Optimizing the Dose of Pre-Pandemic Influenza Vaccines to Reduce the Infection Attack Rate

Background The recent spread of avian influenza in wild birds and poultry may be a precursor to the emergence of a 1918-like human pandemic. Therefore, stockpiles of human pre-pandemic vaccine (targeted at avian strains) are being considered. For many countries, the principal constraint for these vaccine stockpiles will be the total mass of antigen maintained. We tested the hypothesis that lower individual doses (i.e., less than the recommended dose for maximum protection) may provide substantial extra community-level benefits because they would permit wider vaccine coverage for a given total size of antigen stockpile. Methods and Findings We used a mathematical model to predict infection attack rates under different policies. The model incorporated both an individual's response to vaccination at different doses and the process of person-to-person transmission of pandemic influenza. We found that substantial reductions in the attack rate are likely if vaccines are given to more people at lower doses. These results are applicable to all three vaccine candidates for which data are available. As a guide to the magnitude of the effect, we simulated epidemics based on historical studies of immunogenicity. For example, for one of the vaccines for which data are available, the attack rate would drop from 67.6% to 58.7% if 160 out of the total US population of 300 million were given an optimal dose rather than 20 out of 300 million given the maximally protective dose (as promulgated in the US National Pandemic Preparedness Plan). Our results are conservative with respect to a number of alternative assumptions about the precise nature of vaccine protection. We also considered a model variant that includes a single high-risk subgroup representing children. For smaller stockpile sizes that allow vaccine to be offered only to the high-risk group at the optimal dose, the predicted benefits of using the homogenous model formed a lower bound in the presence of a risk group, even when the high-risk group was twice as infective and twice as susceptible. Conclusions In addition to individual-level protection (i.e., vaccine efficacy), the population-level implications of pre-pandemic vaccine programs should be considered when deciding on stockpile size and dose. Our results suggest that a lower vaccine dose may be justified in order to increase population coverage, thereby reducing the infection attack rate overall.

[1]  T. Jefferson,et al.  Influenza vaccination for health-care workers who work with elderly people in institutions: a systematic review. , 2006, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[2]  A. Gibbs,et al.  Molecular virology: Was the 1918 pandemic caused by a bird flu? Was the 1918 flu avian in origin? (Reply) , 2006, Nature.

[3]  Lawrence O Gostin,et al.  Medical countermeasures for pandemic influenza: ethics and the law. , 2006, JAMA.

[4]  Public Health Strategies for Pandemic Influenza , 2006 .

[5]  Gavin J. D. Smith,et al.  Emergence and predominance of an H5N1 influenza variant in China , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Yu Wang,et al.  Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated adjuvanted whole-virion influenza A (H5N1) vaccine: a phase I randomised controlled trial , 2006, The Lancet.

[7]  C. Viboud,et al.  A Bayesian MCMC approach to study transmission of influenza: application to household longitudinal data , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  S. Blower,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the basic reproductive rate. Tuberculosis as an example. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  J. Piercy,et al.  Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of influenza vaccination. , 2004, Virus research.

[10]  Ezekiel J Emanuel,et al.  Who Should Get Influenza Vaccine When Not All Can? , 2006, Science.

[11]  L. Gostin,et al.  Public health strategies for pandemic influenza: ethics and the law. , 2006, JAMA.

[12]  Shweta Bansal,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Influenza Vaccination Programs , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[13]  Mark Wolff,et al.  Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated subvirion influenza A (H5N1) vaccine. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  T. A. Bektemirov,et al.  [Inactivated influenza vaccines]. , 1978, Voprosy virusologii.

[15]  The ethics of influenza vaccination. , 2006, Science.

[16]  M. Zambon,et al.  Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated split-virion influenza A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (H5N1) vaccine: phase I randomised trial , 2006, The Lancet.

[17]  A. S. Beare,et al.  The role of serum haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody in protection against challenge infection with influenza A2 and B viruses , 1972, Epidemiology and Infection.

[18]  M Elizabeth Halloran,et al.  Design and evaluation of prophylactic interventions using infectious disease incidence data from close contact groups , 2006, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics.

[19]  R. Bugarini,et al.  Cross-reactivity to highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses after vaccination with nonadjuvanted and MF59-adjuvanted influenza A/Duck/Singapore/97 (H5N3) vaccine: a potential priming strategy. , 2005, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[20]  T. Britton,et al.  Stochastic multitype epidemics in a community of households: estimation and form of optimal vaccination schemes. , 2004, Mathematical biosciences.

[21]  Jeffery K. Taubenberger,et al.  Characterization of the 1918 influenza virus polymerase genes , 2005, Nature.