Cellular‐automaton fluids: A model for flow in porous media

Numerical models of fluid flow through porous media can be developed from either microscopic or macroscopic properties. The large‐scale viewpoint is perhaps the most prevalent. Darcy’s law relates the chief macroscopic parameters of interest—flow rate, permeability, viscosity, and pressure gradient—and may be invoked to solve for any of these parameters when the others are known. In practical situations, however, this solution may not be possible. Attention is then typically focused on the estimation of permeability, and numerous numerical methods based on knowledge of the microscopic pore‐space geometry have been proposed. Because the intrinsic inhomogeneity of porous media makes the application of proper boundary conditions difficult, microscopic flow calculations have typically been achieved with idealized arrays of geometrically simple pores, throats, and cracks. I propose here an attractive alternative which can freely and accurately model fluid flow in grossly irregular geometries. This new method s...

[1]  Tommaso Toffoli,et al.  Cellular Automata as an Alternative to (Rather than an Approximation of) Differential Equations in M , 1984 .

[2]  Y. Pomeau,et al.  Time evolution of a two‐dimensional model system. I. Invariant states and time correlation functions , 1973 .

[3]  Christopher J. C. Burges,et al.  Buoyant Mixtures of Cellular Automaton Gases , 1987, Complex Syst..

[4]  Y. Pomeau,et al.  Molecular dynamics of a classical lattice gas: Transport properties and time correlation functions , 1976 .

[5]  W. Daniel Hillis,et al.  Turbulence in fluid dynamics , 1987, Nature.

[6]  J. Ward,et al.  Turbulent Flow in Porous Media , 1964 .

[7]  M. S. Paterson,et al.  The equivalent channel model for permeability and resistivity in fluid-saturated rock—A re-appraisal , 1983 .

[8]  J. B. Walsh,et al.  The effect of pressure on porosity and the transport properties of rock , 1984 .

[9]  J. Koplik,et al.  Conductivity and permeability from microgeometry , 1984 .

[10]  J. Bear Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media , 1975 .

[11]  Y. Pomeau,et al.  Lattice-gas automata for the Navier-Stokes equation. , 1986, Physical review letters.

[12]  James G. Berryman,et al.  Use of digital image analysis to estimate fluid permeability of porous materials: Application of two-point correlation functions , 1986 .

[13]  Margolus,et al.  Cellular-automata supercomputers for fluid-dynamics modeling. , 1986, Physical review letters.

[14]  D. d'Humières,et al.  Lattice gas automata for fluid mechanics , 1986 .

[15]  Joel Koplik,et al.  Conductivity and permeability of rocks , 1984 .

[16]  F. Reif,et al.  Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics , 1965 .

[17]  G. Pirie,et al.  Low permeability rocks: Laboratory measurements and three‐dimensional microstructural analysis , 1986 .

[18]  L. Kadanoff On Two Levels , 1986 .

[19]  Morrel H. Cohen,et al.  Quantitative methods for microgeometric modeling , 1982 .

[20]  Daniel H. Rothman,et al.  Modeling seismic P-Waves with cellular automata , 1987 .

[21]  D. Tritton,et al.  Physical Fluid Dynamics , 1977 .

[22]  W. Daniel Hillis,et al.  The connection machine , 1985 .

[23]  Adrian E. Scheidegger,et al.  The physics of flow through porous media , 1957 .

[24]  U. Frisch,et al.  Lattice gas models for 3D hydrodynamics , 1986 .

[25]  G. Vichniac Simulating physics with cellular automata , 1984 .