Discourse functions of the Evaluative Enhanced Theme Construction

By drawing on Halliday’s relevant theories, this paper investigates the discourse functions of what is called, in the present terminology, the Evaluative Enhanced Theme Construction in English or the EETC, (which is termed the extraposition construction in traditional grammar). We prefer the present terminology because this construction is typically employed to express evaluation, and the evaluative meaning is syntactically enhanced. After a structural analysis of the EETC in semantic terms, we put forward our interpretation of the structure of text, whose parts are semantically (rather than structurally) related to each other. Hence to investigate the discourse function of a construction is to see how it is semantically related to its co-text. Observation of occurrence of EETC in actual texts shows that EETC typically relates to its co-text through the logico-semantic relation of evaluation-basis. When it occurs paragraph-initially or finally, it tends to co-occur with hyper-Theme or hyper-New, and it chunks prospectively or retrospectively respectively through this logico-semantic relation, with the chunking force extending over the whole paragraph. When it occurs in between the hyper-Theme and the hyper-New, its discourse functions tend to be more localized. Our data also reveal that different types of EETC with respect to the evaluated entities function differently in the organization of text; such difference is attributable to the different ontological status of the evaluated entities.

[1]  M. Hoey On the surface of discourse , 1983 .

[2]  María de los Ángeles Gómez González The Theme-Topic interface: evidence from English , 2001 .

[3]  Adriana Bolívar The negotiation of evaluation in written text , 2001 .

[4]  J. Lemke Resources for attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics , 1998 .

[5]  Jennifer Herriman Extraposition from a Systemic Functional perspective , 2001 .

[6]  D. Biber,et al.  Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect , 1989 .

[7]  M. E. J. Richardson,et al.  A Comprehensive Grammar to Hammurabi's Stele , 2008 .

[8]  Susan Hunston,et al.  Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse , 2002 .

[9]  Diana Kilpert Working with discourse: meaning beyond the clause: J.R. Martin and David Rose, London & New York: Continuum, 2003, pp. xii + 293. ISBN 0-8264-5507-7 (hardback, price £65.00), 0-8264-5508-5 (paperback, price £25.00) , 2004 .

[10]  Robert N. St. Clair,et al.  Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. William Labov. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972. 412 p. + xxiv. $6.95 paper , 1974 .

[11]  Extraposition in English: A Study of the Interaction between the Matrix Predicate and the Type of Extraposed Clause , 2000 .

[12]  M. Halliday,et al.  Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective , 1989 .

[13]  M. P. Jordan Some discourse patterns and signalling of theassessment-basis relation , 2001 .