The impacts of household retrofit and domestic energy efficiency schemes: A large scale, ex post evaluation

There is widespread interest in the ability of retrofit schemes to shape domestic energy use in order to tackle fuel poverty and reduce carbon emissions. Although much has been written on the topic, there have been few large-scale ex post evaluations of the actual impacts of such schemes. We address this by assessing domestic energy use before and after the Kirklees Warm Zone (KWZ) scheme, which by fitting insulation in 51,000 homes in the 2007–2010 period is one of the largest retrofit schemes completed in the UK to date. To do this, we develop and apply a new methodology that isolates the impacts of retrofit activity from broader background trends in energy use. The results suggest that the actual impacts of the KWZ scheme have been higher than predicted, and that the scale of any performance gaps or rebound effects have been lower than has often been assumed. They also suggest that impacts on energy use in lower income areas are consistent with predictions, but that impacts in middle and higher income areas are higher than predicted. These findings support the case for the wider and/or accelerated adoption of domestic retrofit schemes in other contexts.

[1]  Gareth Shaw,et al.  Citizens, consumers and sustainability: (Re)Framing environmental practice in an age of climate change , 2011 .

[2]  Ray Galvin,et al.  Economic viability in thermal retrofit policies: Learning from ten years of experience in Germany , 2013 .

[3]  Amy A. Holcombe,et al.  Promoting , 2020, Strategic Talent Leadership for Educators.

[4]  Robert Lowe,et al.  Lessons from Stamford Brook: understanding the gap between designed and real performance , 2008 .

[5]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The energy-efficiency gap What does it mean? , 1994 .

[6]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review , 2009 .

[7]  Françoise Bartiaux,et al.  A practice–theory approach to homeowners' energy retrofits in four European areas , 2014 .

[8]  Fulbright Scholar,et al.  Financing Energy Efficiency Building Retrofits , 2010 .

[9]  Miguel A. Tovar,et al.  The structure of energy efficiency investment in the UK households and its average monetary and environmental savings , 2012 .

[10]  Corrado Topi,et al.  The Economics of Low Carbon Cities: A Mini-Stern Review for the Leeds City Region , 2012 .

[11]  Paul Parker,et al.  Residential energy efficiency retrofits: How program design affects participation and outcomes , 2014 .

[12]  D. Harrison,et al.  Domestic UK retrofit challenge: Barriers, incentives and current performance leading into the Green Deal , 2012 .

[13]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UKhouseholds , 2012 .

[14]  an Rosenowa,et al.  Evaluating the evaluations: Evidence from energy efficiency programmes in Germany and the UK , 2013 .

[15]  Ray Galvin,et al.  Evaluating the evaluations: Evidence from energy efficiency programmes in Germany and the UK , 2013 .

[16]  Arthur Grimes,et al.  Warming Up New Zealand: Impacts of the New Zealand Insulation Fund on Metered Household Energy Use , 2011 .

[17]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Incorporating inhabitants’ everyday practices into domestic retrofits , 2014 .

[18]  S. Sorrell The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency , 2007 .

[19]  Amanda M. Thomson,et al.  Projections of emissions and removals from the LULUCF sector to 2050. Contract report for the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) , 2011 .

[20]  J. Clinch,et al.  Cost-benefit Analysis of Domestic Energy Efficiency , 2001 .

[21]  C. Maller,et al.  Housing renovations and energy efficiency: insights from homeowners’ practices , 2014 .

[22]  Martin Achtnicht,et al.  Factors Influencing German House Owners' Preferences on Energy Retrofits , 2012 .

[23]  P Howden-Chapman,et al.  Retrofitting houses with insulation: a cost–benefit analysis of a randomised community trial , 2009, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[24]  Gert Spaargaren,et al.  Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture. Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order , 2011 .

[25]  Alice Owen,et al.  Unseen influence-The role of low carbon retrofit advisers and installers in the adoption and use of domestic energy technology , 2014 .

[26]  B. Boardman,et al.  Making cold homes warmer: the effect of energy efficiency improvements in low-income homes A report to the Energy Action Grants Agency Charitable Trust , 2000 .

[27]  R. Ozaki,et al.  Entangled Practices: Governance, Sustainable Technologies, and Energy Consumption , 2014 .

[28]  E. Shove Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change , 2010 .