An objective assessment method for image defogging effects

Methods to identify image defogging effects can help evaluate and optimise image defogging algorithms. However, such methods that assess the performance of defogging algorithms or compare them with other algorithms are lacking, whereas existing assessment methods are mostly inadequate. Two new methods to assess defogging effects are therefore proposed in this study. The first method generates synthetic foggy images by using the transmission map of an image degradation model in a full-reference manner. The second method develops an assessment system from the perspective of human visual perception in a no-reference manner. Experimental results from a comparison of defogging algorithms demonstrate the effectiveness and reliability of our proposed methods. Compared with other existing methods, our proposed methods efficiently assess defogging effects from generated synthetic images and human visual perceptions. These methods represent novel approaches to measure defogging effects.

[1]  L. E. Barbrow International Lighting Vocabulary , 1964 .

[2]  Vijayan K. Asari,et al.  Ratio rule and homomorphic filter for enhancement of digital colour image , 2006, Neurocomputing.

[3]  Jian Sun,et al.  Single image haze removal using dark channel prior , 2009, CVPR.

[4]  Patrick Le Callet,et al.  Objective quality assessment of color images based on a generic perceptual reduced reference , 2008, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[5]  W. Adrian,et al.  Visibility of targets: Model for calculation , 1989 .

[6]  Huib de Ridder,et al.  Perceptually optimal color reproduction , 1998, Electronic Imaging.

[7]  Lei Huang,et al.  Research on an Objective Method to Compare the Quality of Defogged Images , 2009, 2009 Chinese Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[8]  Cosmin Ancuti,et al.  Effective single image dehazing by fusion , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[9]  M. V. Rossum,et al.  Multiple scattering of classical waves: microscopy, mesoscopy, and diffusion , 1998, cond-mat/9804141.

[10]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Vision in bad weather , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[11]  Robby T. Tan,et al.  Visibility in bad weather from a single image , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  Paul S. Fisher,et al.  Image quality measures and their performance , 1995, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[14]  M. Wilscy,et al.  Enhancement of Weather Degraded Color Images and Video Sequences Using Wavelet Fusion , 2008, World Congress on Engineering.

[15]  Zhenyang Wu,et al.  Natural color image enhancement and evaluation algorithm based on human visual system , 2006, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[16]  Zia-ur Rahman,et al.  A multiscale retinex for bridging the gap between color images and the human observation of scenes , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[17]  Jean-Philippe Tarel,et al.  Fast visibility restoration from a single color or gray level image , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[18]  Jean-Bernard Martens,et al.  Quality asessment of coded images using numerical category scaling , 1995, Other Conferences.

[19]  Dapeng Li,et al.  Physics-based fast single image fog removal , 2010, IEEE 10th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING PROCEEDINGS.

[20]  Jing Yu,et al.  Color-preserving Defog Method for Foggy or Hazy Scenes , 2009, VISAPP.

[21]  Jean-Philippe Tarel,et al.  BLIND CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT ASSESSMENT BY GRADIENT RATIOING AT VISIBLE EDGES , 2011 .