Users’ influence on inter-organizational innovation: mapping the receptive context

Purpose Innovation is constantly present in the construction industry, however, mainly on a single project level. Initiating and implementing inter-organizational innovation in a multi-project context such as in urban development entails large complexity, for example, because of the many interdependent projects and users of innovation. The users’ influence on inter-organizational innovation in a multi-project context has not been fully explored. Accordingly, the purpose of this paper is to discuss how users influence inter-organizational innovation in multi-project contexts by mapping the receptiveness for change. Design/methodology/approach A single case study approach was used, where empirical material including semi-structured interviews in combination with meeting observations, document studies and participative workshops were gathered. The rich empirical material, studying inter-organizational innovation in an urban development context, was mapped based on the receptive context for change framework. Findings A receptive context for change was not present in the studied multi-project context. Communication to develop and implement inter-organizational innovation was not sufficient and the clients’ procurement strategies were to a large extent not developed to facilitate inter-organizational innovation. Findings show differences in users’ possibility and aim to implement inter-organizational innovation. Originality/value The mapping of the receptive context to influence inter-organizational innovation widens the knowledge base and provides valuable insights on how inter-organizational innovation may be implemented in the loosely coupled construction industry. Furthermore, the findings broaden the discussion on clients as innovation supporters, and contribute to the debate on clients as innovation supporters, by highlighting the importance of distinguishing between different types of clients.

[1]  B. Burnes Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal , 2004 .

[2]  D. Gann,et al.  Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems , 2000 .

[3]  Viktoria Sundquist,et al.  Renewal in construction projects: tracing effects of client requirements , 2016 .

[4]  Monty Sutrisna,et al.  Modelling knowledge integration process in early contractor involvement procurement at tender stage – a Western Australian case study , 2017 .

[5]  Toke Bjerregaard Industry and academia in convergence: Micro-institutional dimensions of R&D collaboration , 2010 .

[6]  Dilanthi Amaratunga,et al.  Client’s championing characteristics that promote construction innovation , 2011 .

[7]  F. Veloso,et al.  Interfirm Innovation under Uncertainty: Empirical Evidence for Strategic Knowledge Partitioning* , 2008 .

[8]  Henrik Szentes,et al.  Managing the tensions between exploration and exploitation in large construction projects , 2017 .

[9]  Graham Winch,et al.  Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction , 1998 .

[10]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Managing inter-institutional projects: The significance of isochronism, timing norms and temporal misfits , 2011 .

[11]  David O'Sullivan,et al.  MANAGING WITHIN DISTRIBUTED INNOVATION NETWORKS , 2007 .

[12]  Henrik Szentes,et al.  The Role of Co-Creation in Enhancing Explorative and Exploitative Learning in Project-Based Settings , 2017 .

[13]  Chris Ivory,et al.  The cult of customer responsiveness: is design innovation the price of a client‐focused construction industry? , 2005 .

[14]  R. Bakker Taking Stock of Temporary Organizational Forms : A Systematic Review and Research , 2010 .

[15]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Making Innovation Happen in a Megaproject: London's Crossrail Suburban Railway System , 2014 .

[16]  Malena Ingemansson,et al.  The Logic of Innovation in Construction , 2014 .

[17]  Graeme D. Larsen,et al.  Understanding the early stages of the innovation diffusion process: awareness, influence and communication networks , 2011 .

[18]  Karen Manley,et al.  Key influences on construction innovation , 2004 .

[19]  Natalia Levina,et al.  Collaborating on Multi-Party Information Systems Development Projects: A Collective Reflection-in-Action View , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  Shaping Strategic Change: The Case of the NHS in the 1980s , 1992 .

[21]  A. Edmondson,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL FIT IN MANAGEMENT FIELD RESEARCH. , 2007 .

[22]  Stephen Emmitt,et al.  Diffusion of a systemic innovation: a longitudinal case study of a Swedish multi-storey timber housebuilding system , 2017 .

[23]  Martin Loosemore,et al.  Construction Innovation: Fifth Generation Perspective , 2015 .

[24]  S. Shortell,et al.  Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. , 2001, The Milbank quarterly.

[25]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[26]  Elaine M. Bailey,et al.  Diagnosing Unforeseeable Uncertainty in a New Venture , 2007 .

[27]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  Innovation Alignment and Project Network Dynamics: An Integrative Model for Change , 2007 .

[28]  Mats Engwall,et al.  The resource allocation syndrome: the prime challenge of multi-project management? , 2003 .

[29]  K. Manley,et al.  Motivation toward financial incentive goals on construction projects , 2011 .

[30]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation , 2002 .

[31]  S. Manning Embedding Projects in Multiple Contexts: A Structuration Perspective , 2010 .

[32]  Beliz Ozorhon,et al.  Analysis of Construction Innovation Process at Project Level , 2013 .

[33]  Per Erik Eriksson,et al.  Exploration and exploitation in project-based organizations: Development and diffusion of knowledge at different organizational levels in construction companies , 2013 .

[34]  J. Rodney Turner,et al.  The management of innovation in project-based firms , 2000 .

[35]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  Knowledge-Sharing Dilemmas , 2002 .

[36]  Pernille Smith,et al.  Boundary emergence in inter-organizational innovation: The influence of strategizing, identification and sensemaking , 2016 .

[37]  Hans Voordijk,et al.  Perceptions of success in performance-based procurement: Differences between clients and contractors , 2015 .