Context congruity effects of online product recommendations: an eye-tracking study

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand how the context congruity effects of online product recommendations (PRs) by recommendation agents (RAs) influence consumers’ attention to and memory of recommended products in an online shopping environment. Design/methodology/approach The study focuses on the context congruity effects of online PRs by examining consumers’ browsing patterns and attention characteristics (fixation counts and fixation duration) using an eye-tracking device and by measuring memory performance with an aided memory test. Three types of PRs (highly congruent, lowly congruent and incongruent PRs) and two degrees of involvement (high and low involvement) are considered. Findings The results of the gaze data show that context congruity effects can influence consumers’ PR attention, but this effect is not moderated by involvements. The results of the memory data show that PR recognition is influenced not only by context congruity effects but also by involvement. Another significant finding is that attention to a PR does not necessarily guarantee better memory performance. Practical implications The study significantly contributes to deepening the understanding of how context congruity can influence consumers’ attention to and memory of PRs. The findings also have important managerial and practical implications, such that selecting and presenting PRs should be based on context congruity effects. Originality/value First, introducing context congruity effects to investigate the effectiveness of online PRs by RAs not only provides an important theoretical contribution to research on recommendation effectiveness but also enriches its application. Second, the findings suggest that the relationship between visual attention and memory is not definitely positive. Third, to interpret the complex translation process from attention to memory, the authors propose a methodology that considers stimulus attributes, issue involvement, cognitive capacity and cognitive interference.

[1]  J. Bargh,et al.  Nature of Priming Effects on Categorization , 1985 .

[2]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Adaptive personalization using social networks , 2015, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[3]  Gary Bente,et al.  Reintegrating the Ad , 2015, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[4]  Annie Lang,et al.  The limited capacity model of mediated message processing , 2000 .

[5]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Sigal Segev,et al.  The effects of ad–context congruency on responses to advertising in blogs , 2014 .

[7]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What Is Incongruency? , 1992 .

[8]  C. M. King,et al.  Impacts of Website Context Relevance on Banner Advertisement Effectiveness , 2010 .

[9]  P. Neijens,et al.  The Effects of Magazine-Induced Psychological Responses and Thematic Congruence on Memory and Attitude toward the Ad in a Real-Life Setting , 2002 .

[10]  Hao Liu,et al.  Search product and experience product online reviews: An eye-tracking study on consumers' review search behavior , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[12]  Silvia Heinz,et al.  The influence of banner placement and navigation style on the recognition of advertisement banners , 2012, NordiCHI.

[13]  Hyejin Bang,et al.  Tracking users' visual attention and responses to personalized advertising based on task cognitive demand , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Silvia Heinz,et al.  Online ad banners: the effects of goal orientation and content congruence on memory , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[15]  Zafar Ali,et al.  Recommender Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Research Opportunities , 2016 .

[16]  Hyejin Bang,et al.  Distraction effects of contextual advertising on online news processing: an eye-tracking study , 2016, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[17]  Marco Porta,et al.  Online newspapers and ad banners: an eye tracking study on the effects of congruity , 2013, Online Inf. Rev..

[18]  M. Just,et al.  Eye fixations and cognitive processes , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  P. Herr,et al.  Motivated Search: Effects of Choice Accountability, Issue Involvement, and Prior Knowledge on Information Acquisition and Use , 1999 .

[20]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and scene perception. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[21]  Chang-Hoan Cho,et al.  Factors Influencing Clicking of Banner Ads on the WWW , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[22]  P. Herr Priming Price: Prior Knowledge and Context Effects , 1989 .

[23]  Barrie Gunter,et al.  Effects of Product–Program Congruity and Viewer Involvement on Memory for Televised Advertisements1 , 2002 .

[24]  Sojung Kim,et al.  An Examination of Effects of Credibility and Congruency on Consumer Responses to Banner Advertisements , 2012 .