The statistical assessment of the variability in observer perception and description of roentgenographic pulmonary shadows.

[1]  J. Yerushalmy,et al.  Reliability of chest radiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary lesions. , 1955, American journal of surgery.

[2]  J. Yerushalmy.  The reliability of chest roentgenography and its clinical implications. , 1953, Diseases of the chest.

[3]  L. Garland,et al.  Observer error in the interpretation of chest films; an international investigation. , 1952, Lancet.

[4]  E. Groth-Petersen,et al.  On the reliability of the reading of photofluorograms and value of dual reading. , 1952, Acta tuberculosea Scandinavica.

[5]  J. Yerushalmy,et al.  The clinical importance of lesions undetected in a mass radiographic survey of the chest. , 1951, American review of tuberculosis.

[6]  J. Yerushalmy,et al.  An evaluation of the role of serial chest roentgenograms in estimating the progress of disease in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. , 1951, American review of tuberculosis.

[7]  P. D. Oldham,et al.  The Use of Standard Films in the Radiological Diagnosis of Coalworkers' Pneumoconiosis , 1951, British journal of industrial medicine.

[8]  J. Yerushalmy,et al.  The Role of Dual Reading in Mass Radiography1,2 , 1950 .

[9]  L. Garland.  On the scientific evaluation of diagnostic procedures. , 1949, Radiology.

[10]  J. Yerushalmy.  Statistical problems in assessing methods of medical diagnosis, with special reference to X-ray techniques. , 1947, Public health reports.

[11]  W E CHAMBERLAIN,et al.  Tuberculosis case finding; a comparison of the effectiveness of various roentgenographic and photofluorographic methods. , 1947, Journal of the American Medical Association.