Seismic Risk Assessment of a 42-Story Reinforced Concrete Dual-System Building Considering Mainshock and Aftershock Hazard

AbstractA seismic risk assessment of a 42-story reinforced concrete dual-system building considering mainshock and aftershock hazard is presented. Sequential nonlinear response history analyses are...

[1]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for the Average Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA at Spectral Periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s , 2008 .

[2]  H. Burton,et al.  A machine learning framework for assessing post-earthquake structural safety , 2018 .

[3]  Quanwang Li,et al.  Performance evaluation and damage assessment of steel frame buildings under main shock–aftershock earthquake sequences , 2007 .

[4]  Junho Song,et al.  Energy-based seismic collapse criterion for ductile planar structural frames , 2017 .

[5]  P. Reasenberg,et al.  Earthquake Hazard After a Mainshock in California , 1989, Science.

[6]  Abdollah Shafieezadeh,et al.  Multiple hazard incidents lifecycle cost assessment of structural systems considering state‐dependent repair times and fragility curves , 2016 .

[7]  Nicolas Luco,et al.  Aftershock collapse vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete frame structures , 2015 .

[8]  J. Wallace,et al.  Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams—Part II: Modeling , 2013 .

[9]  Ronald O. Hamburger,et al.  Case study of a 40‐storey buckling‐restrained braced frame building located in Los Angeles , 2009 .

[10]  Gregory G. Deierlein,et al.  Integrating visual damage simulation, virtual inspection, and collapse capacity to evaluate post‐earthquake structural safety of buildings , 2018 .

[11]  Farzin Zareian,et al.  Seismic response of a 40‐storey buckling‐restrained braced frame designed for the Los Angeles region , 2013 .

[12]  Ron Klemencic,et al.  Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams—Part I: Testing , 2013 .

[13]  Luis Ibarra,et al.  Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration , 2005 .

[14]  Gee Liek Yeo,et al.  Equivalent constant rates for post-quake seismic decision making , 2009 .

[15]  J. Wallace,et al.  Flexural modeling of reinforced concrete walls- : Experimental verification , 2006 .

[16]  Jorge Ruiz-García,et al.  Evaluation of drift demands in existing steel frames under as-recorded far-field and near-fault mainshock–aftershock seismic sequences , 2011 .

[17]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Framework of aftershock fragility assessment–case studies: older California reinforced concrete building frames , 2015 .

[18]  Toshihiro Noda,et al.  Damage statistics (Summary of the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake damage) , 2012 .

[19]  Daniel Straub,et al.  Improved seismic fragility modeling from empirical data , 2008 .

[20]  Y. Ogata,et al.  The Centenary of the Omori Formula for a Decay Law of Aftershock Activity , 1995 .

[21]  Han Sun,et al.  Estimating aftershock collapse vulnerability using mainshock intensity, structural response and physical damage indicators , 2017 .

[22]  Miles Parker,et al.  The Economic Impact of the Canterbury Earthquakes , 2012 .

[23]  Mohsen Rahnama,et al.  Development of earthquake vulnerability functions for tall buildings , 2012 .

[24]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  Performance assessment of tall concrete core‐wall building designed using two alternative approaches , 2012 .

[25]  Gee Liek Yeo,et al.  A probabilistic framework for quantification of aftershock ground‐motion hazard in California: Methodology and parametric study , 2009 .

[26]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Pattern recognition approach to assess the residual structural capacity of damaged tall buildings , 2019, Structural Safety.

[27]  J. Conte,et al.  Flexural Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Walls- Model Attributes , 2004 .