Algorithm Integration Behavior for Discovering Group Membership Rules

Information exploitation processes use different data mining algorithms for obtaining knowledge patterns from data obtained on the problem domain. One of the assumptions when working with these algorithms is that the complexity of the membership domain of the cases they use does not affect the quality of the obtained results. So, it is important to analyze the behavior of the information exploitation process through the discovery of group membership rules by using clustering and induction algorithms. This research characterizes the complexity of the domains in terms of the pieces of knowledge that describe them and information exploitation processes they seek to discover. The results of the experiments show that, in the case of the process for discovering group membership rules, the quality of the patterns differs depending on the algorithms used in the process and the complexity of the domains to which they are applied.

[1]  Esteban Moro,et al.  Big Data Versus Small Data: The Case of ‘Gripe’ (Flu) in Spanish , 2015 .

[2]  Amelec Viloria,et al.  Analysis of Patterns in the University World Rankings Webometrics, Shanghai, QS and SIR-SCimago: Case Latin America , 2018, DMBD.

[3]  S. Becken,et al.  Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data , 2019 .

[4]  Samy S. Abu Naser,et al.  Knowledge-based systems that determine the appropriate students major: In the faculty of engineering and information technology , 2016 .

[5]  D. Boyd,et al.  Six Provocations for Big Data , 2011 .

[6]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining , 2017, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[7]  Samy S. Abu Naser,et al.  A PROPOSED EXPERT SYSTEM FOR GUIDING FRESHMAN STUDENTS IN SELECTING A MAJOR IN AL-AZHAR UNIVERSITY, GAZA , 2008 .

[8]  Amelec Viloria,et al.  Virtual Network Level of Application Composed IP Networks Connected with Systems - (NETS Peer-to- Peer) , 2016 .

[9]  Samy S. Abu-Naser,et al.  A Proposed Expert System for Skin Diseases Diagnosis. INSInet Publication , 2008 .

[10]  Samy S. Abu Naser,et al.  Expert system urination problems diagnosis , 2016 .

[11]  Amelec Viloria,et al.  Database Performance Tuning and Query Optimization , 2018, DMBD.

[12]  Amelec Viloria,et al.  Efficiency Analysis of the Visibility of Latin American Universities and Their Impact on the Ranking Web , 2018, DMBD.

[13]  M. Snir,et al.  Big data, but are we ready? , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[14]  Bassem S. Abu-Nasser.  Medical Expert Systems Survey , 2017 .

[15]  David P. Woodruff,et al.  On Coresets for Logistic Regression , 2018, NeurIPS.

[16]  D. Lazer,et al.  The Parable of Google Flu: Traps in Big Data Analysis , 2014, Science.

[17]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Positive words carry less information than negative words , 2011, EPJ Data Science.

[18]  Trevor Campbell,et al.  Coresets for Scalable Bayesian Logistic Regression , 2016, NIPS.

[19]  Samy S. Abu-Naser,et al.  A proposed expert system for selecting exploratory factor analysis procedures , 2000 .

[20]  Samy S. Abu-Naser,et al.  Predicting Critical Cloud Computing Security Issues using Artificial Neural Network (ANNs) Algorithms in Banking Organizations , 2017 .

[21]  Al-Azhar University-Gaza,et al.  PREDICTING LEARNERS PERFORMANCE USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS IN LINEAR PROGRAMMING INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM , 2012 .