What Is the Correlation of In Vivo Wear and Damage Patterns With In Vitro TDR Motion Response?

Study Design. This study combined the evaluation of retrieved total disc replacements (TDRs) with a biomechanical study using human lumbar spines. Thirty-eight CHARITÉ TDRs were retrieved from 32 patients after 7.3 years average implantation. All implants were removed because of intractable back pain and/or facet degeneration. In parallel, 20 new implants were evaluated at L4–L5 and L5–S1 in an in vitro lumbar spine model. Objective. The purpose of this study was to correlate wear and damage patterns in retrieved TDRs with motion patterns observed in an in vitro lumbar spine model. We also sought to determine whether one-sided wear and motion patterns were associated with greater in vivo wear. Summary of Background Data. The comparison of polyethylene wear in TDRs after long-term implantation to those tested using an in vitro model had not yet been investigated. Methods. The wear patterns of each retrieved PE core was analyzed at the rim and dome. Thirty-five cores were further analyzed using MicroCT to determine the penetration symmetry. For the in vitro study the implants were tested under physiologic loads using a validated cadaveric model. Motion patterns of the in vitro-tested implants were tracked using sequential video-fluoroscopy. Results. Fifteen of 35 retrieved cores (43%) displayed one-sided wear patterns. Significant correlations were observed between implantation time and penetration and penetration rate. In the in vitro study, there was evidence of motion at both articulations, motion at both articulation but predominantly at the top articulation, and solelyat the top articulation. Core entrapment and pinching was observed and associated with visual evidence of core bending or deformation. Conclusion. This is the first study to directly compare the long-term PE wear and damage mechanisms in TDR retrievals with the motion patterns generated by a validated in vitro cadaveric testing model. The retrievals exhibited wear patterns consistent with the in vitro testing.

[1]  T. David.  Long-term Results of One-Level Lumbar Arthroplasty: Minimum 10-Year Follow-up of the CHARITÉ Artificial Disc in 106 Patients , 2007, Spine.

[2]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Polyethylene Wear Debris and Long-term Clinical Failure of the Charité Disc Prosthesis: A Study of 4 Patients , 2007, Spine.

[3]  J. P. Johnson,et al.  Access strategies for revision or explantation of the Charité lumbar artificial disc replacement. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  J. Lawless,et al.  Small-Building Defense Against Terrorism 016 , 2006 .

[5]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Retrieval Analysis of Total Disc Replacements: Implications for Standardized Wear Testing , 2006 .

[6]  J. Stieber,et al.  Early failure of lumbar disc replacement: case report and review of the literature. , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[7]  Carsten Perka,et al.  Charité total disc replacement—clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[8]  Avinash G Patwardhan,et al.  Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[9]  François Lavaste,et al.  Clinical and Radiological Outcomes With the Charité™ Artificial Disc: A 10-Year Minimum Follow-Up , 2005, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[10]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[11]  T. David.  Revision of a Charité artificial disc 9.5 years in vivo to a new Charité artificial disc: case report and explant analysis , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[12]  B. Cunningham.  Basic scientific considerations in total disc arthroplasty. , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[13]  Bryan W Cunningham,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Total Disc Replacement Arthroplasty: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model , 2003, Spine.

[14]  B. Cunningham,et al.  General Principles of Total Disc Replacement Arthroplasty: Seventeen Cases in a Nonhuman Primate Model , 2003, Spine.

[15]  B. Cunningham,et al.  General Principles of Total Disc Replacement Arthroplasty , 2003 .

[16]  F. Oner,et al.  Complications of Artificial Disc Replacement: A Report of 27 Patients with the SB Charité Disc , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[17]  T D Brown,et al.  Finite element analysis of acetabular wear. Validation, and backing and fixation effects. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  J. Archard.  Contact and Rubbing of Flat Surfaces , 1953 .

[19]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Polyethylene wear and rim fracture in total disc arthroplasty. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[20]  Steven M. Kurtz,et al.  Total Disc Arthroplasty , 2006 .

[21]  P. McAfee,et al.  The Artificial Disc , 2003, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[22]  U. Fernström.  Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprothesis in herniated disc and in painful disc. , 1966, Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum.