Robotically controlled microprey to resolve initial attack modes preceding phagocytosis

The behavior of phagocytes to capture intruders is tracked using remotely rotated and translated nanoparticles. Phagocytes, predatory cells of the immune system, continuously probe their cellular microenvironment on the hunt for invaders. This requires prey recognition followed by the formation of physical contacts sufficiently stable for pickup. Although immune cells must apply physical forces to pick up their microbial prey, little is known about their hunting behavior preceding phagocytosis because of a lack of appropriate technologies. To study phagocyte hunting behavior in which the adhesive bonds by which the prey holds on to surfaces must be broken, we exploited the use of microrobotic probes to mimic bacteria. We simulate different hunting scenarios by confronting single macrophages with prey-mimicking micromagnets using a 5–degree of freedom magnetic tweezers system (5D-MTS). The energy landscape that guided the translational and rotational movement of these microparticles was dynamically adjusted to explore how translational and rotational resistive forces regulate the modes of macrophage attacks. For translational resistive prey, distinct push-pull attacks were observed. For rod-shaped, nonresistive prey, which mimic free-floating pathogens, cells co-aligned their prey with their long axis to facilitate pickup. Increasing the rotational trap stiffness to mimic resistive or surface-bound prey disrupts this realignment process. At stiffness levels on the order of 105 piconewton nanometer radian−1, macrophages failed to realign their prey, inhibiting uptake. Our 5D-MTS was used as a proof-of-concept study to probe the translational and rotational attack modes of phagocytes with high spatial and temporal resolution, although the system can also be used for a variety of other mechanobiology studies at length scales ranging from single cells to organ-on-a-chip devices.

[1]  Sergio Grinstein,et al.  Quantitative analysis of membrane remodeling at the phagocytic cup. , 2007, Molecular biology of the cell.

[2]  Mary E Napier,et al.  More effective nanomedicines through particle design. , 2011, Small.

[3]  Jacob W J Kerssemakers,et al.  Magnetic torque tweezers: measuring torsional stiffness in DNA and RecA-DNA filaments , 2010, Nature Methods.

[4]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Causes Strengthening of Integrin–Cytoskeleton Linkages , 1997, Cell.

[5]  Patricia Bassereau,et al.  Filopodial retraction force is generated by cortical actin dynamics and controlled by reversible tethering at the tip , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Ernst H. K. Stelzer,et al.  Filopodia act as phagocytic tentacles and pull with discrete steps and a load-dependent velocity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  L. Oddershede,et al.  An updated look at actin dynamics in filopodia , 2015, Cytoskeleton.

[8]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Role of target geometry in phagocytosis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Raibatak Das,et al.  Actin cytoskeleton reorganization by Syk regulates Fcγ receptor responsiveness by increasing its lateral mobility and clustering. , 2014, Developmental cell.

[10]  Bradley J. Nelson,et al.  Real-time rigid-body visual tracking in a scanning electron microscope , 2007 .

[11]  J. Costerton,et al.  Biofilms as complex differentiated communities. , 2002, Annual review of microbiology.

[12]  Michelle D. Wang,et al.  Optical torque wrench: angular trapping, rotation, and torque detection of quartz microparticles. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[13]  Steven M. Block,et al.  Compliance of bacterial flagella measured with optical tweezers , 1989, Nature.

[14]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Physical approaches to biomaterial design. , 2009, Nature materials.

[15]  Jake J. Abbott,et al.  OctoMag: An Electromagnetic System for 5-DOF Wireless Micromanipulation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[16]  Bradley J. Nelson,et al.  Three-dimensional, automated magnetic biomanipulation with subcellular resolution , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[18]  Zijie Yan,et al.  Why single-beam optical tweezers trap gold nanowires in three dimensions. , 2013, ACS nano.

[19]  W. Murdoch,et al.  Predation and Population Stability , 1975 .

[20]  Jing Li,et al.  Manipulation and assembly of ZnO nanowires with single holographic optical tweezers system. , 2014, Applied optics.

[21]  Valentin Jaumouillé,et al.  The cell biology of phagocytosis. , 2012, Annual review of pathology.

[22]  S. Erni,et al.  Three-Dimensional Magnetic Manipulation of Micro- and Nanostructures for Applications in Life Sciences , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[23]  Marcos,et al.  The wiggling trajectories of bacteria , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Sonam Bhatia,et al.  Filamentous morphology of bacteria delays the timing of phagosome morphogenesis in macrophages , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  Nynke H. Dekker,et al.  Magnetic Tweezers for the Measurement of Twist and Torque , 2014, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[27]  Scott Forth,et al.  Nanofabricated quartz cylinders for angular trapping: DNA supercoiling torque detection , 2007, Nature Methods.

[28]  Norbert F. Scherer,et al.  Three-dimensional optical trapping and manipulation of single silver nanowires. , 2012, Nano letters.

[29]  G. Fonnum,et al.  Characterisation of Dynabeads® by magnetization measurements and Mössbauer spectroscopy , 2005 .

[30]  Khuloud Jaqaman,et al.  Dynamic macrophage “probing” is required for the efficient capture of phagocytic targets , 2010 .

[31]  Joel A. Swanson,et al.  Shaping cups into phagosomes and macropinosomes , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[32]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Designer Biomaterials for Nanomedicine , 2009 .

[33]  Christophe Vieu,et al.  Protrusion force microscopy reveals oscillatory force generation and mechanosensing activity of human macrophage podosomes , 2014, Nature Communications.

[34]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Shape Induced Inhibition of Phagocytosis of Polymer Particles , 2008, Pharmaceutical Research.

[35]  Maria Dimaki,et al.  Manipulation of biological samples using micro and nano techniques. , 2009, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[36]  S. Abraham,et al.  Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored receptor-mediated bacterial endocytosis. , 2001, FEMS microbiology letters.

[37]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Macrophages lift off surface-bound bacteria using a filopodium-lamellipodium hook-and-shovel mechanism , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[38]  K. Neuman,et al.  Single-molecule force spectroscopy: optical tweezers, magnetic tweezers and atomic force microscopy , 2008, Nature Methods.

[39]  Stephane Barland,et al.  Excitable Particles in an Optical Torque Wrench , 2011 .

[40]  Keir C. Neuman,et al.  SnapShot: Force Spectroscopy and Single-Molecule Manipulation , 2013, Cell.

[41]  Viola Vogel,et al.  The race to the pole: how high-aspect ratio shape and heterogeneous environments limit phagocytosis of filamentous Escherichia coli bacteria by macrophages. , 2012, Nano letters.

[42]  Viola Vogel,et al.  The Yin-Yang of Rigidity Sensing: How Forces and Mechanical Properties Regulate the Cellular Response to Materials , 2013 .

[43]  Marc Herant,et al.  Protrusive Push versus Enveloping Embrace: Computational Model of Phagocytosis Predicts Key Regulatory Role of Cytoskeletal Membrane Anchors , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  Thomas Bornschlögl,et al.  How filopodia pull: What we know about the mechanics and dynamics of filopodia , 2013, Cytoskeleton.