Patients’ Acceptance of Smartphone Health Technology for Chronic Disease Management: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Test

Background Chronic disease patients often face multiple challenges from difficult comorbidities. Smartphone health technology can be used to help them manage their conditions only if they accept and use the technology. Objective The aim of this study was to develop and test a theoretical model to predict and explain the factors influencing patients’ acceptance of smartphone health technology for chronic disease management. Methods Multiple theories and factors that may influence patients’ acceptance of smartphone health technology have been reviewed. A hybrid theoretical model was built based on the technology acceptance model, dual-factor model, health belief model, and the factors identified from interviews that might influence patients’ acceptance of smartphone health technology for chronic disease management. Data were collected from patient questionnaire surveys and computer log records about 157 hypertensive patients’ actual use of a smartphone health app. The partial least square method was used to test the theoretical model. Results The model accounted for .412 of the variance in patients’ intention to adopt the smartphone health technology. Intention to use accounted for .111 of the variance in actual use and had a significant weak relationship with the latter. Perceived ease of use was affected by patients’ smartphone usage experience, relationship with doctor, and self-efficacy. Although without a significant effect on intention to use, perceived ease of use had a significant positive influence on perceived usefulness. Relationship with doctor and perceived health threat had significant positive effects on perceived usefulness, countering the negative influence of resistance to change. Perceived usefulness, perceived health threat, and resistance to change significantly predicted patients’ intentions to use the technology. Age and gender had no significant influence on patients’ acceptance of smartphone technology. The study also confirmed the positive relationship between intention to use and actual use of smartphone health apps for chronic disease management. Conclusions This study developed a theoretical model to predict patients’ acceptance of smartphone health technology for chronic disease management. Although resistance to change is a significant barrier to technology acceptance, careful management of doctor-patient relationship, and raising patients’ awareness of the negative effect of chronic disease can negate the effect of resistance and encourage acceptance and use of smartphone health technology to support chronic disease management for patients in the community.

[1]  S. Sastry,et al.  Security and Privacy Issues with Health Care Information Technology , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Hyeoun-Ae Park,et al.  Development of a Health Information Technology Acceptance Model Using Consumers’ Health Behavior Intention , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[3]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Francisco Arteaga,et al.  A New Multiblock PLS Based Method to Estimate Causal Models: Application to the Post-Consumption Behavior in Tourism , 2010 .

[5]  Hyeoun-Ae Park,et al.  A Mobile App for Hypertension Management Based on Clinical Practice Guidelines: Development and Deployment , 2016, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[6]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[7]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Physician-Patient Interactions on the Outcomes of Chronic Disease , 1989, Medical care.

[8]  Yongqiang Sun,et al.  The dark side of elderly acceptance of preventive mobile health services in China , 2013, Electron. Mark..

[9]  Patricia Flatley Brennan,et al.  Factors affecting home care patients' acceptance of a web-based interactive self-management technology , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  Zhaohua Deng,et al.  Understanding public users' adoption of mobile health service , 2013, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[11]  Keri K. Stephens,et al.  Design simplicity influences patient portal use: the role of aesthetic evaluations for technology acceptance , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  Georges De Moor,et al.  Introducing telemonitoring for diabetic patients: Development of a telemonitoring 'Health Effect and Readiness' Questionnaire , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[13]  The Nurse-Led Telephone Follow-Up on Medication and Dietary Adherence among Patients after Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial , 2016, International journal of community based nursing and midwifery.

[14]  Noreen M Clark,et al.  Management of chronic disease by patients. , 2003, Annual review of public health.

[15]  Brian D. Janz,et al.  Information Systems and Healthcare XVI: Physician Adoption of Electronic Medical Records: Applying the UTAUT Model in a Healthcare Context , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Ping Yu,et al.  Using diffusion of innovation theory to understand the factors impacting patient acceptance and use of consumer e-health innovations: a case study in a primary care clinic , 2015, BMC Health Services Research.

[17]  M. Becker,et al.  The Health Belief Model: A Decade Later , 1984, Health education quarterly.

[18]  Diego López-de-Ipiña,et al.  Mobile Monitoring and Reasoning Methods to Prevent Cardiovascular Diseases , 2013, Sensors.

[19]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Warren J. Winkelman,et al.  Research Paper: Patient-Perceived Usefulness of Online Electronic Medical Records: Employing Grounded Theory in the Development of Information and Communication Technologies for Use by Patients Living with Chronic Illness , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[21]  Alessandro Puiatti,et al.  Mobile Health Systems for Bipolar Disorder: The Relevance of Non-Functional Requirements in MONARCA Project , 2014, Int. J. Handheld Comput. Res..

[22]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  A generalised adoption model for services: A cross-country comparison of mobile health (m-health) , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[23]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[24]  Xitong Guo,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE ACCEPTANCE OF MOBILE HEALTH SERVICES: A COMPARISON AND INTEGRATION OF ALTERNATIVE MODELS , 2013 .

[25]  Ronald T. Cenfetelli Inhibitors and Enablers as Dual Factor Concepts in Technology Usage , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[27]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Practical Issues in Structural Modeling , 1987 .

[28]  Ming-Chien Hung,et al.  The Adoption of Mobile Health Management Services: An Empirical Study , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[29]  Da Tao,et al.  A 3-Month Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of a Patient-Centered, Computer-Based Self-Monitoring System for the Care of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension , 2016, Journal of Medical Systems.

[30]  Jackson T. Wright,et al.  2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). , 2014, JAMA.

[31]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Public views of mobile medical devices and services: A US national survey of consumer sentiments towards RFID healthcare technology , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[32]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[33]  David Kotz,et al.  Privacy in mobile technology for personal healthcare , 2012, CSUR.

[34]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[35]  M. Lindwall,et al.  Improved Blood Pressure Control Using an Interactive Mobile Phone Support System , 2015, Journal of clinical hypertension.

[36]  Dohoon Kim,et al.  Key functional characteristics in designing and operating health information websites for user satisfaction: An application of the extended technology acceptance model , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[37]  Zhaohua Deng,et al.  Comparison of the middle-aged and older users' adoption of mobile health services in China , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[38]  Fan-Yun Pai,et al.  Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to the introduction of healthcare information systems , 2011 .

[39]  Guanrong Zhang,et al.  Mobile Phone-Based Lifestyle Intervention for Reducing Overall Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Guangzhou, China: A Pilot Study , 2015, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[40]  Henry Been-Lirn Duh,et al.  A study on Singaporean women's acceptance of using mobile phones to seek health information , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[41]  J. Franek Self-management support interventions for persons with chronic disease: an evidence-based analysis. , 2013, Ontario health technology assessment series.

[42]  A. Haines,et al.  The effectiveness of M-health technologies for improving health and health services: a systematic review protocol , 2010, BMC Research Notes.

[43]  Shannon M. Canfield,et al.  Development of the PRE-HIT instrument: patient readiness to engage in health information technology , 2014, BMC Family Practice.

[44]  In Young Choi,et al.  Factors influencing the acceptance of telemedicine for diabetes management , 2014, Cluster Computing.

[45]  E. Vance Wilson,et al.  Modeling patients' acceptance of provider-delivered e-health. , 2004, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[46]  Ping Yu,et al.  Health IT acceptance factors in long-term care facilities: A cross-sectional survey , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[47]  David W. Bates,et al.  White Paper: Personal Health Records: Definitions, Benefits, and Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adoption , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..