Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments

The use of authentic activities within online learning environments has been shown to have many benefits for learners in online units and courses. There has been renewed interest in the role of student activities within course units, as constructivist philosophy and advances in technology impact on educational design and practice. Courses based on these principles have been used successfully across a wide variety of discipline areas. In spite of the growing evidence of the success of authentic learning environments, they are not without their problems. In this paper we discuss patterns of engagement that have emerged from our own research on authentic learning tasks, in particular, the initial reluctance to willingly immerse in learning scenarios that some students experience, and the need for the suspension of disbelief before engaging in the task. The paper proposes ten characteristics of authentic activities, based on educational theory and research, which have been used as criteria for the selection of existing online units or courses for in depth investigation. The paper includes a short review of the literature, a description of the research and some preliminary findings and identification of issues related to the necessity for students to willingly suspend disbelief in order to fully engage in learning scenarios based on authentic tasks.

[1]  Lynne Hunt,et al.  Authentic transitions: The click around ECU online transition to university programs , 2002 .

[2]  J. Petraglia The real world on a short leash: The (mis) application of constructivism to the design of educational technology , 1998 .

[3]  Donn Ritchie,et al.  Using multimedia to overcome the problems with problem based learning , 1997 .

[4]  Margaret Taplin Problem-based learning in distance education: Practitioners' beliefs about an action learning project , 2000 .

[5]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  A co-evolutionary model for supporting the emergence of authenticity , 2000 .

[6]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Authentic activities and online learning , 2002 .

[7]  Meg O'Reilly,et al.  Reinvigorating educational design for an online world , 2000 .

[8]  D. Challis Integrating the conceptual and practice worlds : a case study from Architecture , 2002 .

[9]  Frank Bullen,et al.  Design and construction of a formula SAE racecar in a teaching and research framework , 2002 .

[10]  Jan Herrington,et al.  Quality conversations: Research and development in higher education , 2002 .

[11]  D. Jonassen Evaluating constructivistic learning , 1991 .

[12]  Michael F. Young,et al.  Instructional design for situated learning , 1993 .

[13]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Computers as theatre , 1991 .

[14]  J. Petraglia Reality by Design: The Rhetoric and Technology of Authenticity in Education , 1998 .

[15]  Linda Marshall,et al.  Design Influences in the Creation of an Online Mathematics Unit for Indigenous Adults , 2001 .

[16]  S. Barab,et al.  Designing Effective Interdisciplinary Anchors. , 1997 .

[17]  Ronald J. Kantor,et al.  Fostering the Suspension of Disbelief: The Role of Authenticity in Goal-Based Scenarios , 2000, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[18]  Barry Harper,et al.  Designing real life cases to support authentic design activities , 2002 .

[19]  Mary Rice,et al.  V-Lab: A virtual laboratory for teaching introductory concepts and methods of physical fitness and function , 1999 .

[20]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .