Determining the Interruptible Load with Strategic Behavior in a Competitive Electricity Market

In a deregulated market, independent system operators meet power balance based on supply and demand bids to maximize social welfare. Since electricity markets are typically oligopolies, players with market power may withhold capacity to maximize profit. Such exercise of market power can lead to various problems, including increased electricity prices, and hence lower social welfare. Here we propose an approach to maximize social welfare and prevent the exercising of market power by means of interruptible loads in a competitive market environment. Our approach enables management of the market power by analyzing the benefit to the companies of capacity withdrawal and scheduling resources with interruptible loads. Our formulation shows that we can prevent power companies and demand-resource owners from exercising market powers. The oligopolistic conditions are described using the Cournot model to reflect the capacity withdrawal in electricity markets. The numerical results confirm the effectiveness of proposed method, via a comparison of perfect competition and oligopoly scenarios. Our approach provides reductions in market-clearing prices, increases in social welfare, and more equal distribution of surpluses between players.

[1]  E. Bompard,et al.  The Demand Elasticity Impacts on the Strategic Bidding Behavior of the Electricity Producers , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  M. P. Moghaddam,et al.  Flexible demand response programs modeling in competitive electricity markets , 2011 .

[3]  Lorna A. Greening,et al.  Demand response resources: Who is responsible for implementation in a deregulated market? , 2010 .

[4]  Mohsen Parsa Moghadam,et al.  Optimal demand response program for active market power reduction , 2013, 2013 21st Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE).

[5]  M. Parsa Moghaddam,et al.  Modeling and prioritizing demand response programs in power markets , 2010 .

[6]  Ettore Francesco Bompard,et al.  The Impacts of Price Responsiveness on Strategic Equilibrium in Competitive Electricity Markets , 2007 .

[7]  G.R. Yousefi,et al.  Demand Response model considering EDRP and TOU programs , 2008, 2008 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition.

[8]  D. Kirschen,et al.  Factoring the elasticity of demand in electricity prices , 2000 .

[9]  Kathleen L. Spees,et al.  Demand Response and Electricity Market Efficiency , 2007 .

[10]  Juan M. Morales,et al.  Real-Time Demand Response Model , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[11]  D. Kirschen,et al.  Quantifying the Effect of Demand Response on Electricity Markets , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Mohammed H. Albadi,et al.  A summary of demand response in electricity markets , 2008 .

[13]  Le Xie,et al.  Coupon Incentive-Based Demand Response: Theory and Case Study , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Ettore Francesco Bompard,et al.  Micro-economic analysis of the physical constrained markets: game theory application to competitive electricity markets , 2005 .

[15]  Roy Jensen,et al.  Power System Economics , 1983 .

[16]  E. Bompard,et al.  Network constraint impacts on the competitive electricity markets under supply-side strategic bidding , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  G. Strbac,et al.  Framework for the incorporation of demand-side in a competitive electricity market , 1996 .

[18]  D. L. Pepyne,et al.  Gaming and Price Spikes in Electric Power Markets , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[19]  Thomas Ackermann,et al.  Distributed resources and re-regulated electricity markets , 2007 .

[20]  M. Haghifam,et al.  A demand response based solution for LMP management in power markets , 2011 .

[21]  P. Klemperer,et al.  Supply Function Equilibria in Oligopoly under Uncertainty , 1989 .

[22]  James F. Wilson Scarcity, Market Power, and Price Caps in Wholesale Electric Power Markets , 2000 .