Effects of low frequency continuous muscle vibration on learning and transfer of a knee joint positioning task

The use of continuous low frequency vibration has been shown to improve perception of limb motion under certain conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine whether practice combined with continuous low frequency vibration could be used to enhance learning and subsequent transfer of a knee joint positioning task. Absolute and constant error were compared between a Control group, that did not receive vibration during practice and an Experimental group, that received 15Hz vibration on the quadriceps tendon during each practice trial. Both groups were able to reduce absolute and constant error with practice but vibration had no impact on learning or transfer. These findings indicate that subjects effectively ignore the vibration induced input instead of using it in a beneficial way to augment the sensory input associated with limb motion. This suggests that the vibration induced haptic input may be down weighted by the sensory motor system such that ongoing movement was not disrupted. It is possible that vibration may only be useful when the haptic input generated by vibration is meaningfully related to the task.

[1]  Wiebren Zijlstra,et al.  Effects of vibrating insoles on standing balance in diabetic neuropathy. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  R Johansson,et al.  Adaptation to vibratory perturbations in postural control. , 2003, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[3]  J. Roll,et al.  Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  D. McCloskey,et al.  Proprioceptive Illusions Induced by Muscle Vibration: Contribution by Muscle Spindles to Perception? , 1972, Science.

[5]  V. Gurfinkel,et al.  Effect of slow, small movement on the vibration-evoked kinesthetic illusion , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Sang-I Lin,et al.  Effects of ankle proprioceptive interference on locomotion after stroke. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  D. G. Buma,et al.  Intermittent Stimulation Delays Adaptation to Electrocutaneous Sensory Feedback , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. , 1990 .

[9]  D. Reisman,et al.  Split-Belt Treadmill Adaptation Transfers to Overground Walking in Persons Poststroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[10]  Rolf Johansson,et al.  Analysis of short- and long-term effects of adaptation in human postural control , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  R. Malenka,et al.  Velocity-dependent suppression of cutaneous sensitivity during movement , 1982, Experimental Neurology.

[12]  Brady L. Tripp,et al.  Elbow joint position sense after neuromuscular training with handheld vibration. , 2009, Journal of athletic training.

[13]  Carmelo Bosco,et al.  The Use of Vibration as an Exercise Intervention , 2003, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[14]  Cara E. Stepp,et al.  Vibrotactile feedback aids EMG control of object manipulation , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  Y. Matsuoka,et al.  Repeated Training with Augmentative Vibrotactile Feedback Increases Object Manipulation Performance , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  Kelvin S. Oie,et al.  Multisensory fusion: simultaneous re-weighting of vision and touch for the control of human posture. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  Peter H. Veltink,et al.  Vibrotactile stimulation of the upper leg: Effects of location, stimulation method and habituation , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.