The Role of Perceptual Load in Object Recognition

Predictions from perceptual load theory (Lavie, 19952005) regarding object recognition across the same or different viewpoints were tested. Results showed that high perceptual load reduces distracter recognition levels despite always presenting distracter objects from the same view. They also showed that the levels of distracter recognition were unaffected by a change in the distracter object view under conditions of low perceptual load. These results were found both with repetition priming measures of distracter recognition and with performance on a surprise recognition memory test. The results support load theory proposals that distracter recognition critically depends on the level of perceptual load. The implications for the role of attention in object recognition theories are discussed.

[1]  N. Lavie,et al.  High Perceptual Load Makes Everybody Equal , 2007, Psychological science.

[2]  I. Biederman.  Recognizing depth-rotated objects: a review of recent research and theory. , 2000, Spatial vision.

[3]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  M. Tarr,et al.  Visual object recognition: do we know more now than we did 20 years ago? , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  N. Lavie,et al.  On the Efficiency of Visual Selective Attention: Efficient Visual Search Leads to Inefficient Distractor Rejection , 1997 .

[7]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Task coordination between and within sensory modalities: Effects on distraction , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness , 2007, Cognition.

[9]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: An electrophysiological analysis , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  N. Lavie.  Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  C M Francolini,et al.  On the nonautomaticity of “automatic” activation: Evidence of selective seeing , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  C D Frith,et al.  Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. , 1997, Science.

[13]  Jon Driver,et al.  On the nonselectivity of "selective" seeing: Contrasts between interference and priming in selective attention. , 1989 .

[14]  J. Hummel.  Complementary solutions to the binding problem in vision: Implications for shape perception and object recognition , 2001 .

[15]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  The role of perceptual load in visual awareness , 2006, Brain Research.

[16]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.

[18]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[19]  J. Hummel,et al.  The role of attention in priming for left-right reflections of object images: evidence for a dual representation of object shape. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Manila Vannucci,et al.  Category Effects on the Processing of Plane-Rotated Objects , 2000, Perception.

[21]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Information integration in perception and communication , 1996 .

[22]  Ana Torralbo,et al.  Perceptual-Load-Induced Selection as a Result of Local Competitive Interactions in Visual Cortex , 2008, Psychological science.

[23]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Look here but ignore what you see: effects of distractors at fixation. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  R. Dolan,et al.  Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  The spatial frame of reference in object naming and discrimination of left-right reflections , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[27]  J. Murray,et al.  Imagining and naming rotated natural objects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  H. Egeth,et al.  Failure of spatial selectivity in vision , 1978 .

[29]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Load Induced Blindness , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[31]  A. Treisman.  Strategies and models of selective attention. , 1969, Psychological review.

[32]  J. Hummel,et al.  An architecture for rapid, hierarchical structural description , 1996 .

[33]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Push-pull mechanism of selective attention in human extrastriate cortex. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  I. Rock,et al.  The effect of inattention on form perception. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Janice E. Murray,et al.  Is entry-level recognition viewpoint invariant or viewpoint dependent? , 1998 .

[37]  N. Lavie.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional set interacts with perceptual load in visual search , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  J. Murray,et al.  Negative priming by rotated objects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  J. Deutsch.  Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[41]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[42]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Perceptual load modulates conscious flicker perception. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[43]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Unconscious orientation processing depends on perceptual load. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[44]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[45]  I. Biederman,et al.  Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  J. Murray,et al.  Orientation-specific effects in picture matching and naming , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[47]  N. Lavie,et al.  The Role of Perceptual Load in Processing Distractor Faces , 2003, Psychological science.

[48]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Orientation-invariant transfer of training in the identification of rotated natural objects , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[49]  M. Tarr,et al.  Visual Object Recognition , 1996, ISTCS.

[50]  Irving Biederman,et al.  Invariance of long-term visual priming to scale, reflection, translation, and hemisphere , 2001, Vision Research.

[51]  N. Lavie,et al.  Failures to Ignore Entirely Irrelevant Distractors , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[52]  A. Treisman,et al.  Selective Attention: Perception or Response? , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[53]  N Lavie,et al.  The role of perceptual load in negative priming. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  On the effiency of attentional selection: Efficient visual search results in inefficient rejection of distraction , 1997 .

[55]  J. Seamon,et al.  A mere exposure effect for transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of reflection, size, or color changes on affect and recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[56]  Martin Eimer,et al.  An ERP study of sustained spatial attention to stimulus eccentricity , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[57]  D. Navon.  Resources—a theoretical soup stone? , 1984 .

[58]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[59]  B. Bahrami,et al.  Attentional Load Modulates Responses of Human Primary Visual Cortex to Invisible Stimuli , 2007, Current Biology.

[60]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Reference frame and effects of orientation on finding the tops of rotated objects. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  J. Davidoff,et al.  Article Title: Priming of Depth-rotated Objects Depends on Attention and Part Running Head: Priming of Depth-rotated Objects Priming of Depth-rotated Objects Depends on Attention and Part Changes , 2022 .

[62]  U. Neisser,et al.  Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[63]  G. Woodman,et al.  Neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[64]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[65]  S. Tipper.  The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[66]  M Eimer,et al.  Attending to quadrants and ring-shaped regions: ERP effects of visual attention in different spatial selection tasks. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[67]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Selective attention and cognitive control: dissociating attentional functions through different types of load , 1998 .