The reverse modality effect: Examining student learning from interactive computer-based instruction

The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of modality on learning from multimedia instruction. This study utilized a factorial between-subject design to examine the effects of modality on student learning outcomes, study patterns and mental effort. An interactive computer-presented diagram was developed to teach the places of articulation in human speech. A total of 151 undergraduate students at a large southwestern university in USA participated in this study. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two modality conditions (ie, written text and spoken text). Data were obtained through surveys, student logs and knowledge tests. Findings revealed a reverse modality effect, wherein participants who studied with written text outperformed those who studied with spoken text. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning , 2002 .

[2]  Eliane Segers,et al.  The modality effect tested in children in a user-paced multimedia environment , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[3]  A. Colman,et al.  Modality of Communication and Recall of Health-related Information , 1997, Journal of health psychology.

[4]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning , 2010 .

[5]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. , 2011 .

[6]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive e-learning , 2005 .

[7]  T. Gog,et al.  Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[8]  Barrie Gunter,et al.  Children's and adults' recall of children's news stories in both print and audio-visual presentation modalities , 2002 .

[9]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory, the transient information effect and e-learning , 2012 .

[10]  Siyuan Chen,et al.  A comparison of four methods for cognitive load measurement , 2011, OZCHI.

[11]  F. Paas,et al.  Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach , 1994 .

[12]  Steven M. Crooks,et al.  Modality and cueing in multimedia learning: Examining cognitive and perceptual explanations for the modality effect , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  H. Tabbers,et al.  Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: effects of modality and cueing. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[14]  A. Paivio.  Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[15]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[16]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[17]  R. Curtis,et al.  Designing health communication: Testing the explanations for the impact of communication medium on effectiveness , 2000 .

[18]  Florian Schmidt-Weigand,et al.  Explaining the modality and contiguity effects: New insights from investigating students' viewing behaviour , 2010 .

[19]  F. Paas,et al.  Instructional Efficiency: Revisiting the Original Construct in Educational Research , 2008 .

[20]  Pavlo D. Antonenko,et al.  Using Electroencephalography to Measure Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[21]  Paul Ayres.  Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems , 2006 .

[22]  D. Leutner,et al.  Direct Measurement of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[23]  Klaus D. Stiller,et al.  How pacing of multimedia instructions can influence modality effects: A case of superiority of visual texts , 2009 .

[24]  Jongpil Cheon,et al.  Examining the relationships of different cognitive load types related to user interface in web-based instruction , 2012 .

[25]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animation as an Aid to Multimedia Learning , 2002 .

[26]  Huib K. Tabbers,et al.  Learner control in animated multimedia instructions , 2010 .

[27]  Nadine Marcus,et al.  The Transient Information Effect: Investigating the Impact of Segmentation on Spoken and Written text , 2012 .

[28]  D. Leutner,et al.  Assessment of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning with Dual-Task Methodology: Auditory Load and Modality Effects , 2004 .

[29]  Paul Ginns.  Meta-Analysis of the Modality Effect. , 2005 .

[30]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: THEORY , 2010 .

[31]  H. Tabbers,et al.  The modality of text in multimedia instructions:Refining the design guidelines. , 2002 .

[32]  Steven M. Crooks,et al.  Exploring the Instructional Conditions for a Reverse Modality Effect in Multimedia Instruction , 2011 .

[33]  T. Gog,et al.  Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning , 2009 .

[34]  Eva Ceulemans,et al.  CHull: A generic convex-hull-based model selection method , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[35]  Robert R. Whelan.  Neuroimaging of cognitive load in instructional multimedia , 2007 .