Image acquisition geometry analysis for the fusion of optical and radar remote sensing data

Fusion of optical and radar remote sensing data is becoming an actual topic of discussion recently in various application areas though the results are not always satisfactory. In this article, we analyse some disturbing aspects of fusing orthoimages from sensors having different acquisition geometries. These aspects arise due to errors in digital elevation models (DEM), used for image orthorectification, and the existence of 3-D objects in the scene which are not accounted in the DEM. We analyse how these effects influence the ground displacement in orthoimages produced from optical and radar data. Further, we propose sensor formations with acquisition geometry parameters which allow to minimise or compensate for ground displacements in different orthoimages due to the above-mentioned effects and to produce good prerequisites for the following fusion for specific application areas, e.g. matching, filling data gaps, classification, etc. To demonstrate the potential of the proposed approach, two pairs of optical–radar data were acquired over the urban area–Munich City, Germany. The first collection of WorldView-1 and TerraSAR-X (TS-X) data followed the proposed recommendations for acquisition geometry parameters, whereas the second collection of IKONOS and TS-X data was acquired with accidental parameters. The experiment confirmed our ideas fully. Moreover, it opens new possibilities for optical and radar image fusion.

[1]  I Dowman,et al.  Precise orientation of SPOT panchromatic images with tie points to a SAR image , 2002 .

[2]  T. Toutin,et al.  Stereo-mapping with SPOT-P and ERS-1 SAR images , 2000 .

[3]  Christine Pohl,et al.  Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: concepts, methods and applications , 1998 .

[4]  Th Toutin,et al.  Multisource Data Fusion with an Integrated and Unified Geometric Modelling , 1995 .

[5]  Michael Eineder,et al.  The Pyramids of Gizeh Seen by TerraSAR-X—A Prime Example for Unexpected Scattering Mechanisms in SAR , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  Uwe Soergel,et al.  Feature Extraction and Visualization of Bridges Over Water From High-Resolution InSAR Data and One Orthophoto , 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Peter Reinartz,et al.  Mutual-Information-Based Registration of TerraSAR-X and Ikonos Imagery in Urban Areas , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Mihai Datcu,et al.  Information fusion approach for the data classification: an example for ERS‐1/2 InSAR data , 2008 .

[9]  A. Roth,et al.  TerraSAR-X SAR products and processing algorithms , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS '05..

[10]  Franklin E White,et al.  Data Fusion Lexicon , 1991 .

[11]  J. D. Wegner,et al.  ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF BUILDING HEIGHT ESTIMATION FROM A HIGH RESOLUTION OPTICAL IMAGE COMBINED WITH A SIMULATED SAR IMAGE , 2009 .

[12]  Lucien Wald,et al.  Some terms of reference in data fusion , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  S. Quegan,et al.  Understanding Synthetic Aperture Radar Images , 1998 .

[14]  S. Klonus COMPARISON OF PANSHARPENING ALGORITHMS FOR COMBINING RADAR AND MULTISPECTRAL DATA , 2008 .

[15]  Felix Naumann,et al.  Data fusion , 2009, CSUR.