Perceptual and Physiologic Effects of Histamine Challenge on Nasal Breathing

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of histamine-induced nasal congestion on nasal airflow and the perception of externally applied resistance to nasal breathing. Nasal cross-sectional area and nasal airflow during free breathing were measured in 15 adult subjects before and after histamine challenge. The threshold for perception of resistance to nasal breathing was determined using a dynamic perturbator device, with both free breathing and controlled nasal airflow. The average threshold for perception of nasal resistance was 0.383 Pa/cm3/s at baseline. After histamine application, there was a significant decrease in nasal cross-sectional area (p = 0.0001), associated with a decrease in nasal airflow (r = 0.6). The average threshold of perception increased to 1.373 Pa/cm3/s (p < 0.0001). When nasal airflow was controlled at the baseline rate, the threshold of perception improved to 0.638 Pa/cm3/s (p = 0.024). These findings indicate that nasal congestion causes a reduction in both nasal airflow and the perception of resistance to nasal breathing. The ability to detect nasal airway impairment is improved with increased nasal airflow. An improved understanding of the physiology of the subjective perception of nasal patency may lead to innovative methods for the treatment of nasal obstruction.

[1]  A. Jones,et al.  The effect of histamine challenge on nasal airflow sensation. , 2007, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[2]  A. Jones,et al.  The role of the temperature of the nasal lining in the sensation of nasal patency. , 1996, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[3]  D. W. Warren,et al.  Perceptual and respiratory responses to added nasal airway resistance loads in older adults , 1995, The Laryngoscope.

[4]  K. Naito,et al.  New aerodynamic aspects of nasal patency. , 1995, Rhinology.

[5]  A. Drake,et al.  Nasal Airway in Breathing and Speech , 1992, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[6]  A. Jones,et al.  The role of mucosal receptors in the nasal sensation of airflow. , 1992, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[7]  T. Kumai,et al.  Airflow receptors in the lip and buccal mucosa , 1992, Brain Research Bulletin.

[8]  T. Nishino,et al.  Effects of topical nasal anaesthesia on shift of breathing route in adults , 1992, The Lancet.

[9]  R. Wight,et al.  Nasal sensation of airflow following blockade of the nasal trigeminal afferents. , 1989, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[10]  H. Pillsbury,et al.  Effects of cleft lip and palate on the nasal airway in children. , 1988, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[11]  T. Hoshino.  In Vitro Electrophysiologic Studies on Nasal Airway Receptors of the Rabbit , 1988, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[12]  D. W. Warren,et al.  Prevalence of mouthbreathing in cleft lip and palate. , 1988, The Cleft palate journal.

[13]  S. Kuna,et al.  Effect of laryngeal anesthesia on pulmonary function testing in normal subjects. , 1988, The American review of respiratory disease.

[14]  H. Pillsbury,et al.  Effects of size of the nasal airway on nasal airflow rate. , 1987, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[15]  D. White,et al.  Role of the nose in resistive load detection. , 1986, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  G. Shone,et al.  The effect of lignocaine on nasal resistance and nasal sensation of airflow. , 1986, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[17]  J. Haight,et al.  Nasal mucosal anaesthesia and airflow resistance. , 1985, Rhinology.

[18]  G. Sant'ambrogio,et al.  Respiratory afferent activity in the superior laryngeal nerves. , 1984, Respiration physiology.

[19]  D. W. Warren.  A quantitative technique for assessing nasal airway impairment. , 1984, American journal of orthodontics.

[20]  G. Sant'ambrogio,et al.  Laryngeal receptors responding to transmural pressure, airflow and local muscle activity. , 1983, Respiration physiology.

[21]  L. Diamond,et al.  A technique for measuring the perception of added resistive loads during nasal breathing. , 1983, Journal of pharmacological methods.

[22]  R. Eccles,et al.  The effect of menthol in nasal resistance to air flow , 1983, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[23]  G. Sant'ambrogio.  Information arising from the tracheobronchial tree of mammals. , 1982, Physiological Reviews.

[24]  D. W. Warren,et al.  Effect of restorative procedures on the nasopharyngeal airway in cleft palate. , 1974, The Cleft palate journal.

[25]  D. Kenshalo,et al.  Warm receptors in the nasal region of cats , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  N. Cauna,et al.  Sensory receptor organs of the human nasal respiratory mucosa. , 1969, The American journal of anatomy.

[27]  D. W. Warren,et al.  Nasal resistance, skeletal classification, and mouth breathing in orthodontic patients. , 1968, American journal of orthodontics.

[28]  H. Tsubone.  Nasal 'flow' receptors of the rat. , 1989, Respiration physiology.

[29]  R. Eccles,et al.  The effects of nasal anaesthesia upon nasal sensation of airflow. , 1988, Acta oto-laryngologica.