Towards Interactive Geodata Analysis through a Combination of Domain-Specific Languages and 3D Geo Applications in a Web Portal Environment

Urban planning processes affect a wide range of stakeholders including decision makers, urban planners, business companies as well as citizens. ICT-enabled tools supporting urban planning are considered key to successful and sustainable urban management. Based on previous work in the areas of web-based participation tools for urban planning, rule-based geospatial processing as well as 3D virtual reality applications we present a tool that supports experts from municipalities in planning and decision making but also provides a way for the public to engage in urban planning processes. The main contribution of this work is in the combination of 3D visualization and interaction components with a new ontology-driven rule editor based on domain-specific languages. The 3D visualization, on the one hand, enables stakeholders to present and discuss urban plans. On the other hand, the rule editor particularly targets expert users who need to perform spatial analyses on urban data or want to configure the 3D scene according to custom rules. Compared to previous approaches we propose a portable and interactive solution. Our tool is web-based and uses HTML5 technology making it accessible by a broad audience.

[1]  Martin Fowler,et al.  Domain-Specific Languages , 2010, The Addison-Wesley signature series.

[2]  Jochen Renz,et al.  Qualitative Spatial Reasoning with Topological Information , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[3]  Robert G. Raskin,et al.  Knowledge representation in the semantic web for Earth and environmental terminology (SWEET) , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[4]  Zaheer Abbas Khan,et al.  Domain-Specific Languages For Agile Urban Policy Modelling , 2013, ECMS.

[5]  Michael Zöllner,et al.  X3DOM: a DOM-based HTML5/X3D integration model , 2009, Web3D '09.

[6]  Gang Wang,et al.  Design and development of Distributed Virtual Geographic Environment system based on web services , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[7]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  When owl: sameAs Isn't the Same: An Analysis of Identity in Linked Data , 2010, SEMWEB.

[8]  M. Dodge,et al.  The potential of Web-based mapping and virtual reality technologies for modelling urban environments , 1998 .

[9]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  Thoughts on the complex relation between linked data, semantic annotations, and ontologies , 2013, ESAIR '13.

[10]  Eva Klien,et al.  The Role of Spatial Relations in Automating the Semantic Annotation of Geodata , 2005, COSIT.

[11]  Glen Hart,et al.  Geospatial semantics and linked spatiotemporal data - Past, present, and future , 2012, Semantic Web.

[12]  Eva Klien,et al.  A Rule‐Based Strategy for the Semantic Annotation of Geodata , 2007, Trans. GIS.

[13]  Jens Dambruch,et al.  Leveraging public participation in urban planning with 3D web technology , 2014, Web3D '14.

[14]  Thorsten Reitz,et al.  An Environment for the Conceptual Harmonisation of Geospatial Schemas and Data , 2012 .

[15]  Kheir Al-Kodmany,et al.  Visualization Tools and Methods in Community Planning: From Freehand Sketches to Virtual Reality , 2002 .

[16]  Andreas Stein,et al.  Automated urban management processes: integrating a graphical editor for modular domain-specific languages into a 3D GIS , 2014 .