Differential effects Of Speaker and Vowel Variability on Fricative Perception

Previous research has shown that listeners' identifications of synthetic fricative noises are influenced by both rounding on an adjacent vowel and by the sex of the speaker who produced the adjacent vowel. In each case, contextual information which indicates a longer vocal tract during the production of the fricative (vowel rounding, or male speaker) results in fewer “sh” responses to the items in an [s] to [f] continuum (i.e., listeners expect generally lower vocal tract resonances from longer vocal tracts). The experiments reported here indicate that these superficially similar perceptual effects interact differently with manipulations of presentation type (blocked vs. randomized) and the interstimulus interval. When tokens produced by different speakers were presented blocked by speaker, the perceptual effect of speaker differences was reduced, and the degree of reduction depended on interstimulus interval. However, neither of these manipulations had an impact on the perceptual effect of vowel rounding.

[1]  G. W. Hughes,et al.  Spectral Properties of Fricative Consonants , 1956 .

[2]  P. Strevens Spectra of Fricative Noise in Human Speech , 1960 .

[3]  K. Stevens,et al.  On the Properties of Voiceless Fricative Consonants , 1961 .

[4]  M. F. Schwartz,et al.  Identification of speaker sex from isolated, voiceless fricatives. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  D. Pisoni Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[6]  J. G. May Vocal tract normalization for /s/ and /š/ , 1976 .

[7]  V. Mann,et al.  Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction , 1978 .

[8]  D. Whalen Effects of vocalic formant transitions and vowel quality on the English [s]-[ŝ] boundary. , 1981, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Christine H. Shadle,et al.  The acoustics of fricative consonants , 1986 .

[10]  Shizuo Hiki,et al.  Influence of palate shape on lingual articulation , 1986, Speech Commun..

[11]  H. S. Gopal,et al.  A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Contrast and normalization in vowel perception , 1990 .

[14]  D. Klatt,et al.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Keith Johnson,et al.  The role of perceived speaker identity in F0 normalization of vowels. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Pierre Badin Fricative consonants: acoustic and X-ray measurements , 1991 .

[17]  Method for the location of burst-onset spectra in the auditory-perceptual space: a study of place of articulation in voiceless stop consonants. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  V. Mann,et al.  Perceptual order and the effect of vocalic context on fricative perception , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.