Plant-wide systems microbiology for the wastewater industry

The wastewater treatment sector embraces mixed-culture biotechnologies for sanitation, environmental protection, and resource recovery. Bioprocess design, monitoring and control thrive on microbial processes selected in complex microbial communities. Microbial ecology and systems microbiology help access microbiomes and characterize microorganisms, metabolisms and interactions at increased resolution and throughput. Big datasets are generated from the sequencing of informational molecules extracted from biomasses sampled across process schemes. However, they mostly remain on science benches and computing clusters, without reaching the industry in a clear engineering objective function. A bilateral bridge should actionize this information. As systems microbiologists, we miss that engineering designs and operations rely on stoichiometry and kinetics. The added-value provided by microbial ecology and systems microbiology to improve capital (CAPEX) and operating expenditures (OPEX) needs to be addressed. As engineers, we miss that microbiology can be more powerful than physical-chemical measurements for quantitative process design (e.g., nutrient removal systems) with detailed scientific description of phenomena inside microbiomes. In this perspective article, we allied academia and industry to address the state of shared knowledge, successes and failures, and to establish joint investigation platforms. Our roadmap involves three milestones to (i) elaborate an essential list of microbiological information needed to implement methods at process line; (ii) characterize microbiomes from microorganisms to metabolisms, and shape conceptual ecosystem models as primer for process ecology understanding; (iii) bridge engineering and mathematical models with an analytical toolbox for fast- vs. high-throughput analyses to discover new microbial processes and engineer assemblies. We praise for a harmonized “language of love” (incorporating common vocabulary, units, protocols) across the water and environmental biotechnology sector to team up mindsets for a sewer- and plant-wide integration of systems microbiology and engineering.

[1]  Daniel B. Oerther,et al.  A vista for microbial ecology and environmental biotechnology. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  James S. Griffin,et al.  Complete Nutrient Removal Coupled to Nitrous Oxide Production as a Bioenergy Source by Denitrifying Polyphosphate-Accumulating Organisms. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  E. N. Banadda,et al.  Predicting the onset of filamentous bulking in biological wastewater treatment systems by exploiting image analysis information , 2003, 2003 European Control Conference (ECC).

[4]  Glen T. Daigger Flexibility and adaptability: essential elements of the WRRF of the future , 2017 .

[5]  W. Verstraete The technological side of the microbiome , 2015, npj Biofilms and Microbiomes.

[6]  Bas Diepenbroek,et al.  Multivariate PAT solutions for biopharmaceutical cultivation: current progress and limitations. , 2014, Trends in biotechnology.

[7]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Effects of oxygen concentration on N-removal in an aerobic granular sludge reactor. , 2005, Water research.

[8]  M. Shemesh,et al.  Preventing Biofilm Formation by Dairy-Associated Bacteria Using Peptide-Coated Surfaces , 2019, Front. Microbiol..

[9]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Incorporating microbial ecology into the metabolic modelling of polyphosphate accumulating organisms and glycogen accumulating organisms. , 2010, Water research.

[10]  B. Smets,et al.  Nitrous oxide emissions from biofilm processes for wastewater treatment , 2018, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[11]  H. Carrère,et al.  Pretreatment methods to improve sludge anaerobic degradability: a review. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[12]  Damir Brdjanovic,et al.  Anticipating the next century of wastewater treatment , 2014, Science.

[13]  Amy Pruden,et al.  Impact of Water Chemistry, Pipe Material and Stagnation on the Building Plumbing Microbiome , 2015, PloS one.

[14]  P. Hugenholtz,et al.  Genome sequences of rare, uncultured bacteria obtained by differential coverage binning of multiple metagenomes , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  Sunny C. Jiang,et al.  Reusing Treated Wastewater: Consideration of the Safety Aspects Associated with Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and Antibiotic Resistance Genes , 2018 .

[16]  P. A. Marrone,et al.  Bench‐Scale Evaluation of Hydrothermal Processing Technology for Conversion of Wastewater Solids to Fuels , 2018, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[17]  H. Siegrist,et al.  The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1). , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[18]  E. Topp,et al.  Management Options for Reducing the Release of Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance Genes to the Environment , 2013, Environmental health perspectives.

[19]  B. Smets,et al.  Temperature modulates stress response in mainstream anammox reactors , 2021, Communications Biology.

[20]  Jules B. van Lier,et al.  A review of anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment: Integration options, limitations and expectations , 2013 .

[21]  Nikiforos A Alygizakis,et al.  The impact of on-site hospital wastewater treatment on the downstream communal wastewater system in terms of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes. , 2019, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[22]  Frederik Hammes,et al.  Inactivation of Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria and Resistance Genes by Ozone: From Laboratory Experiments to Full-Scale Wastewater Treatment. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  C. Eskicioglu,et al.  Effect of biochar and wood ash amendment on biochemical methane production of wastewater sludge from a temperature phase anaerobic digestion process. , 2019, Bioresource technology.

[24]  J. Heijnen,et al.  Aerobic granulation in a sequencing batch reactor , 1999 .

[25]  F. Baquero,et al.  Tackling antibiotic resistance: the environmental framework , 2015, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[26]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Annual dynamics of antimicrobials and resistance determinants in flocculent and aerobic granular sludge treatment systems. , 2020, Water research.

[27]  C. Holliger,et al.  Identification of trigger factors selecting for polyphosphate- and glycogen-accumulating organisms in aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactors. , 2013, Water research.

[28]  Ian C. Watson,et al.  Water reclamation fuels economic growth in Harlingen, Texas. Reclamation of municipal wastewater for industrial process use , 1995 .

[29]  M. Winkler,et al.  An integrative review of granular sludge for the biological removal of nutrients and recalcitrant organic matter from wastewater , 2018 .

[30]  Heinz Singer,et al.  Hospital wastewater treatment by membrane bioreactor: performance and efficiency for organic micropollutant elimination. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  M. B. Beck,et al.  A New Planning and Design Paradigm to Achieve Sustainable Resource Recovery from Wastewater. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  H. Spanjers,et al.  Separation of natural organic matter and sodium chloride for salt recovery purposes in zero liquid discharge , 2020, Water Resources and Industry.

[33]  D. Eikelboom Filamentous organisms observed in activated sludge , 1975 .

[34]  S. Vlaeminck,et al.  Enrichment and Aggregation of Purple Non-sulfur Bacteria in a Mixed-Culture Sequencing-Batch Photobioreactor for Biological Nutrient Removal From Wastewater , 2020, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.

[35]  Yang Liu,et al.  Evaluation of influent microbial immigration to activated sludge is affected by different-sized community segregation , 2021, npj Clean Water.

[36]  D. Frigon,et al.  Should activated sludge models consider influent seeding of nitrifiers? Field characterization of nitrifying bacteria. , 2014, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[37]  D. Frigon,et al.  Wastewater microbial community structure and functional traits change over short timescales. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[38]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Bioprocessing in the Digital Age: The Role of Process Models , 2019, Biotechnology journal.

[39]  A Tilche,et al.  New perspectives in anaerobic digestion. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[40]  W. Verstraete,et al.  ZeroWasteWater: short-cycling of wastewater resources for sustainable cities of the future , 2011 .

[41]  T. Neu,et al.  Assessment of bacterial and structural dynamics in aerobic granular biofilms , 2013, Front. Microbiol..

[42]  Peter A. Wilderer,et al.  Aerobic granular sludge in a sequencing batch reactor , 1997 .

[43]  M. Winkler,et al.  Comparison of microbial populations and foaming dynamics in conventional versus membrane enhanced biological phosphorous removal systems , 2016 .

[44]  Christopher E. Lawson,et al.  Autotrophic and mixotrophic metabolism of an anammox bacterium revealed by in vivo 13C and 2H metabolic network mapping , 2020, The ISME journal.

[45]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Bacterial community dynamics and disinfection impact in cooling water systems. , 2020, Water research.

[46]  David G. Weissbrodt,et al.  The feasibility of automated online flow cytometry for in-situ monitoring of microbial dynamics in aquatic ecosystems , 2014, Front. Microbiol..

[47]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Identification of syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacteria in anaerobic digesters by combined protein-based stable isotope probing and metagenomics , 2016, The ISME Journal.

[48]  H. Bürgmann,et al.  Increased Levels of Multiresistant Bacteria and Resistance Genes after Wastewater Treatment and Their Dissemination into Lake Geneva, Switzerland , 2012, Front. Microbio..

[49]  Aviaja Anna Hansen,et al.  MiDAS: the field guide to the microbes of activated sludge , 2015, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[50]  G. Medema,et al.  Low voltage iron electrocoagulation as a tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater: removal of enteric pathogen indicators and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. , 2020, Water research.

[51]  David G. Weissbrodt,et al.  Biological control of biofilms on membranes by metazoans. , 2016, Water research.

[52]  Thomas Dobbeleers,et al.  Evaluation of two start‐up strategies to obtain nitrogen removal via nitrite and examination of the nitrous oxide emissions for different nitritation levels during the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater , 2018 .

[53]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[54]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  An ASM/ADM model interface for dynamic plant-wide simulation. , 2009, Water research.

[55]  R. Colwell,et al.  Characterization of the Microbiome at the World’s Largest Potable Water Reuse Facility , 2018, Front. Microbiol..

[56]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Characterisation of microbial communities for improved management of anaerobic digestion of food waste. , 2020, Waste management.

[57]  S. Vlaeminck,et al.  Operational Strategies to Selectively Produce Purple Bacteria for Microbial Protein in Raceway Reactors. , 2021, Environmental science & technology.

[58]  P. Nielsen,et al.  Connecting structure to function with the recovery of over 1000 high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes from activated sludge using long-read sequencing , 2021, Nature Communications.

[59]  W. Verstraete Microbial ecology and environmental biotechnology , 2007, The ISME Journal.

[60]  Najiaowa Yu,et al.  Effects of micro-aeration on microbial niches and antimicrobial resistances in blackwater anaerobic digesters. , 2021, Water research.

[61]  P. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Optimizing the configuration of integrated nutrient and energy recovery treatment trains: A new application of global sensitivity analysis to the generic nutrient recovery model (NRM) library. , 2018, Bioresource technology.

[62]  C. Holliger,et al.  Nitrogen Removal over Nitrite by Aeration Control in Aerobic Granular Sludge Sequencing Batch Reactors , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[63]  J. Frijns,et al.  Responsible Water Reuse Needs an Interdisciplinary Approach to Balance Risks and Benefits , 2020, Water.

[64]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  Used water and nutrients: Recovery perspectives in a 'panta rhei' context. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[65]  J. Mahillon,et al.  Filamentous bulking caused by Thiothrix species is efficiently controlled in full-scale wastewater treatment plants by implementing a sludge densification strategy , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[66]  Marta Nierychlo,et al.  A Critical Assessment of the Microorganisms Proposed to be Important to Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal in Full-Scale Wastewater Treatment Systems , 2017, Front. Microbiol..

[67]  N. Derlon,et al.  Physical structure determines compression of membrane biofilms during Gravity Driven Membrane (GDM) ultrafiltration. , 2018, Water research.

[68]  Wen-Tso Liu,et al.  The application of molecular tools to study the drinking water microbiome – Current understanding and future needs , 2019, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology.

[69]  K. S. Creamer,et al.  Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[70]  C. Holliger,et al.  Optimized aeration strategies for nitrogen and phosphorus removal with aerobic granular sludge. , 2013, Water research.

[71]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Determinants of presence and removal of antibiotic resistance genes during WWTP treatment: A cross-sectional study. , 2019, Water research.

[72]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Upgrading residues from wastewater and drinking water treatment plants as low-cost adsorbents to remove extracellular DNA and microorganisms carrying antibiotic resistance genes from treated effluents. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[73]  Peter J. Vikesland,et al.  Toward a Comprehensive Strategy to Mitigate Dissemination of Environmental Sources of Antibiotic Resistance. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[74]  M. Labra,et al.  Changes in the Drinking Water Microbiome: Effects of Water Treatments Along the Flow of Two Drinking Water Treatment Plants in a Urbanized Area, Milan (Italy) , 2018, Front. Microbiol..

[75]  Mike Sweeney,et al.  Modeling, Instrumentation, Automation, and Optimization of Water Resource Recovery Facilities (2020) DIRECT. , 2020, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[76]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  A new plant-wide modelling methodology for WWTPs. , 2007, Water research.

[77]  M C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  Full scale performance of the aerobic granular sludge process for sewage treatment. , 2015, Water research.

[78]  Lluís Corominas,et al.  The application of life cycle assessment (LCA) to wastewater treatment: A best practice guide and critical review. , 2020, Water research.

[79]  M C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  Selective sludge removal in a segregated aerobic granular biomass system as a strategy to control PAO-GAO competition at high temperatures. , 2011, Water research.

[80]  G. Medema,et al.  Quantification of waterborne pathogens and associated health risks in urban water. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[81]  Cristian Picioreanu,et al.  Multi-scale individual-based model of microbial and bioconversion dynamics in aerobic granular sludge. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[82]  J. Mahillon,et al.  Improving phosphorus removal in aerobic granular sludge processes through selective microbial management. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[83]  R. Colwell,et al.  Drinking Water Microbiome Project: Is it Time? , 2019, Trends in microbiology.

[84]  Marco Antônio Siqueira Rodrigues,et al.  Wastewater reuse in a cascade based system of a petrochemical industry for the replacement of losses in cooling towers. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[85]  Paul Wilmes,et al.  Integrated omics for the identification of key functionalities in biological wastewater treatment microbial communities , 2015, Microbial biotechnology.

[86]  Cosmin Copot,et al.  Performance and stability of a dynamically controlled EBPR anaerobic/aerobic granular sludge reactor. , 2019, Bioresource technology.

[87]  F. Hammes,et al.  Drinking water microbiology--from measurement to management. , 2015, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[88]  L. T. Angenent,et al.  Production of bioenergy and biochemicals from industrial and agricultural wastewater. , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[89]  Aaron Marc Saunders,et al.  Microbial communities involved in enhanced biological phosphorus removal from wastewater--a model system in environmental biotechnology. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[90]  J. Barr,et al.  Granule Formation Mechanisms within an Aerobic Wastewater System for Phosphorus Removal , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[91]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Free-floating extracellular DNA: Systematic profiling of mobile genetic elements and antibiotic resistance from wastewater. , 2020, Water research.

[92]  Peter A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Continuity-based model interfacing for plant-wide simulation: a general approach. , 2006, Water research.

[93]  Ophelia S. Venturelli,et al.  Common principles and best practices for engineering microbiomes , 2019, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[94]  Daniel B. Oerther,et al.  Who eats what? Classifying microbial populations based on diurnal profiles of rRNA levels. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[95]  C. Holliger,et al.  Optimization of operation conditions for the startup of aerobic granular sludge reactors biologically removing carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorous. , 2014, Water research.

[96]  Amy Pruden,et al.  Reclaimed water as a reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes: distribution system and irrigation implications , 2013, Front. Microbiol..

[97]  Dominique Bonvin,et al.  Incremental Parameter Estimation under Rank-Deficient Measurement Conditions , 2019, Processes.

[98]  Bernhard O. Palsson,et al.  A road map for the development of community systems (CoSy) biology , 2012, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[99]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Effect of phosphate availability on biofilm formation in cooling towers , 2020, Biofouling.

[100]  Lluís Corominas,et al.  Transforming data into knowledge for improved wastewater treatment operation: A critical review of techniques , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[101]  G. Wells,et al.  Comammox Nitrospira are the dominant ammonia oxidizers in a mainstream low dissolved oxygen nitrification reactor. , 2019, Water research.

[102]  A. Stintzi,et al.  Low temperature MBBR nitrification: Microbiome analysis. , 2017, Water research.

[103]  HanreichAngelika,et al.  Metaproteome analysis to determine the metabolically active part of a thermophilic microbial community producing biogas from agricultural biomass , 2012 .

[104]  H. Spanjers,et al.  Comparative performance of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor and anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating phenolic wastewater: Overcoming high salinity , 2019, Chemical Engineering Journal.

[105]  H. Aizawa,et al.  Microbiomes and chemical components of feed water and membrane-attached biofilm in reverse osmosis system to treat membrane bioreactor effluents , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[106]  Jeppe Lund Nielsen,et al.  Microbial population dynamics in continuous anaerobic digester systems during start up, stable conditions and recovery after starvation. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[107]  S. Ebrahimi,et al.  Bacterial Selection during the Formation of Early-Stage Aerobic Granules in Wastewater Treatment Systems Operated Under Wash-Out Dynamics , 2012, Front. Microbio..

[108]  Harris H. Wang,et al.  Metagenomic engineering of the mammalian gut microbiome in situ , 2018, Nature Methods.

[109]  C. Holliger,et al.  Modeling hydraulic transport and anaerobic uptake by PAOs and GAOs during wastewater feeding in EBPR granular sludge reactors , 2017, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[110]  Irina Dana Ofiteru,et al.  Combined niche and neutral effects in a microbial wastewater treatment community , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[111]  H. Hauduc,et al.  Critical review of activated sludge modeling: State of process knowledge, modeling concepts, and limitations , 2013, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[112]  Bing Li,et al.  Metagenomics shows that low-energy anaerobic-aerobic treatment reactors reduce antibiotic resistance gene levels from domestic wastewater. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[113]  D. Frigon,et al.  Microbial immigration in wastewater treatment systems: analytical considerations and process implications. , 2019, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[114]  George F Wells,et al.  Fine-scale bacterial community dynamics and the taxa-time relationship within a full-scale activated sludge bioreactor. , 2011, Water research.

[115]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Modelling and real-time control of the integrated urban wastewater system , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[116]  Donovan H. Parks,et al.  Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life , 2017, Nature Microbiology.

[117]  A. Pollice,et al.  Functional Response of MBR Microbial Consortia to Substrate Stress as Revealed by Metaproteomics , 2019, Microbial Ecology.

[118]  G. Wells,et al.  Regional synchrony in full-scale activated sludge bioreactors due to deterministic microbial community assembly , 2016, The ISME Journal.

[119]  A. Stams,et al.  Meta-omics approaches to understand and improve wastewater treatment systems , 2015, Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology.

[120]  S. Miller,et al.  The Water Microbiome Through a Pilot Scale Advanced Treatment Facility for Direct Potable Reuse , 2019, Front. Microbiol..

[121]  Lutgarde Raskin,et al.  Spatial-Temporal Survey and Occupancy-Abundance Modeling To Predict Bacterial Community Dynamics in the Drinking Water Microbiome , 2014, mBio.

[122]  J J Heijnen,et al.  Simultaneous COD, nitrogen, and phosphate removal by aerobic granular sludge. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[123]  C. M. Hooijmans,et al.  Modeling the PAO-GAO competition: effects of carbon source, pH and temperature. , 2009, Water research.

[124]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  N-removal in a granular sludge sequencing batch airlift reactor. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[125]  L. Raskin,et al.  Long-term analysis of a full-scale activated sludge wastewater treatment system exhibiting seasonal biological foaming. , 2006, Water research.

[126]  C. Holliger,et al.  Linking bacterial population dynamics and nutrient removal in the granular sludge biofilm ecosystem engineered for wastewater treatment. , 2014, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[127]  J. Heijnen,et al.  Dynamics of population and biofilm structure in the biofilm airlift suspension reactor for carbon and nitrogen removal , 1994 .

[128]  M. Loosdrecht,et al.  Cost of fouling in full-scale reverse osmosis and nanofiltration installations in the Netherlands , 2021, Desalination.

[129]  R. Castro‐Muñoz,et al.  Current Advances in Biofouling Mitigation in Membranes for Water Treatment: An Overview , 2020, Processes.

[130]  M C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  Aerobic granular sludge technology: an alternative to activated sludge? , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[131]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  "Candidatus Accumulibacter delftensis": A clade IC novel polyphosphate-accumulating organism without denitrifying activity on nitrate. , 2019, Water research.

[132]  Anurag S. Rathore,et al.  QbD/PAT for bioprocessing: moving from theory to implementation , 2014 .

[133]  R. Heyer,et al.  Metaproteomics of activated sludge from a wastewater treatment plant – A pilot study , 2015, Proteomics.

[134]  Yong Li,et al.  Global diversity and biogeography of bacterial communities in wastewater treatment plants , 2019, Nature Microbiology.

[135]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Bulking sludge in biological nutrient removal systems , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[136]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Long-Term Bacterial Dynamics in a Full-Scale Drinking Water Distribution System , 2016, PloS one.

[137]  J. Trygg,et al.  A machine learning framework to improve effluent quality control in wastewater treatment plants. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[138]  T. Møretrø,et al.  Residential Bacteria on Surfaces in the Food Industry and Their Implications for Food Safety and Quality. , 2017, Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety.

[139]  A. Bardow,et al.  A Guideline for Life Cycle Assessment of Carbon Capture and Utilization , 2020, Frontiers in Energy Research.

[140]  M. Reis,et al.  Assessing the abundance and activity of denitrifying polyphosphate accumulating organisms through molecular and chemical techniques. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[141]  M. Nierychlo,et al.  MiDAS 3: An ecosystem-specific reference database, taxonomy and knowledge platform for activated sludge and anaerobic digesters reveals species-level microbiome composition of activated sludge. , 2020, Water research.

[142]  R. Blust,et al.  Formation of aerobic granular sludge during the treatment of petrochemical wastewater. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[143]  Jana Seifert,et al.  Enhancing metaproteomics—The value of models and defined environmental microbial systems , 2016, Proteomics.

[144]  Gerald Striedner,et al.  Quality by control: Towards model predictive control of mammalian cell culture bioprocesses. , 2017, Biotechnology journal.