ability to read and comprehend written information and tailor their educational material appropriately.

[1]  B. Coyle,et al.  Patient literacy and the readability of written cancer educational materials. , 1995, Oncology nursing forum.

[2]  Meg Wilson,et al.  Readability and Patient Education Materials Used for Low-Income Populations , 2009, Clinical nurse specialist CNS.

[3]  B. Morrey.  Readability of Patient Education Materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Web Sites , 2009 .

[4]  D B Friedman,et al.  Health literacy and the World Wide Web: Comparing the readability of leading incident cancers on the Internet , 2006, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[5]  Kimberly M. Kelly,et al.  Tools for Assessing Readability and Quality of Health-Related Web Sites , 2009, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[6]  T. Volsko,et al.  Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information. , 2008, Respiratory care.

[7]  S. Sabharwal,et al.  Readability of Online Patient Education Materials From the AAOS Web Site , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  D Burling,et al.  Radiology and the internet: a systematic review of patient information resources. , 2001, Clinical radiology.

[9]  Daniela B Friedman,et al.  Readability of cancer information on the internet. , 2004, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[10]  J. Albright,et al.  Readability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practice. , 1996, Applied nursing research : ANR.

[11]  Marsha P. Johnson.  Statistical Methods for Health Care Research , 1996 .

[12]  L. G. Doak,et al.  Teaching Patients With Low Literacy Skills , 1985 .

[13]  R. P. Fishburne,et al.  Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel , 1975 .

[14]  T. Davis,et al.  Patient Reading Ability: An Overlooked Problem in Health Care , 1991, Southern medical journal.

[15]  B. Munro.  Statistical methods for health care research , 1986 .

[16]  Daniela B. Friedman,et al.  A Systematic Review of Readability and Comprehension Instruments Used for Print and Web-Based Cancer Information , 2006, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[17]  Mark A. Kutner,et al.  The Health Literacy of America's Adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. NCES 2006-483. , 2006 .