ZNF281 contributes to the DNA damage response by controlling the expression of XRCC2 and XRCC4
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Sáez-Vásquez,et al. Nucleolin: dual roles in rDNA chromatin transcription. , 2015, Gene.
[2] R A Knight,et al. PPISURV: a novel bioinformatics tool for uncovering the hidden role of specific genes in cancer survival outcome , 2014, Oncogene.
[3] R. Sears,et al. Endogenous c-Myc is essential for p53-induced apoptosis in response to DNA damage in vivo , 2014, Cell Death and Differentiation.
[4] Bruno Amati,et al. Genome recognition by MYC. , 2014, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine.
[5] R A Knight,et al. DRUGSURV: a resource for repositioning of approved and experimental drugs in oncology based on patient survival information , 2014, Cell Death and Disease.
[6] P. Jeggo,et al. DNA DSB repair pathway choice: an orchestrated handover mechanism. , 2014, The British journal of radiology.
[7] D. Adhikari,et al. The regulation of maturation promoting factor during prophase I arrest and meiotic entry in mammalian oocytes , 2014, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.
[8] H. Hermeking,et al. SNAIL and miR‐34a feed‐forward regulation of ZNF281/ZBP99 promotes epithelial–mesenchymal transition , 2013, The EMBO journal.
[9] I Celardo,et al. Senescence and aging: the critical roles of p53 , 2013, Oncogene.
[10] M. Kastan,et al. Nucleolin mediates nucleosome disruption critical for DNA double-strand break repair , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[11] M. Christmann,et al. Transcriptional regulation of human DNA repair genes following genotoxic stress: trigger mechanisms, inducible responses and genotoxic adaptation , 2013, Nucleic acids research.
[12] Gerry Melino,et al. Activation of miR200 by c-Myb depends on ZEB1 expression and miR200 promoter methylation , 2013, Cell cycle.
[13] M. Crescenzi,et al. The WRN and MUS81 proteins limit cell death and genome instability following oncogene activation , 2013, Oncogene.
[14] M. Ikura,et al. Transcriptional/epigenetic regulator CBP/p300 in tumorigenesis: structural and functional versatility in target recognition , 2013, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.
[15] W. Curran,et al. c-Myc suppression of DNA double-strand break repair. , 2012, Neoplasia.
[16] R. Knight,et al. MIRUMIR: an online tool to test microRNAs as biomarkers to predict survival in cancer using multiple clinical data sets , 2012, Cell Death and Differentiation.
[17] S. Powell,et al. Rad51 Paralog Complexes BCDX2 and CX3 Act at Different Stages in the BRCA1-BRCA2-Dependent Homologous Recombination Pathway , 2012, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[18] Charles Y. Lin,et al. Transcriptional Amplification in Tumor Cells with Elevated c-Myc , 2012, Cell.
[19] Julian Gingold,et al. Zfp281 mediates Nanog autorepression through recruitment of the NuRD complex and inhibits somatic cell reprogramming , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[20] G. Blandino,et al. Direct and delayed X‐ray‐induced DNA damage in male mouse germ cells , 2012, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.
[21] F. Markowetz,et al. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups , 2012, Nature.
[22] M. Paulsson,et al. Epidermal Transglutaminase (TGase 3) Is Required for Proper Hair Development, but Not the Formation of the Epidermal Barrier , 2012, PloS one.
[23] J. Piette,et al. Importance of PIKKs in NF-κB activation by genotoxic stress. , 2011, Biochemical pharmacology.
[24] Yen-Sin Ang,et al. Zfp281 Functions as a Transcriptional Repressor for Pluripotency of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells , 2011, Stem cells.
[25] A. Trumpp,et al. Genome-wide mapping of Myc binding and gene regulation in serum-stimulated fibroblasts , 2011, Oncogene.
[26] R. Bristow,et al. es that Control DNA Double-Strand Break Repair , 2010 .
[27] J. Bartek,et al. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease , 2009, Nature.
[28] Colleen D. McCabe,et al. Genome-wide promoter analysis of the SOX4 transcriptional network in prostate cancer cells. , 2009, Cancer research.
[29] David J. Chen,et al. Live cell imaging of XLF and XRCC4 reveals a novel view of protein assembly in the non-homologous end-joining pathway , 2008, Cell cycle.
[30] B. A. Ballif,et al. ATM and ATR Substrate Analysis Reveals Extensive Protein Networks Responsive to DNA Damage , 2007, Science.
[31] J. Bartek,et al. DNA damage checkpoints: from initiation to recovery or adaptation. , 2007, Current opinion in cell biology.
[32] J. Yates,et al. Large-Scale Identification of c-MYC-Associated Proteins Using a Combined TAP/MudPIT Approach , 2007, Cell cycle.
[33] D. Angelov,et al. Nucleolin is a histone chaperone with FACT‐like activity and assists remodeling of nucleosomes , 2006, The EMBO journal.
[34] E. Prochownik. c-Myc as a therapeutic target in cancer , 2004, Expert review of anticancer therapy.
[35] Chi V. Dang,et al. A strategy for identifying transcription factor binding sites reveals two classes of genomic c-Myc target sites , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[36] G. Evan,et al. Myc-Is this the oncogene from Hell? , 2002, Cancer cell.
[37] C. Dang,et al. Translocations involving c-myc and c-myc function , 2001, Oncogene.
[38] E. Prochownik,et al. Inverse regulation of cyclin B1 by c-Myc and p53 and induction of tetraploidy by cyclin B1 overexpression. , 2001, Cancer research.
[39] C. Wilson,et al. XRCC2 Is a Nuclear RAD51-like Protein Required for Damage-dependent RAD51 Focus Formation without the Need for ATP Binding* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[40] J. Bartek,et al. Pathways governing G1/S transition and their response to DNA damage , 2001, FEBS letters.
[41] J. Merchant,et al. ZBP-99 defines a conserved family of transcription factors and regulates ornithine decarboxylase gene expression. , 1999, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.
[42] B. Calabretta,et al. Targeting c-myc in leukemia. , 1997, Anti-cancer drug design.
[43] M. Reivich,et al. ACTIVATION , 1980, The Social Value of Zoos.
[44] David G Johnson,et al. Transcriptional and nontranscriptional functions of E2F1 in response to DNA damage. , 2012, Cancer research.
[45] R. Eisenman,et al. The Max transcription factor network: involvement of Mad in differentiation and an approach to identification of target genes. , 1994, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.