Fundamental limits and scaling behavior of cooperative multicasting in wireless networks

A framework is developed for analyzing capacity gains from user cooperation in slow-fading wireless networks when the number of nodes (network size) is large. The framework is illustrated for the case of a simple multipath-rich Rayleigh-fading channel model. Both unicasting (one source and one destination) and multicasting (one source and several destinations) scenarios are considered. We introduce a meaningful notion of Shannon capacity for such systems, evaluate this capacity as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and develop a simple two-phase cooperative network protocol that achieves it. We observe that the resulting capacity is the same for both unicasting and multicasting, but show that the network size required to achieve any target error probability is smaller for unicasting than for multicasting. Finally, we introduce the notion of a network "scaling exponent" to quantify the rate of decay of error probability with network size as a function of the targeted fraction of the capacity. This exponent provides additional insights to system designers by enabling a finer grain comparison of candidate cooperative transmission protocols in even moderately sized networks.

[1]  Elza Erkip,et al.  User cooperation diversity. Part I. System description , 2003, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[2]  Lizhong Zheng,et al.  Diversity-multiplexing tradeoff in multiple-access channels , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Distributed space-time-coded protocols for exploiting cooperative diversity in wireless networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  Helmut Bölcskei,et al.  Fading relay channels: performance limits and space-time signal design , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[5]  Holger Boche,et al.  Information Theory Outage probability in multiple antenna systems , 2007, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[6]  Narayan Prasad,et al.  Diversity and multiplexing tradeoff bounds for cooperative diversity protocols , 2004, International Symposium onInformation Theory, 2004. ISIT 2004. Proceedings..

[7]  Aggelos Bletsas,et al.  A simple Cooperative diversity method based on network path selection , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  Shlomo Shamai,et al.  Information theoretic considerations for cellular mobile radio , 1994 .

[9]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  Multiple-antenna channel hardening and its implications for rate feedback and scheduling , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  H. Boche,et al.  Outage probability of multiple antenna systems: optimal transmission and impact of correlation , 2004, International Zurich Seminar on Communications, 2004.

[12]  Lizhong Zheng,et al.  Diversity and multiplexing: a fundamental tradeoff in multiple-antenna channels , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  Philip Schniter,et al.  On the achievable diversity-multiplexing tradeoff in half-duplex cooperative channels , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[14]  Emre Telatar,et al.  Capacity of Multi-antenna Gaussian Channels , 1999, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[15]  D. A. Bell,et al.  Information Theory and Reliable Communication , 1969 .

[16]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .