Drag minimization using active and passive flow control techniques

Abstract The objective of this paper is to appraise the practicability of weakening the shock wave and hereby reducing the wave drag in transonic flight regime using flow control devices such as two-dimensional contour bump, individual jet actuator, and also the hybrid control which includes both control devices together, and thereby to gain the desired improvements in aerodynamic performance of air-vehicle. To validate the numerical study, a natural laminar flow airfoil, Rae 5243 , is chosen and then comparisons with experimental data have been made before the optimization of flow control parameters. After validation study, an efficient gradient-based optimization technique is used to optimize 2D bump parameters including the length, the maximum height, the bump position via shock location, and the crest position via bump and also the jet actuation parameters such as mass flow coefficient, suction/blowing angle, actuation location over the upper surface of the airfoil. The process generally consists of using the simulation code to obtain a flow solution for given parameters and then search the optimum parameters to reduce the total drag of the airfoil via the optimizer. Most importantly, it is shown that, the optimization yields 3.94% decrease in the total drag and 5.03% increase in lift, varying the design parameters of active and passive control devices.

[1]  Holger Babinsky,et al.  A combined experimental and numerical study of flow structures over three-dimensional shock control bumps , 2008 .

[2]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak,et al.  Flow Control: The Future , 2001 .

[3]  Lakshmi N. Sankar,et al.  Drag Reduction Studies Using Active Flow Control , 2008 .

[4]  G. Bergeles,et al.  Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design , 2012 .

[5]  Avi Seifert,et al.  Suction and Oscillatory Blowing Actuator Modeling and Validation , 2008 .

[6]  Yoram Yadlin,et al.  Flow Control for the Systematic Buildup of High-Lift Systems , 2006 .

[7]  E. Stanewsky Drag reduction by shock and boundary layer control : results of the project EUROSHOCK II, supported by the European Union, 1996-1999 , 2002 .

[8]  N. Qin,et al.  Numerical study of active shock control for transonic aerodynamics , 2004 .

[9]  M. Meunier Simulation and Optimization of Flow Control Strategies for Novel High-Lift Configurations , 2009 .

[10]  Ramesh Agarwal,et al.  Numerical Study of Transonic Drag Reduction for Flow Past Airfoils Using Active Flow Control , 2009 .

[11]  Oktay Baysal,et al.  Vibrational genetic algorithm enhanced with fuzzy logic and neural networks , 2010 .

[12]  Anthony E. Washburn,et al.  Active Flow Control Activities at NASA Langley , 2013 .

[13]  Raymond P. LeBeau,et al.  Optimization of Airfoil Flow Control Using a Genetic Algorithm with Diversity Control , 2007 .

[14]  H. Rosemann,et al.  Shock control on a swept wing , 2000 .

[15]  Régis Duvigneau,et al.  Simulation and Optimization of Aerodynamic Stall Control Using a Synthetic Jet , 2004 .

[17]  Zhong-Hua Han,et al.  Optimization of Active Flow Control over an Airfoil Using Surrogate Management Framework , 2009 .

[18]  Rafael Fernandes de Oliveira,et al.  Methods for Preliminary Airfoil Optimization , 2009 .

[19]  Osama A. Kandil,et al.  Optimization of Active Flow Control in Transonic Aerodynamics , 2009 .

[20]  Ning Qin,et al.  Active control of transonic aerodynamics using suction, blowing, bumps and synthetic jets , 2000 .

[21]  E Stanewsky,et al.  Adaptive wing and flow control technology , 2001 .