New Management Strategy for Fluid Resuscitation: Quantifying Volume in the First 48 Hours After Burn Injury

This study evaluated a 24-hour resuscitation protocol, established a formula to quantify resuscitation volume for the second 24 hours, described the relationship between the first and second 24 hours, and identified which patients required high volumes. A protocol for patients with burn >15% TBSA was implemented in 2009. Initial fluid was based on the Parkland calculation and adjusted to meet a goal urine output. Protocol compliance was defined as appropriate fluid titration to maintain urine output. Resuscitation ratio in the second 24 hours was tabulated as total fluid /(evaporative loss + maintenance fluid + estimated colloid). Data were collected prospectively from 2009 to 2011. A Wilcoxon rank test compared differences between groups. Regression analyses analyzed volume administered. P < .05 was statistically significant. Forty patients with burn >15% TBSA met criteria for inclusion. Mean age, burn size, and resuscitation volumes in the first and second 24 hours (mean + SD) were 47+ 20.7 years, 29.9 + 14.6% TBSA, 7.4 + 3.7 ml/kg/% TBSA, and a ratio of 1.9 times expected volume (SD, 1.3), respectively. Protocol compliance was 34%. Intubation, older age, and increased narcotic administration correlated with higher resuscitation volumes. A higher resuscitation volume in the first 24 hours significantly correlated with a higher resuscitation volume in the second 24 hours (P < .001). In conclusion, there is a significant relationship between fluid administration in the first and second 24 hours of resuscitation; intubation, older age, and narcotics correlate with higher volumes. A formula for observed/expected volumes in the second 24 hours is total fluid/(evaporative loss + maintenance fluid +estimated colloid).

[1]  M. James Place of the colloids in fluid resuscitation of the traumatized patient , 2012, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[2]  J. Saffle,et al.  Review of a Fluid Resuscitation Protocol: “Fluid Creep” Is Not Due to Nursing Error , 2012, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[3]  José Salinas,et al.  Computerized decision support system improves fluid resuscitation following severe burns: An original study* , 2011, Critical care medicine.

[4]  C. Lentz,et al.  Resuscitation After Severe Burn Injury Using High-Dose Ascorbic Acid: A Retrospective Review , 2011, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[5]  R. Cartotto,et al.  Fluid Creep: The Pendulum Hasn't Swung Back Yet! , 2010, Journal of Burn Care & Research.

[6]  J. Saffle,et al.  Colloid Administration Normalizes Resuscitation Ratio and Ameliorates “Fluid Creep” , 2010, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[7]  E. Petrela,et al.  Comparison of hypertonic vs isotonic fluids during resuscitation of severely burned patients. , 2009, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[8]  D. Traber,et al.  Pathophysiology, management and treatment of smoke inhalation injury , 2009, Expert review of respiratory medicine.

[9]  A. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Intraabdominal Hypertension and the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome in Burn Patients , 2009, World Journal of Surgery.

[10]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[11]  C. Hartford Invited Critique: Fluid Creep , 2007 .

[12]  D. Greenhalgh Burn Resuscitation , 2007, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[13]  J. Saffle The Phenomenon of “Fluid Creep” in Acute Burn Resuscitation , 2007, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[14]  G. Warden Chapter 9 – Fluid resuscitation and early management , 2007 .

[15]  Michael A Dubick,et al.  HIGH-DOSE VITAMIN C INFUSION REDUCES FLUID REQUIREMENTS IN THE RESUSCITATION OF BURN-INJURED SHEEP , 2005, Shock.

[16]  F.A.C.S. Basil A. Pruitt Jr. M.D. Advances in fluid therapy and the early care of the burn patient , 2005, World Journal of Surgery.

[17]  S. Heckbert,et al.  "Opioid creep" is real and may be the cause of "fluid creep". , 2004, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[18]  Matthew B Klein,et al.  Is supra-Baxter resuscitation in burn patients a new phenomenon? , 2004, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[19]  Alia D. Shah,et al.  Evaluation of Hyperdynamic Resuscitation in 60% TBSA Burn-Injured Sheep , 2004, Shock.

[20]  G. Mcgwin,et al.  Long-term trends in mortality according to age among adult burn patients. , 2003, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[21]  A. Cooper,et al.  How well does the Parkland formula estimate actual fluid resuscitation volumes? , 2002, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[22]  B. Pruitt Protection from excessive resuscitation: "pushing the pendulum back". , 2000, The Journal of trauma.

[23]  R. Gamelli,et al.  A biopsy of the use of the Baxter formula to resuscitate burns or do we do it like Charlie did it? , 2000, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[24]  D. Herndon Total Burn Care , 1996 .

[25]  B. Pruitt Advances in fluid therapy and the early care of the burn patient , 1978, World journal of surgery.

[26]  C. Baxter,et al.  PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO CRYSTALLOID RESUSCITATION OF SEVERE BURNS , 1968, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.