Methods and Applications of the Audibility Index in Hearing Aid Selection and Fitting
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H Dillon. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[2] K. D. Kryter. Validation of the Articulation Index , 1962 .
[3] V Viljanen,et al. Acoustic conditions for speech communication in classrooms. , 1991, Scandinavian audiology.
[4] L.L. Beranek,et al. The Design of Speech Communication Systems , 1947, Proceedings of the IRE.
[5] J. Punch,et al. Probe Microphone Measurements: Hearing Aid Selection and Assessment , 1992 .
[6] Robyn M. Cox,et al. The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit , 1995 .
[7] K. D. Kryter. PROPOSED METHODS FOR THE CALCULATION OF THE ARTICULATION INDEX , 1961 .
[8] A. Neuman,et al. Children's perception of speech in reverberation. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] C V Pavlovic,et al. Articulation index predictions of speech intelligibility in hearing aid selection. , 1988, ASHA.
[10] J. C. Webster. Interpretations of speech and noise characteristics of NTID learning centers , 1979 .
[11] P. Newall,et al. Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. , 1990, Ear and hearing.
[12] J Jerger,et al. Speech understanding in the elderly. , 1989, Ear and hearing.
[13] M W Skinner,et al. Speech intelligibility in noise-induced hearing loss: effects of high-frequency compensation. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] G R Popelka,et al. Factors which Affect Measures of Speech Audibility with: Hearing Aids , 1987, Ear and hearing.
[15] G A Studebaker,et al. Evaluating relative speech recognition performance using the proficiency factor and rationalized arcsine differences. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[16] H. Levitt,et al. Phoneme errors on a nonsense syllable test , 1975 .
[17] D Byrne. Effects of frequency response characteristics on speech discrimination and perceived intelligibility and pleasantness of speech for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] S. Gordon-Salant,et al. Accuracy of speech intelligibility index predictions for noise-masked young listeners with normal hearing and for elderly listeners with hearing impairment. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[19] T Houtgast,et al. A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] G A Studebaker,et al. Age-related changes in monosyllabic word recognition performance when audibility is held constant. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[21] C V Pavlovic,et al. Frequency importance functions for a feature recognition test material. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] B Kollmeier,et al. The effect of multichannel dynamic compression on speech intelligibility. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] W. R. Farrell,et al. Speech Privacy in Buildings , 1962 .
[24] D Byrne,et al. Maximizing Effective Audibility in Hearing Aid Fitting , 2001, Ear and hearing.
[25] C V Pavlovic,et al. Transfer functions and correction factors used in hearing aid evaluation and research. , 1989, Ear and hearing.
[26] Mead C. Killion. New Thinking on Hearing in Noise: A Generalized Articulation Index , 2002 .
[27] Gerald A. Studebaker,et al. Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance , 1992 .
[28] T. Houtgast,et al. A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria , 1985 .
[29] H. Dillon,et al. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.
[30] D D Dirks,et al. Frequency-importance functions for words in high- and low-context sentences. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[31] R Carhart,et al. An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55. , 1966, [Technical report] SAM-TR. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine.
[32] G R Popelka,et al. Neural presbycusis: a diagnostic dilemma. , 1992, The American journal of otology.
[33] R. M. Sachs,et al. Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] C V Pavlovic. Speech spectrum considerations and speech intelligibility predictions in hearing aid evaluations. , 1989, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[35] D D Dirks,et al. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] B. Moore,et al. A Test for the Diagnosis of Dead Regions in the Cochlea , 2000, British journal of audiology.
[37] R Plomp,et al. The effect of linguistic entropy on speech perception in noise in young and elderly listeners. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] A. Nabelek,et al. Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] Z Hou,et al. A Model to Evaluate and Maximize Hearing Aid Performance by Integrating the Articulation Index Across Listening Conditions , 1994, Ear and hearing.
[40] L Magnusson,et al. Predicted and Measured Speech Recognition Performance in Noise with Linear Amplification , 2001, Ear and hearing.
[41] Christine M. Rankovic. An Application of the Articulation Index to Hearing Aid Fitting , 1991 .
[42] L E Humes,et al. Evaluation of the use of a new compact disc for auditory perceptual assessment in the elderly. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[43] C V Pavlovic,et al. Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[44] B. Moore. Dead Regions in the Cochlea: Diagnosis, Perceptual Consequences, and Implications for the Fitting of Hearing Aids , 2001, Trends in amplification.
[45] C M Reed,et al. Hearing aids--a review of past research on linear amplification, amplitude compression, and frequency lowering. , 1979, ASHA monographs.
[46] D D Dirks,et al. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. I: The contribution of selected frequency regions. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[47] L E Humes,et al. Understanding the speech-understanding problems of the hearing impaired. , 1991, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[48] Harvey Fletcher,et al. The Perception of Speech Sounds by Deafened Persons , 1952 .
[49] M. Liberman,et al. Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves , 1984, Hearing Research.
[50] Harvey Fletcher,et al. Speech and hearing in communication, 2nd ed. , 1953 .
[51] B C Moore,et al. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. , 1996, Ear and hearing.
[52] P E Souza,et al. Effect of preferred volume setting on speech audibility in different hearing aid circuits. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[53] D J Van Tasell,et al. Effect of Peak Clipping on Speech Recognition Threshold , 1994, Ear and hearing.
[54] S. Bacon,et al. Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[55] C. Turner,et al. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[56] L E Humes,et al. Evaluation of two clinical versions of the articulation index. , 1992, Ear and hearing.
[57] Todd A. Ricketts,et al. Making Sense of Directional Microphone Hearing Aids , 1999 .
[58] C V Pavlovic,et al. Derivation of primary parameters and procedures for use in speech intelligibility predictions. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[59] T. Houtgast,et al. Predicting speech intelligibility in rooms from the modulation transfer function, I. General room acoustics , 1980 .
[60] G A Studebaker. The effect of equating loudness on audibility-based hearing aid selection procedures. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[61] Harvey Dillon,et al. NAL-NL1: A new procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids , 1999 .
[62] A M Amlani,et al. Efficacy of directional microphone hearing aids: a meta-analytic perspective. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[63] G. A. Miller. The Perception of Speech. , 1951 .
[64] Margaret W. Skinner,et al. Hearing Aid Evaluation , 1988 .
[65] G A Studebaker,et al. Frequency-importance and transfer functions for the Auditec of St. Louis recordings of the NU-6 word test. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[66] L E Humes,et al. Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[67] Vern O. Knudsen. THE HEARING OF SPEECH IN AUDITORIUMS , 1929 .
[68] C W Turner,et al. Quantifying the contribution of audibility to recognition of compression-amplified speech. , 1999, Ear and hearing.
[69] M A Nerbonne,et al. Communication Screening Profile: Use with Elderly Clients , 1982, Ear and hearing.
[70] G A Studebaker,et al. Frequency-importance and transfer functions for recorded CID W-22 word lists. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[71] Patricia McCarthy. Self‐assessment revisited , 1998 .
[72] P E Souza,et al. Improving audibility with nonlinear amplification for listeners with high-frequency loss. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[73] M. Kringlebotn,et al. A graphical method for calculating the speech intelligibility index and measuring hearing disability from audiograms. , 1999, Scandinavian audiology.
[74] J. Allen,et al. Loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands (LGOB)--a procedure for the assessment of loudness. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[75] J. Dubno,et al. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[76] C V Pavlovic,et al. An articulation index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired individuals. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[77] Patricia McCarthy. Self-Assessment Inventories: Theyʼre Not Just For Aural Rehab Anymore! , 1994 .
[78] M. Robb,et al. Audibility and recognition of stop consonants in normal and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[79] H Müsch,et al. Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. I. Model structure. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[80] Louis D. Braida,et al. Evaluating the articulation index for auditory-visual input. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[81] D Byrne. Effects of bandwidth and stimulus type on most comfortable loudness levels of hearing-impaired listeners. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[82] Pavlovic Cv. Articulation index predictions of speech intelligibility in hearing aid selection. , 1988 .
[83] L E Humes,et al. An evaluation of several rationales for selecting hearing aid gain. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[84] G Keidser,et al. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[85] Dianne J. Van Tasell,et al. Hearing Loss, Speech, and Hearing Aids , 1993 .
[86] C. P. Janota,et al. Frequency importance functions for words, sentences, and continuous discourse. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[87] Arthur Boothroyd,et al. Developments in Speech Audiometry , 1968 .
[88] B. Moore,et al. The Use of Psychophysical Tuning Curves to Explore Dead Regions in the Cochlea , 2001, Ear and hearing.
[89] D Byrne,et al. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[90] J. Moncur,et al. Binaural and monaural speech intelligibility in reverberation. , 1967, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[91] K. D. Kryter. Methods for the Calculation and Use of the Articulation Index , 1962 .
[92] Michael Valente,et al. Strategies for Selecting and Verifying Hearing Aid Fittings. , 1994 .
[93] T W Tillman,et al. Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[94] J. Pickett,et al. Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[95] J. W. Black,et al. Equally contributing frequency bands in intelligibility testing. , 1959, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[96] H Müsch,et al. Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. II. Measurement and prediction of consonant-discrimination performance. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[97] D. Schum,et al. Actual and predicted word-recognition performance of elderly hearing-impaired listeners. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[98] M Valente. Use of Microphone Technology to Improve User Performance in Noise , 1999, Trends in amplification.
[99] L D Braida,et al. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[100] D. M. Green,et al. The effect of vocabulary size on articulation score , 1958 .
[101] R C Seewald,et al. The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[102] P E Souza,et al. Fitting hearing aids with the Articulation Index: impact on hearing aid effectiveness. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[103] L. Humes,et al. Speech-recognition difficulties of the hearing-impaired elderly: the contributions of audibility. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[104] W A Cooper,et al. Combining auditory and visual stimuli in the adaptive testing of speech discrimination. , 1978, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[105] W. H. Sumby,et al. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise , 1954 .
[106] R M Cox,et al. Measuring Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life: the SADL scale. , 1999, Ear and hearing.
[107] G. Studebaker. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[108] Holcomb Lm,et al. Articulation index and hearing handicap. , 2000 .
[109] H. K. Dunn,et al. Statistical Measurements on Conversational Speech , 1940 .
[110] Arthur Boothroyd,et al. Room Acoustics and Speech Perception , 2004 .
[111] Mead C. Killion. The SIN report: Circuits haven't solved the hearing‐in‐noise problem , 1997 .
[112] C W Turner,et al. Multichannel compression, temporal cues, and audibility. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[113] H. Fletcher,et al. The Perception of Speech and Its Relation to Telephony , 1950 .
[114] S M Abel,et al. The role of high-frequency hearing in age-related speech understanding deficits , 2000, Scandinavian audiology.
[115] J. C. Steinberg,et al. Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1945 .
[116] D D Dirks,et al. Application of the Articulation Index and the Speech Transmission Index to the recognition of speech by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[117] P M Zurek,et al. Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[118] A A Montgomery,et al. Auditory and visual contributions to the perception of consonants. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[119] I. Hirsh,et al. Development of materials for speech audiometry. , 1952, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[120] C V Pavlovic. Band Importance Functions for Audiological Applications , 1994, Ear and hearing.
[121] D. Pascoe,et al. Clinical Implications of Nonverbal Methods of Hearing Aid Selection and Fitting , 1980 .
[122] L Magnusson,et al. Predicting the speech recognition performance of elderly individuals with sensorineural hearing impairment. A procedure based on the Speech Intelligibility Index. , 1996, Scandinavian audiology.
[123] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of reverberation and noise on the intelligibility of sentences in cases of presbyacusis. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[124] G. Studebaker,et al. Intensity-importance functions for bandlimited monosyllabic words. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[125] C. Turner,et al. Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. , 1999, American journal of audiology.
[126] N. P. Erber. Interaction of audition and vision in the recognition of oral speech stimuli. , 1969, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[127] C V Pavlovic,et al. A frequency importance function for continuous discourse. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[128] D D Dirks,et al. Speech recognition and the Articulation Index for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[129] H. Fletcher. Relation Between Loudness and Masking , 1937 .
[130] L E Humes,et al. Application of the articulation index to the speech recognition of normal and impaired listeners wearing hearing protection. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[131] A. M. Mimpen,et al. Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[132] G. Studebaker,et al. Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[133] D Byrne. Key issues in hearing aid selection and evaluation. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[134] R Plomp,et al. The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[135] A. Nabelek,et al. Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[136] J. P. Egan. Articulation testing methods , 1948, The Laryngoscope.
[137] Herman J. M. Steeneken,et al. Mutual dependence of the octave-band weights in predicting speech intelligibility , 1999, Speech Commun..
[138] James F. Willott,et al. Aging and the Auditory System: Anatomy, Physiology, and Psychophysics , 1991 .
[139] J M Festen,et al. Considerations on adaptive gain and frequency response in hearing aids. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.
[140] Edgar Villchur. Comments on ‘‘The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation‐transfer function’’ [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 2322–2327 (1988)] , 1989 .
[141] C V Pavlovic,et al. An evaluation of some assumptions underlying the articulation index. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[142] D A Fabry,et al. Evaluation of an articulation-index based model for predicting the effects of adaptive frequency response hearing aids. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[143] P G Stelmachowicz,et al. A Comparison of Threshold‐Based Fitting Strategies for Nonlinear Hearing Aids , 1998, Ear and hearing.
[144] M A Nerbonne,et al. Articulation index and hearing handicap. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[145] R Leavitt,et al. Speech degradation as measured by the Rapid Speech Transmission Index (RASTI). , 1991, Ear and hearing.
[146] T. Houtgast,et al. The Modulation Transfer Function in Room Acoustics as a Predictor of Speech Intelligibility , 1973 .
[147] Mead C. Killion,et al. The case of the missing dots: Al and SNR loss , 1998 .
[148] R M Cox,et al. Development of the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test for hearing aid comparisons. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.