Knowledge network hubs and measures of research impact, science structure, and publication output in nanostructured solar cell research

This study on co-authorship networks in the area of nanostructured solar cells aims to contribute to a further understanding of the use of research evaluation measures of science output, impact and structure in an emerging research field. The study incorporates quantitative bibliometric methods of analysis and social network analysis in combination with a qualitative case study research approach. Conclusions drawn from the results emphasise, firstly, the importance of distinguishing between early and later phases of the evolution of a novel research field, and secondly, the application of a systemic view on learning processes and knowledge diffusion in a science-based technology field.

[1]  A. Hagfeldt,et al.  Deposition and characterization of screen-printed porous multi-layer thick film structures from semiconducting and conducting nanomaterials for use in photovoltaic devices , 2000 .

[2]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  M. Meyer.  Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature , 2000 .

[4]  Richard A. L. Jones,et al.  The Social and Economic Challenges of Nanotechnology , 2003 .

[5]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Transforming the Energy System — the Evolution of the German Technological System for Solar Cells , 2004 .

[6]  Peder Olesen Larsen,et al.  Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies , 2005, Scientometrics.

[7]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[8]  Joachim Schummer,et al.  Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2004, Scientometrics.

[9]  P. Muschamp,et al.  Future Technologies , 2004 .

[10]  A. F. J. Van Raan,et al.  Influence of interdisciplinarity on peer-review and bibliometric evaluations in physics research , 2001 .

[11]  Martin Meyer,et al.  What is Special about Patent Citations? Differences between Scientific and Patent Citations , 2000, Scientometrics.

[12]  Martin J. Beckmann,et al.  On knowledge networks in science: collaboration among equals , 1994 .

[13]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Network Position and Firm Performance: Organizational Returns to Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry , 1999 .

[14]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Tracing knowledge diffusion , 2004, Scientometrics.

[15]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance , 2003 .

[16]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  On the h-index - A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact , 2006, Scientometrics.

[17]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  Grilichesian Breakthroughs: Inventions of Methods of Inventing and Firm Entry in Nanotechnology , 2003 .

[18]  Stian Nygaard,et al.  Innovations in fuel cells and related hydrogen technology in Norway - OECD Case Study in the Energy Sector , 2003 .

[19]  Massimo Riccaboni,et al.  Technological change and network dynamics: Lessons from the pharmaceutical industry , 2001 .

[20]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Nanoscience and nanotecnology on the balance , 1997, Scientometrics.

[21]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Do Patents Reflect the Useful Research Output of Universities , 1998 .

[22]  Olle Persson,et al.  Studying research collaboration using co-authorships , 1996, Scientometrics.

[23]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[24]  Anders Hagfeldt,et al.  Structure and stability of small titanium/oxygen clusters studied by ab initio quantum chemical calculations , 1993 .

[25]  Lena Neij,et al.  Building Sustainable Energy Systems - Swedish Experience , 2001 .

[26]  R. Tijssen.  A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: Co-classification analysis of energy research☆ , 1992 .

[27]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  How to identify research groups using publication analysis: an example in the field of nanotechnology , 2006, Scientometrics.

[28]  Martin S. Meyer,et al.  Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology:An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology , 2001, Scientometrics.

[29]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  A concise review on the role of author self-citations in information science, bibliometrics and science policy , 2006, Scientometrics.

[30]  Paul A. David,et al.  The Economics of Scientific Research Coalitions: Collaborative Network Formation in the Presence of Multiple Funding Agencies , 2003 .

[31]  Anders Hagfeldt,et al.  Light-Induced Redox Reactions in Nanocrystalline Systems , 1995 .

[32]  A. H. Arnall,et al.  Future Technologies, Today's Choices- Nanotechnology, Artificial Intelligence and Robotics , 2003 .

[33]  Thomas Heinze,et al.  Emergence of Nano S&T in Germany. Network Formation and Company Performance. , 2006 .

[34]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[35]  M. Grätzel,et al.  A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films , 1991, Nature.

[36]  M. Meyer,et al.  Nanotechnology-interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application , 1998, Scientometrics.

[37]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[38]  Peidong Yang,et al.  Nanowire dye-sensitized solar cells , 2005, Nature materials.