Errors in Training Computer Skills: on the Positive Function of Errors

Traditionally, errors are avoided in training. In contrast to this approach, it is argued that errors can also have a positive function and that one has to learn to deal efficiently with errors on a strategic and an emotional level (error management). An experiment tested these assumptions. One group (n = 9) received guidance for error-free performance; another group (n = 15) received error training. In the latter group, errors were produced by assigning problems that were too difficult to deal with. The error-training group showed higher scores in the nonspeed performance tests. Error training seems to be positive for people with high scores on the cognitive failure questionnaire (Broadbent, Cooper, FitzGerald, & Parkes, 1982).

[1]  BrownJohn Seely,et al.  Issues in cognitive and social ergonomics , 1985 .

[2]  H. Heckhausen,et al.  Motivation und Handeln , 1989 .

[3]  Jochen Prümper,et al.  The effects of an active development of the mental model in the training process: experimental results in a word processing system , 1988 .

[4]  D. Broadbent,et al.  The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. , 1982, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[5]  Heidi Keller,et al.  Innovation and the design of work and learning environments: The concept of exploration in human-computer interaction. , 1990 .

[6]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  The evaluation of text editors: methodology and empirical results. , 1983, CACM.

[7]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[8]  M. Frese,et al.  Error handling in office work with computers: A field study , 1993 .

[9]  Jochen Prümper,et al.  Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work , 1992 .

[10]  Siegfried Greif,et al.  Aktives Lernen durch systematische Fehlerexploration oder programmiertes Lernen durch Tutorials , 1987 .

[11]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Prompting, Feedback and Error Correction in the Design of a Scenario Machine , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[12]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Learning to use a word processor: by doing, by thinking, and by knowing , 1984 .

[13]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Training wheels in a user interface , 1984, CACM.

[14]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  A Human Activity Approach to User Interfaces , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[16]  Eckhard Apenburg,et al.  Befindlichkeitsbeschreibung als Methode der Beanspruchungsmessung: Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung und Validierung einer modifizierten Fassung der Eigenzustandsskala von NITSCH , 1986 .

[17]  D. Norman.  Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[18]  M. Frese,et al.  Goal Directed Behavior: The Concept of Action in Psychology , 1985 .

[19]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[20]  Rigas Wendel,et al.  DEVELOPING EXPLORATORY STRATEGIES IN TRAINING: THE GENERAL APPROACH AND A SPECIFIC EXAMPLE FOR MANUAL USE , 1987 .

[21]  B. Skinner,et al.  Science and human behavior , 1953 .

[22]  Jochen Prümper,et al.  Errors in working with office computers: A first validation of a taxonomy for observed errors in a field setting , 1992, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[23]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Issues in Cognitive and Social Ergonomics: From Our House to Bauhaus , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[24]  Maria Ovsiankina,et al.  Untersuchungen zur Handlungs- und Affektpsychologie , 1928 .