Transition regions: Regional–national eco-innovation systems and strategies

The key phenomenon around which the paper is constructed, given its core interest in the transition from a fossil fuels energy regime to a zero emissions and/or renewable energy regime (sometimes also ‘post-hydrocarbons’ regime; Smith, 2008), is the notion and explanation of ‘transition regions’. These are sub-national territories, usually with some degree of devolved governance in the fields of innovation, economic development and energy that, for reasons to be demonstrated, act as regional ‘lighthouses’ for eco-innovation both to other regions and countries. These are the places that are subject to ‘learning visits’ by global policy-makers and other interested parties eager to learn how success was achieved. Because regions differ within state-systems, the case material is presented according to three kinds of political model. These are, first, the liberal market model, notably north America and the UK; second is the co-ordinated market model such as Germany and some Nordic countries; and third hybrids which have a reasonably entrepreneurial economic climate typical of the ‘liberal market’ model but strong welfare states, more typical of the ‘co-ordinated market’ model such as Denmark, a small state, and China, a large one. Finally, each of six cases will be presented in the sequence of the ‘system’ and regional governance of ‘transition regions’ first, with the nature and role of the national eco-innovation regime summarised afterwards where top-down governmental influence is clearly visible, even weakly. Also eco-innovations that are broadly in the same field, such as renewable energy production, or electric vehicle consumption are studied, giving maximum comparative value from their emergence in different countries and regions.

[1]  J. Jensen,et al.  Networks as Tools for Sustainable Urban Development , 2004 .

[2]  P. Cooke Cleantech and an Analysis of the Platform Nature of Life Sciences: Further Reflections upon Platform Policies , 2008 .

[3]  Rong Qin,et al.  Industrial sustainability in China: practice and prospects for eco-industrial development. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Analysing the breakthrough of rock ‘n’ roll (1930–1970) Multi-regime interaction and reconfiguration in the multi-level perspective , 2007 .

[5]  Ron Martin,et al.  The Place of Path Dependence in an Evolutionary Perspective on the Economic Landscape , 2010 .

[6]  R. Martin,et al.  Path dependence and regional economic evolution , 2006 .

[7]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Path Creation as a Process of Mindful Deviation , 2013 .

[8]  Elizabeth Garnsey,et al.  Speciation through entrepreneurial spin-off: The Acorn-ARM story , 2008 .

[9]  S. Giguère,et al.  Breaking out of policy silos : doing more with less , 2010 .

[10]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Development in China: A Review , 2010 .

[11]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: development opportunities from the ‘green turn’ , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[12]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[13]  W. Arthur,et al.  The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II , 1988 .

[14]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The emergence of a growth industry: a comparative analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish wind turbine industries , 2003 .

[15]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[16]  Keith Smith,et al.  The challenge of environmental technology: promoting radical innovation in conditions of lock-in. Final report to the Garnaut Climate Change Review , 2008 .

[17]  Judith Lipp,et al.  Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom , 2007 .

[18]  John H. Holland,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity , 1995 .

[19]  Gregory C. Unruh Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[20]  J. Jacobs,et al.  The Economy of Cities , 1969 .

[21]  John Archibald Wheeler,et al.  At Home in the Universe , 1994 .

[22]  Gregory C. Unruh Escaping carbon lock-in , 2002 .

[23]  R. Martin Regional Economic Resilience, Hysteresis and Recessionary Shocks , 2012 .

[24]  P. Cooke Socio-technical Transitions and Varieties of Capitalism: Green Regional Innovation and Distinctive Market Niches , 2010 .

[25]  K. Frenken,et al.  Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth , 2007 .

[26]  C. Folke RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES , 2006 .

[27]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Co-evolutionary and multi-level dynamics in transitions: The transformation of aviation systems and the shift from propeller to turbojet (1930–1970) , 2006 .

[28]  J. Diamond Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed , 2005 .

[29]  J. Diamond Collapse : how societies choose to fail or survive , 2005 .

[30]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .