Enablers and barriers for energy prosumption: Conceptual review and an integrated analysis of business models

[1]  Liangpeng Wu,et al.  Impact of the green credit policy on external financing, economic growth and energy consumption of the manufacturing industry , 2022, Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment.

[2]  Jose A. Guajardo.  Repayment performance for pay-as-you-go solar lamps , 2021, Energy for Sustainable Development.

[3]  H. Henning,et al.  Modeling of Persistence, Non-Acceptance and Sufficiency in Long-Term Energy Scenarios for Germany , 2021, Energies.

[4]  J. Gregg,et al.  How Is Social Acceptance Reflected in National Renewable Energy Plans? Evidence from Three Wind-Rich Countries , 2021, Energies.

[5]  B. Dias,et al.  Innovative business models as drivers for prosumers integration - Enablers and barriers , 2021, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[6]  Julia Cousse.  Still in love with solar energy? Installation size, affect, and the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies , 2021, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[7]  José Ángel Gimeno,et al.  Financial Resources for the Investments in Renewable Self-Consumption in a Circular Economy Framework , 2021, Sustainability.

[8]  M. Kubli,et al.  Business strategies for flexibility aggregators to steer clear of being “too small to bid” , 2021 .

[9]  T. Choi,et al.  From co-consumption to co-production: A systematic review and research synthesis of collaborative consumption practices , 2021 .

[10]  Taehoon Hong,et al.  Development of the business feasibility evaluation model for a profitable P2P electricity trading by estimating the optimal trading price , 2021 .

[11]  A. Haque,et al.  Why do low-income urban dwellers reject energy technologies? Exploring the socio-cultural acceptance of solar adoption in Mumbai and Cape Town , 2021 .

[12]  J. Anable,et al.  Innovative energy business models appeal to specific consumer groups but may exacerbate existing inequalities for the disengaged , 2021, Nature Energy.

[13]  Y. Hao,et al.  Assessment of the Public Acceptance and Utilization of Renewable Energy in Pakistan , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  Phillipa Watson,et al.  The precursors of acceptance for a prosumer-led transition to a future smart grid , 2021, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[15]  J. Anable,et al.  Matching consumer segments to innovative utility business models , 2021, Nature Energy.

[16]  I. Bisaga,et al.  Examining the Journey of a Pay-as-You-Go Solar Home System Customer: A Case Study of Rwanda , 2021, Energies.

[17]  P. Upham,et al.  What is needed for citizen-centered urban energy transitions: Insights on attitudes towards decentralized energy storage , 2020 .

[18]  H. Auer,et al.  PV sharing in local communities: Peer-to-peer trading under consideration of the prosumers’ willingness-to-pay , 2020 .

[19]  Kevin A. Melendez,et al.  A Nash-bargaining model for trading of electricity between aggregations of peers , 2020 .

[20]  M. Segreto,et al.  Trends in Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Across Europe—A Literature Review , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[21]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Keep it local and low-key: Social acceptance of alpine solar power projects , 2020 .

[22]  Javier López Prol,et al.  Photovoltaic self-consumption is now profitable in Spain: Effects of the new regulation on prosumers’ internal rate of return , 2020 .

[23]  P. Hansen,et al.  Agent-Based Model of a Blockchain Enabled Peer-to-Peer Energy Market: Application for a Neighborhood Trial in Perth, Australia , 2020, Smart Cities.

[24]  L. Maturi,et al.  Optimal Simulation of Three Peer to Peer (P2P) Business Models for Individual PV Prosumers in a Local Electricity Market Using Agent-Based Modelling , 2020, Buildings.

[25]  Tao Chen,et al.  Agent-based modeling and simulation of the electricity market with residential demand response , 2020 .

[26]  Francesco D’Ettorre,et al.  On the assessment and control optimisation of demand response programs in residential buildings , 2020, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[27]  Alexander Goudz,et al.  Blockchain-technology in the energy industry: blockchain as a driver of the energy revolution? With focus on the situation in Germany , 2020 .

[28]  Rolandas Urbonas,et al.  Net-Metering Compared to Battery-Based Electricity Storage in a Single-Case PV Application Study Considering the Lithuanian Context , 2020, Energies.

[29]  Marc Londo,et al.  Alternatives for current net metering policy for solar PV in the Netherlands: A comparison of impacts on business case and purchasing behaviour of private homeowners, and on governmental costs , 2020 .

[30]  C. Susilawati,et al.  A techno-economic evaluation of Virtual Net Metering for the Australian community housing sector , 2020 .

[31]  Adisorn Leelasantitham,et al.  A Business Model Guideline of Electricity Utility Systems Based on Blockchain Technology in Thailand: A Case Study of Consumers, Prosumers and SMEs , 2020, Wireless Personal Communications.

[32]  Esther Marín-González,et al.  Collective Renewable Energy Prosumers and the Promises of the Energy Union: Taking Stock , 2020 .

[33]  Stephen Hall,et al.  Prosumers in the post subsidy era: an exploration of new prosumer business models in the UK , 2019, Energy Policy.

[34]  R. Madlener,et al.  Energy Supplier 2.0: A conceptual business model for energy suppliers aggregating flexible distributed assets and policy issues raised , 2019 .

[35]  Marcel Antal,et al.  A Fog Computing Enabled Virtual Power Plant Model for Delivery of Frequency Restoration Reserve Services , 2019, Sensors.

[36]  Nand K. Meena,et al.  Optimisation framework for the design and operation of open-market urban and remote community microgrids , 2019, Applied Energy.

[37]  Miguel Brito,et al.  Prosumer aggregation policies, country experience and business models , 2019, Energy Policy.

[38]  S. Winter,et al.  The German feed-in tariff revisited - an empirical investigation on its distributional effects , 2019, Energy Policy.

[39]  L. Varga,et al.  Community Energy Retail Tariffs in Singapore: Opportunities for Peer-to-Peer and Time-of-Use Versus Vertically Integrated Tariffs , 2019, The Journal of Energy Markets.

[40]  Stefano Moroni,et al.  Energy communities in the transition to a low-carbon future: A taxonomical approach and some policy dilemmas. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[41]  Yury Dvorkin,et al.  A P2P-Dominant Distribution System Architecture , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[42]  Ruud Egging,et al.  Prosumer integration in wholesale electricity markets: Synergies of peer-to-peer trade and residential storage , 2019, Energy and Buildings.

[43]  Debajit Palit,et al.  Pay-As-You-Go financing: A model for viable and widespread deployment of solar home systems in rural India , 2019, Energy for Sustainable Development.

[44]  Sandeep Pai,et al.  Pay-As-You-Go: How a Business Model Is Helping Light Millions of Rural Kenyan Homes with Solar , 2018 .

[45]  Nadeem Javaid,et al.  An Efficient Energy Management Approach Using Fog-as-a-Service for Sharing Economy in a Smart Grid , 2018, Energies.

[46]  John Ahmet Erkoyuncu,et al.  A systematic review of Augmented Reality content-related techniques for knowledge transfer in maintenance applications , 2018, Comput. Ind..

[47]  Marine Boyaval,et al.  One for all and all for one? The bliss and torment in communal entrepreneurship , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[48]  Henri van Soest,et al.  Peer-to-peer electricity trading: A review of the legal context , 2018, Competition and Regulation in Network Industries.

[49]  Donal Brown.  Business models for residential retrofit in the UK: a critical assessment of five key archetypes , 2018 .

[50]  M. Kroesen,et al.  Trust, awareness, and independence: Insights from a socio-psychological factor analysis of citizen knowledge and participation in community energy systems , 2018 .

[51]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  The flexible prosumer: Measuring the willingness to co-create distributed flexibility , 2018 .

[52]  R. Madlener,et al.  Technology, Business Model, and Market Design Adaptation Toward Smart Electricity Distribution: Insights for Policy Making , 2018, Energy Policy.

[53]  Hajir Pourbabak,et al.  The Next-Generation U.S. Retail Electricity Market with Customers and Prosumers—A Bibliographical Survey , 2017 .

[54]  Joy Dalmacio Billanes,et al.  Aggregation Potentials for Buildings—Business Models of Demand Response and Virtual Power Plants , 2017 .

[55]  Slavko Krajcar,et al.  Exploring the Potential of Energy Consumers in Smart Grid Using Focus Group Methodology , 2017 .

[56]  H. Cruickshank,et al.  Shedding light on the last mile: a study on the diffusion of pay as you go solar home systems in Central East Africa , 2017 .

[57]  J. Gast,et al.  Doing business in a green way: A systematic review of the ecological sustainability entrepreneurship literature and future research directions , 2017 .

[58]  M. Arentsen,et al.  Prosumption and the distribution and supply of electricity , 2016 .

[59]  Nian Liu,et al.  Multi-Party Energy Management for Clusters of Roof Leased PV Prosumers: A Game Theoretical Approach , 2016 .

[60]  F. Faria,et al.  Economic feasibility analysis of small scale PV systems in different countries , 2016 .

[61]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  Electricity market design for the prosumer era , 2016, Nature Energy.

[62]  A. Audenaert,et al.  Comparison of support policies for residential photovoltaic systems in the major EU markets through investment profitability , 2016 .

[63]  Bastien Girod,et al.  Profitability in absence of subsidies: A techno-economic analysis of rooftop photovoltaic self-consumption in residential and commercial buildings , 2016 .

[64]  C. Büscher,et al.  “Trust” and “confidence” as socio-technical problems in the transformation of energy systems , 2015 .

[65]  F. Sioshansi.  Electricity utility business not as usual , 2015 .

[66]  Mohammad Abdullah Al Faruque,et al.  Design Space Exploration for the Profitability of a Rule-Based Aggregator Business Model Within a Residential Microgrid , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[67]  M. A. Faruque,et al.  Energy Management-as-a-Service Over Fog Computing Platform , 2015, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[68]  Daniel Nilsson,et al.  Photovoltaic self-consumption in buildings : A review , 2015 .

[69]  Waldo Saul Pérez-Aguiar,et al.  Business Models in the Smart Grid: Challenges, Opportunities and Proposals for Prosumer Profitability , 2014 .

[70]  A. Löschel,et al.  The Impact of a Feed-In Tariff on Wind Power Development in Germany , 2014, Resource and Energy Economics.

[71]  F. Boons,et al.  Business Models for Sustainable Innovation: State of the Art and Steps Towards a Research Agenda , 2013 .

[72]  R. Amit,et al.  The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research , 2011 .

[73]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[74]  A. Booth,et al.  A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.

[75]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review , 2003 .

[76]  R. Amit,et al.  Value creation in E‐business , 2001 .

[77]  Ahmed Abbou,et al.  Short-term self consumption PV plant power production forecasts based on hybrid CNN-LSTM, ConvLSTM models , 2021 .

[78]  F. Lezama,et al.  Bidding in local electricity markets with cascading wholesale market integration , 2021 .

[79]  Shaomin Zhang,et al.  An optimal scheduling scheme for smart home electricity considering demand response and privacy protection , 2021 .

[80]  Petri Ahokangas,et al.  EaaS : electricity as a service? , 2019 .

[81]  Manuel A. Matos,et al.  Flexibility products and markets: Literature review , 2018 .