AOF LTAO mode: reconstruction strategy and first test results

GALACSI is the Adaptive Optics (AO) system serving the instrument MUSE in the framework of the Adaptive Optics Facility (AOF) project. Its Narrow Field Mode (NFM) is a Laser Tomography AO (LTAO) mode delivering high resolution in the visible across a small Field of View (FoV) of 7.5" diameter around the optical axis. From a reconstruction standpoint, GALACSI NFM intends to optimize the correction on axis by estimating the turbulence in volume via a tomographic process, then projecting the turbulence profile onto one single Deformable Mirror (DM) located in the pupil, close to the ground. In this paper, the laser tomographic reconstruction process is described. Several methods (virtual DM, virtual layer projection) are studied, under the constraint of a single matrix vector multiplication. The pseudo-synthetic interaction matrix model and the LTAO reconstructor design are analysed. Moreover, the reconstruction parameter space is explored, in particular the regularization terms. Furthermore, we present here the strategy to define the modal control basis and split the reconstruction between the Low Order (LO) loop and the High Order (HO) loop. Finally, closed loop performance obtained with a 3D turbulence generator will be analysed with respect to the most relevant system parameters to be tuned.

[1]  M. Le Louarn,et al.  Calibration strategy of the AOF , 2012, Other Conferences.

[2]  R. Biasi,et al.  VLT deformable secondary mirror: integration and electromechanical tests results , 2012, Other Conferences.

[3]  Robin Arsenault,et al.  Alignment and integration of ASSIST: a test bench for VLT adaptive optics facility , 2010, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[4]  Robin Arsenault,et al.  Comparison between simulations and lab results on the ASSIST test-bench , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[5]  J. Kolb,et al.  What can be retrieved from adaptive optics real-time data? , 2012, Other Conferences.

[6]  Éric Thiébaut,et al.  Optimization of adaptive optics correction during observations: algorithms and system parameters identification in closed-loop , 2012, Other Conferences.

[7]  S. Oberti,et al.  Adaptive Optics Facility: control strategy and first on-sky results of the acquisition sequence , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[8]  Robin Arsenault,et al.  GRAAL on the mountaintop , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[9]  B. Ellerbroek,et al.  Split atmospheric tomography using laser and natural guide stars. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  Sarah J. Diggs,et al.  Gemini multiconjugate adaptive optics system review – II. Commissioning, operation and overall performance , 2014, 1402.6906.

[11]  J.-L. Lizon,et al.  AOF: standalone test results of GALACSI , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[12]  D. Looze,et al.  Fast calibration of high-order adaptive optics systems. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  Robin Arsenault,et al.  Laboratory results of the AOF system testing , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[14]  S. Stroebele,et al.  Large DM AO systems: synthetic IM or calibration on sky? , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[15]  Sylvain Oberti,et al.  High SNR measurement of interaction matrix on-sky and in lab , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.