Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs "Sticky"?

A fundamental assumption in cost accounting is that the relation between costs and volume is symmetric for volume increases and decreases. In this study, we investigate whether costs are “sticky”—that is, whether costs increase more when activity rises than they decrease when activity falls by an equivalent amount. We find, for 7,629 firms over 20 years, that selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) costs increase on average 0.55% per 1% increase in sales but decrease only 0.35% per 1% decrease in sales. Our analysis compares the traditional model of cost behavior in which costs move proportionately with changes in activity with an alternative model in which sticky costs occur because managers deliberately adjust the resources committed to activities. We test hypotheses about the properties of sticky costs and how the degree of stickiness of SG&A costs varies with firm circumstances.

[1]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[2]  George Foster,et al.  Financial Statement Analysis. , 1980 .

[3]  W. Dixon,et al.  Estimates of Parameters of a Censored Regression Sample , 1972 .

[4]  William F. Messier,et al.  Auditing and Assurance Services: A Systematic Approach , 2002 .

[5]  Madhav V. Rajan,et al.  Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis , 1972 .

[6]  R. Banker,et al.  An empirical study of cost drivers in the U.S. Airline Industry , 1993 .

[7]  J. MacKinnon,et al.  Several Tests for Model Specication in the Pres-ence of Alternative Hypotheses , 1981 .

[8]  Patricia M. Dechow,et al.  The effect of restructuring charges on executives' cash compensation , 1993 .

[9]  Dov,et al.  The analysis and use of financial statements , 1993 .

[10]  J. Durbin,et al.  Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. II. , 1950, Biometrika.

[11]  David F. Larcker,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF ACCOUNTING AND MARKET MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE IN EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION CONTRACTS , 1987 .

[12]  Robert S. Kaplan,et al.  The design of cost management systems : text, cases, and readings , 1991 .

[13]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[14]  Naomi S. Soderstrom,et al.  Are overhead costs strictly proportional to activity? : Evidence from hospital departments , 1994 .

[15]  B. Lev,et al.  Fundamental Information Analysis , 1993 .

[16]  Eric W. Noreen,et al.  The Accuracy of Proportional Cost Models: Evidence from Hospital Service Departments , 1997 .