An improvement of the response surface method based on reference points for structural reliability analysis

The Response Surface Method (RSM) is a powerful technique to evaluate the structural reliability. However, for a Limit State Function (LSF) with highly non-linear, the accuracy of the approximation of the failure probability does not depend very much upon the design point. It is necessary for RSMs to consider the design point and the non-linear trend of actual LSF around the design point, because both of them influence the failure probability. Thus, in order to improve the fitting precision of the Response Surface Function (RSF) to the actual LSF over a larger region containing the design point, the reference points of experimental points are constructed in this paper. Experimental points used to obtain parameters of a RSF are selected according to the information of reference points. Four examples are discussed in detail. The numerical results indicate that the accuracy and the efficiency of the proposed method are both desirable for both numerical and implicit LSFs, and the proposed method is superior to the classical RSM in terms of efficiency and accuracy.

[1]  M. Deaton,et al.  Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses , 1989 .

[2]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis , 1993 .

[3]  Rui Zou,et al.  Neural Network Embedded Monte Carlo Approach for Water Quality Modeling under Input Information Uncertainty , 2002 .

[4]  Antonio Borri,et al.  Structural reliability analysis using a standard deterministic finite element code , 1997 .

[5]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Second-Order Reliability Approximations , 1987 .

[6]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[7]  N. Gayton,et al.  CQ2RS: a new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliability analysis , 2003 .

[8]  Michel Salaün,et al.  A new adaptive response surface method for reliability analysis , 2013 .

[9]  Christian Onof,et al.  An adaptive response surface method for reliability analysis of structures with multiple loading sequences , 2005 .

[10]  Mohsen Ali Shayanfar,et al.  A new adaptive importance sampling Monte Carlo method for structural reliability , 2013 .

[11]  Henri P. Gavin,et al.  High-order limit state functions in the response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2008 .

[12]  R. H. Myers,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[13]  Vincenzo Ilario Carbone,et al.  An improvement of the response surface method , 2011 .

[14]  Charles Elegbede,et al.  Structural reliability assessment based on particles swarm optimization , 2005 .

[15]  A. Sellier,et al.  Adaptive response surface method based on a double weighted regression technique , 2009 .

[16]  Alain Sellier,et al.  Probabilistic approach to corrosion risk due to carbonation via an adaptive response surface method , 2006 .

[17]  Sang Hyo Kim,et al.  Response surface method using vector projected sampling points , 1997 .

[18]  Zhiping Qiu,et al.  An efficient response surface method and its application to structural reliability and reliability-basedoptimization , 2013 .

[19]  B. Sudret,et al.  An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis , 2010 .

[20]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[21]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format , 1974 .

[22]  I. Kaymaz,et al.  A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis , 2005 .

[23]  Henrik O. Madsen,et al.  Structural Reliability Methods , 1996 .