Developing Pictorial Cigarillo Warnings: Insights From Focus Groups.

INTRODUCTION The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) selected six text-only warnings for cigarillos to be implemented on packaging and advertising. Pictorial warnings are more effective at discouraging cigarette use than text-only warnings, yet no research exists for cigarillos. We sought to understand what types of images might be most effectively paired with the cigarillo text warnings to inform broad principles for developing pictorial warnings, with a focus on young adults, who have the highest rate of cigarillo use. METHODS We conducted five focus groups with a total of N = 30 young adult cigarillo users and susceptible nonusers (53% female, 50% White, and 33% Black). Participants were shown four to eight unique images for each of the six text statements and were asked about visual-verbal congruency, emotional and cognitive reactions, and perceived effectiveness of each image. Sessions were recorded and transcribed; two investigators independently coded transcripts for emergent themes. RESULTS Participants reported images that were graphic or "gross" would best grab attention and discourage use of cigarillos. Participants preferred images that were a direct illustration of the information in the warning text, rather than abstract images that required more cognitive effort to understand. Participants also highlighted that including people in the images, especially youth and young adults making eye contact, helped them relate to the warnings, garner their attention, and positively influence their reactions. CONCLUSIONS We identified several principles to inform the selection of images to pair with the FDA-required cigarillo text statements. These insights may also apply to pictorial warnings for other tobacco products. IMPLICATIONS This focus group study identified principles for selecting images to develop pictorial warnings for the six FDA text-only cigarillo warnings. We found that young adult cigarillo users and susceptible nonusers preferred images that were graphic and gross, believable, congruent to the warning text, and included people. Images that match young adults' visual expectations of a disease and are emotion-provoking may be most effective in pictorial warnings and highlight challenges for developing pictorial warnings for health effects that do not have a visible health consequence.

[1]  S. Noar,et al.  Impact of tobacco-pack pictorial warnings on youth and young adults: A systematic review of experimental studies , 2019, Tobacco induced diseases.

[2]  Amy M. Cohn,et al.  Patterns and correlates of the co-use of marijuana with any tobacco and individual tobacco products in young adults from Wave 2 of the PATH Study. , 2019, Addictive behaviors.

[3]  M. Slater,et al.  Improving health communication with photographic images that increase identification in three minority populations , 2019, Health education research.

[4]  S. Noar,et al.  Systematic Review of Health Communication for Non-Cigarette Tobacco Products , 2019, Health communication.

[5]  Jennifer L. Pearson,et al.  US Adult Cigar Smoking Patterns, Purchasing Behaviors, and Reasons for Use According to Cigar Type: Findings From the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, 2013–2014 , 2018, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[6]  D. Strong,et al.  Marijuana use among US tobacco users: Findings from wave 1 of the population assessment of tobacco health (PATH) study. , 2018, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[7]  N. Freedman,et al.  Association of Cigarette, Cigar, and Pipe Use With Mortality Risk in the US Population , 2018, JAMA internal medicine.

[8]  Bartosz Koszowski,et al.  Cigarillo and Little Cigar Mainstream Smoke Constituents from Replicated Human Smoking. , 2018, Chemical research in toxicology.

[9]  J. Cappella,et al.  Effect of message congruency on attention and recall in pictorial health warning labels , 2017, Tobacco Control.

[10]  T. Neilands,et al.  Factual text and emotional pictures: overcoming a false dichotomy of cigarette warning labels , 2017, Tobacco Control.

[11]  Bartosz Koszowski,et al.  Smoking Behavior and Smoke Constituents from Cigarillos and Little Cigars. , 2017, Tobacco regulatory science.

[12]  Marcella H. Boynton,et al.  Icons for health effects of cigarette smoke: a test of semiotic type , 2017, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[13]  Jennifer L. Pearson,et al.  Tobacco‐Product Use by Adults and Youths in the United States in 2013 and 2014 , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  J. Cappella,et al.  Potential Effectiveness of Pictorial Warning Labels That Feature the Images and Personal Details of Real People , 2016, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[15]  K. Ribisl,et al.  Effects of Strengthening Cigarette Pack Warnings on Attention and Message Processing: A Systematic Review , 2016, Journalism & mass communication quarterly.

[16]  Micah L. Berman,et al.  Emotion in the Law and the Lab: The Case of Graphic Cigarette Warnings. , 2016, Tobacco regulatory science.

[17]  K. Ribisl,et al.  The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies. , 2016, Social science & medicine.

[18]  Noel T Brewer,et al.  Effect of Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings on Changes in Smoking Behavior: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA Internal Medicine.

[19]  Kimberly G. Wagoner,et al.  Adolescent and Young Adult Perceptions of Hookah and Little Cigars/Cigarillos: Implications for Risk Messages , 2016, Journal of health communication.

[20]  P. Fagan,et al.  The Most Natural Tobacco Used: A Qualitative Investigation of Young Adult Smokers' Risk Perceptions of Flavored Little Cigars and Cigarillos. , 2016, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[21]  B. Reboussin,et al.  First tobacco product tried: associations with smoking status and demographics among college students. , 2015, Addictive behaviors.

[22]  Laura A. Gibson,et al.  Assessing the Consequences of Implementing Graphic Warning Labels on Cigarette Packs for Tobacco-Related Health Disparities. , 2015, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[23]  Jessica K Pepper,et al.  Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies , 2015, Tobacco Control.

[24]  B. Apelberg,et al.  Systematic review of cigar smoking and all cause and smoking related mortality , 2015, BMC Public Health.

[25]  L. Cameron,et al.  Which Images and Features in Graphic Cigarette Warnings Predict Their Perceived Effectiveness? Findings from an Online Survey of Residents in the UK , 2015, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[26]  Brian A. King,et al.  Little Filtered Cigar, Cigarillo, and Premium Cigar Smoking Among Adults — United States, 2012–2013 , 2014, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[27]  J. Kraemer,et al.  Analysis of legal and scientific issues in court challenges to graphic tobacco warnings. , 2013, American journal of preventive medicine.

[28]  Ellen P. Goodman Visual gut punch: persuasion, emotion, and the constitutional meaning of graphic disclosure. , 2013, Cornell law review.

[29]  James F. Thrasher,et al.  Impact of Tobacco-Related Health Warning Labels across Socioeconomic, Race and Ethnic Groups: Results from a Randomized Web-Based Experiment , 2013, PloS one.

[30]  D. Hammond,et al.  Perceived effectiveness of pictorial health warnings among Mexican youth and adults: a population-level intervention with potential to reduce tobacco-related inequities , 2012, Cancer Causes & Control.

[31]  David Hammond,et al.  Can pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages address smoking-related health disparities? Field experiments in Mexico to assess pictorial warning label content , 2012, Cancer Causes & Control.

[32]  J. Thrasher,et al.  College student reactions to health warning labels: sociodemographic and psychosocial factors related to perceived effectiveness of different approaches. , 2011, Preventive medicine.

[33]  David Hammond,et al.  Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review , 2011, Tobacco Control.

[34]  Amanda M. Beacom,et al.  Communicating Health Information to Disadvantaged Populations , 2009, Family & community health.

[35]  B. Curbow,et al.  Harm perception of nicotine products in college freshmen. , 2007, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[36]  Michael S. Mulvey,et al.  Invoking the Rhetorical Power of Character to Create Identifications , 2003 .

[37]  Robin L. Nabi Reasoning through emotion: An explication and test of a cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall , 1999 .

[38]  Paul Messaris,et al.  Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising , 1996 .

[39]  E. Gilpin,et al.  Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States. , 1996, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[40]  D. Cicchetti Emotion and Adaptation , 1993 .

[41]  H. Chandler Database , 1985 .

[42]  Edward T. Hall,et al.  A System for the Notation of Proxemic Behavior1 , 1963 .

[43]  G. Keijzers,et al.  Tobacco-Product Use by Adults and Youths in the United States in 2013 and 2014. , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  Birgit Wirtz,et al.  Visual Intelligence: Perception, Image, and Manipulation in Visual Communication , 1997 .

[45]  H. Morgenstern,et al.  Diet and the risk of head and neck cancer: a pooled analysis in the INHANCE consortium , 2011, Cancer Causes & Control.

[46]  Judith Green,et al.  Qualitative methods for health research , 2004 .