Synthetic Evaluation of Natural Gas Pipeline Operation Schemes Based on the Multi-level Grey Cluster Decision Method

In this paper, a multi-level grey cluster decision method is proposed for the synthetic evaluation of operation schemes of natural gas pipelines with inexact data and insufficient information. A four-level index system is built as the synthetic evaluation criterion, aiming in balancing transmission volume, economic profit, and safety of the pipeline. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method is applied to calculate the weights of indexes. In order to assess the pipeline’s operation schemes with multi-level index, the principle of AHP method and the conventional grey cluster decision method are incorporated into a new multi-level grey evaluation method. The essential procedures of the method are illustrated in details, including computations of the grey class, whitenization weight function, decision coefficient matrix, weighted normalized decision coefficient matrix and synthetic evaluation score. Finally, this method is applied to seven operation schemes of Se–Ning–Lan gas pipeline in China. The results demonstrate that synthetic prior order of each scheme is not dependent on any one evaluation index, but on the comprehensive performance of the transmission volume, economic profit and pipeline safety. The application proves that the pipeline’s operation schemes can be reasonably evaluated even if insufficient data are used. The achievement of this paper provides a new analytical method as well as a powerful tool for the synthetic evaluation of operation schemes for natural gas pipelines.

[1]  Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  An intuitionistic fuzzy grey model for selection problems with an application to the inspection planning in manufacturing firms , 2015, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[2]  Claudemir Duca Vasconcelos,et al.  Network flows modeling applied to the natural gas pipeline in Brazil , 2013 .

[3]  Multilevel Grey Evaluation on the Risk of Chinese Oil Companies’ Transnational M&A Project , 2013 .

[4]  Yung-Hui Lee,et al.  Applying GM (0,N) and Rough Set to Analyze the Business Influence Factor in Bed and Breakfast- A Case Study of a Taitung Bed and Breakfast , 2016 .

[5]  Dariush Jafari,et al.  Assessing and optimization of pipeline system performance using intelligent systems , 2014 .

[6]  Chen Yao,et al.  Multi-level grey evaluation of corporate sustainable growth , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services.

[7]  Lionel Amodeo,et al.  Optimization of natural gas pipeline transportation using ant colony optimization , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[8]  Sifeng Liu,et al.  Explanation of terms of grey clustering evaluation models , 2017, Grey Syst. Theory Appl..

[9]  D. Schmoldt,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making , 2001, Managing Forest Ecosystems.

[10]  K. S. Chapman,et al.  Nonisothermal Transient Flow in Natural Gas Pipeline , 2008 .

[11]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[12]  W. A. Poe,et al.  Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing , 2006 .

[13]  Min Fu,et al.  The Investment Decision-Making Index System and the Grey Comprehensive Evaluation Method under Hybrid Cloud , 2012 .

[14]  Chen Sen.  Adaptive optimal route selection based on gray evaluation theory , 2003 .

[15]  T. Saaty.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[16]  Hui-Ping Tserng,et al.  A Grey System Theory-Based Default Prediction Model for Construction Firms , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[17]  Wenlong Jia,et al.  An improved Parrish-Prausnitz (P-P) model to predict the hydrate formation condition of natural gas with a high volume content of CO2 , 2017 .

[18]  Sifeng Liu,et al.  A multi-variable grey model with a self-memory component and its application on engineering prediction , 2015, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[19]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  Design concept evaluation in product development using rough sets and grey relation analysis , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Shiguo Xu,et al.  Application of Grey Clustering Method in Eutrophication Assessment of Wetland , 2006 .

[21]  Changjun Li,et al.  A MULTI-HIERARCHY GREY RELATIONAL ANALYSIS MODEL FOR NATURAL GAS PIPELINE OPERATION SCHEMES COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION , 2012 .

[22]  Javad Mahmoudimehr,et al.  Optimal design of a natural gas transmission network layout , 2013 .

[23]  Fariborz Rahimnia,et al.  Application of grey theory approach to evaluation of organizational vision , 2011, Grey Syst. Theory Appl..

[24]  Xia Wu,et al.  Optimal operation of trunk natural gas pipelines via an inertia-adaptive particle swarm optimization algorithm , 2014 .

[25]  Wong Wing-gun,et al.  Gray Evaluation Method of Concrete Pavement Comprehensive Condition , 1999 .

[26]  Roger Z. Ríos-Mercado,et al.  Optimization problems in natural gas transportation systems. A state-of-the-art review , 2015 .

[27]  Jeffrey Yi-Lin Forrest,et al.  The Current Developing Status on Grey System Theory , 2007 .

[28]  Sifeng Liu,et al.  Advances in grey systems research , 2010 .

[29]  Ming Jiang,et al.  Grey System Theory based prediction for topic trend on Internet , 2014, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[30]  Changjun Li,et al.  Application of Multi-hierarchy Grey Relational Analysis to Evaluating Natural Gas Pipeline Operation Schemes , 2011, CSIE 2011.

[31]  Yi Lin,et al.  Grey Systems: Theory and Applications , 2010 .

[32]  Jing Ye,et al.  A novel grey fixed weight cluster model based on interval grey numbers , 2017, Grey Syst. Theory Appl..

[33]  Changjun Li,et al.  Operation Optimization of Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines Based on Stochastic Optimization Algorithms: A Review , 2018 .

[34]  J. Deng,et al.  Introduction to Grey system theory , 1989 .